Jödicke Andreas, Bauer Karsten, Hajdukova Andrea
Department of Neurosurgery, Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Berlin, Germany.
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2018 Sep;79(5):391-397. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1655740. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
Discharge to rehabilitation is reported in large studies as one important outcome parameter based on hospital codes. Because neurologic outcome scores (e.g., the modified Rankin Scale [mRS]) are missing in International Classification of Diseases (ICD) databases, rehabilitation indirectly serves as a kind of surrogate parameter for overall outcome. Reported fractions of patients with rehabilitation, however, largely differ between studies and seem high for patients with aneurysm clipping. Variances in rehabilitation fractions seem to largely differ between treatments (clipping versus coiling) for unruptured intracranial aneurysms, so we analyzed our patients for percentage of and potential factors predicting rehabilitation.
From July 2007 to September 2013, 100 consecutive patients with at least one cerebral aneurysm underwent aneurysm clipping. Aneurysms were classified as incidental, associated, pretreated (coil compaction after subarachnoid hemorrhage), and symptomatic (oculomotor nerve compression, microemboli), and they were assigned to their anatomical location. Complications (infection, hemorrhage, cerebrospinal fluid fistula, transient and permanent neurologic deficit, reoperation) and outcome (mRS at 6 months; clip occlusion rate by postoperative digital subtraction angiography) as well as frequency and type of rehabilitation were analyzed and correlated retrospectively. Multiple aneurysms clipped in one procedure were not counted separately regarding complications or outcome (i.e., one patient, one outcome).
The overall complication rate was 17% including 10% early and 3% permanent neurologic deficits and 7% reoperations. There were no deaths. Overall, 98% of patients had a good outcome (mRS 0-2). Clip occlusion rate was 97.9%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified aneurysm location as the only significant independent factor for risk of complication ( < 0.001) and complication as the only significant independent risk factor for rehabilitation ( = 0.003). Rehabilitation was indicated or requested by the patient as early neurologic rehabilitation (5%), inpatient follow-up (15%), and outpatient follow-up (15%). The long-term care rate was 2%.
Microsurgery of unruptured and not acutely ruptured aneurysms (including post-coil and associated aneurysms) has a low rate of rehabilitation with a low risk of a permanent neurologic deficit, long-term care, or early neurologic rehabilitation. The rate of rehabilitation is well below reported risks from studies based on ICD-based health care analysis. Rehabilitation per se is not a good indicator for outcome.
在大型研究中,基于医院编码,转至康复机构被报告为一项重要的结局参数。由于国际疾病分类(ICD)数据库中缺少神经功能结局评分(如改良Rankin量表[mRS]),康复间接作为总体结局的一种替代参数。然而,不同研究报告的接受康复治疗的患者比例差异很大,对于接受动脉瘤夹闭术的患者而言,这一比例似乎较高。未破裂颅内动脉瘤的康复比例差异在不同治疗方式(夹闭术与血管内栓塞术)之间似乎也有很大不同,因此我们分析了我们的患者接受康复治疗的比例以及预测康复的潜在因素。
2007年7月至2013年9月,100例连续的至少患有一个脑动脉瘤的患者接受了动脉瘤夹闭术。动脉瘤被分类为偶然发现的、伴发的、预处理的(蛛网膜下腔出血后弹簧圈致密化)和有症状的(动眼神经受压、微栓子),并根据其解剖位置进行分类。对并发症(感染、出血、脑脊液漏、短暂性和永久性神经功能缺损、再次手术)和结局(6个月时的mRS;术后数字减影血管造影显示的夹子闭塞率)以及康复的频率和类型进行回顾性分析并关联。在一次手术中夹闭多个动脉瘤时,在并发症或结局方面不单独计算(即一名患者,一个结局)。
总体并发症发生率为17%,包括10%的早期和3%的永久性神经功能缺损以及7%的再次手术。无死亡病例。总体而言,98%的患者预后良好(mRS 0 - 2)。夹子闭塞率为97.9%。多因素逻辑回归分析确定动脉瘤位置是并发症风险的唯一显著独立因素(<0.001),而并发症是康复的唯一显著独立风险因素(=0.003)。康复由患者表示或要求进行,包括早期神经康复(5%)、住院随访(15%)和门诊随访(15%)。长期护理率为2%。
未破裂且非急性破裂动脉瘤(包括弹簧圈置入术后和伴发的动脉瘤)的显微手术康复率低,永久性神经功能缺损、长期护理或早期神经康复的风险低。康复率远低于基于ICD的医疗保健分析研究报告的风险。康复本身并不是结局的良好指标。