Blinch Jarrod, Jensen Kouts Taylor
Department of Kinesiology & Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Box 43011, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA.
Department of Kinesiology & Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Box 43011, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA.
Hum Mov Sci. 2018 Aug;60:139-149. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
The purpose of the current study was to investigate whether integrated visual feedback and movement templates could facilitate bimanual movements with different patterns of spatiotemporal coupling and decoupling. Knowing when Lissajous feedback and movement templates improve bimanual movements, and when they do not, will help determine the mechanisms of task conceptualisation. We tested two bimanual asymmetric conditions where different movement templates were used to encourage the movements to travel different paths to the same targets. The asymmetric straight condition was the same as Shea, Boyle, and Kovacs (2012), and we predicted that we would replicate their results and find no temporal coupling. The novel asymmetric diagonal condition required movements with a 2:1 movement ratio (relative spatiotemporal coupling). Longer movement time and larger root-mean-square deviation of the trajectories suggested that asymmetric straight movements were more difficult than symmetric movements. Even longer movement times and fewer target hits suggested that asymmetric diagonal movements were more difficult than asymmetric straight movements. Lissajous feedback and movement templates made the difficult asymmetric movements possible. However, movements with relative spatiotemporal coupling were the most difficult and movements without temporal coupling were still more difficult than symmetric movements. We suggest that Lissajous feedback and movement templates improved the task conceptualisation, which eliminated or reduced the high-level cognitive constraints. The low-level neuromuscular constraints, however, persisted and these caused the increased difficulty for asymmetric movements. Improving the task conceptualisation can facilitate asymmetric movements. These asymmetric movements still have different difficulties and they are not as easy as symmetric movements.
本研究的目的是调查整合视觉反馈和运动模板是否能够促进具有不同时空耦合和解耦模式的双手运动。了解李萨如反馈和运动模板何时能改善双手运动,何时不能,将有助于确定任务概念化的机制。我们测试了两种双手不对称条件,其中使用不同的运动模板来促使运动沿着不同路径到达相同目标。不对称直线条件与谢伊、博伊尔和科瓦奇(2012年)的相同,我们预测会重复他们的结果,且不会发现时间耦合。新颖的不对称对角线条件要求运动具有2:1的运动比例(相对时空耦合)。更长的运动时间和轨迹的更大均方根偏差表明,不对称直线运动比对称运动更困难。甚至更长的运动时间和更少的目标命中次数表明,不对称对角线运动比不对称直线运动更困难。李萨如反馈和运动模板使困难的不对称运动成为可能。然而,具有相对时空耦合的运动是最困难的,而没有时间耦合的运动仍然比对称运动更困难。我们认为李萨如反馈和运动模板改善了任务概念化,从而消除或减少了高级认知限制。然而,低级神经肌肉限制仍然存在,这些导致了不对称运动难度的增加。改善任务概念化可以促进不对称运动。这些不对称运动仍然有不同的难度,而且它们并不像对称运动那样容易。