Suppr超能文献

动脉自旋标记灌注成像:鉴别脑内轴内肿瘤性与非肿瘤性病变的前瞻性磁共振成像

Arterial spin labeling perfusion: Prospective MR imaging in differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic intra-axial brain lesions.

作者信息

Soni Neetu, Srindharan Karthika, Kumar Sunil, Mishra Prabhakar, Bathla Girish, Kalita Jyantee, Behari Sanjay

机构信息

1 Neuroradiology Department, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.

2 Department of Radiology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

出版信息

Neuroradiol J. 2018 Dec;31(6):544-553. doi: 10.1177/1971400918783058. Epub 2018 Jun 12.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this article is to assess the diagnostic performance of arterial spin-labeling (ASL) magnetic resonance perfusion imaging to differentiate neoplastic from non-neoplastic brain lesions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective study included 60 consecutive, newly diagnosed, untreated patients with intra-axial lesions with perilesional edema (PE) who underwent clinical magnetic resonance imaging including ASL sequences at 3T. Region of interest analysis was performed to obtain mean cerebral blood flow (CBF) values from lesion (L), PE and normal contralateral white matter (CWM). Normalized (n) CBF ratio was obtained by dividing the mean CBF value of L and PE by mean CBF value of CWM. Discriminant analyses were performed to determine the best cutoff value of nCBFL and nCBFPE in differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic lesions.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were in the neoplastic group (15 high-grade gliomas (HGGs), 15 metastases) and 30 in the non-neoplastic group (12 tuberculomas, 10 neurocysticercosis, four abscesses, two fungal granulomas and two tumefactive demyelination) based on final histopathology and clincoradiological diagnosis. We found higher nCBFL (6.65 ± 4.07 vs 1.68 ± 0.80, p < 0.001) and nCBFPE (1.86 ± 1.43 vs 0.74 ± 0.21, p < 0.001) values in the neoplastic group than non-neoplastic. For predicting neoplastic lesions, we found an nCBFL cutoff value of 1.89 (AUC 0.917; 95% CI 0.854 to 0.980; sensitivity 90%; specificity 73%) and nCBFPE value of 0.76 (AUC 0.783; 95% CI 0.675 to 0.891; sensitivity 80%; specificity 58%). Mean nCBFL was higher in HGGs (8.70 ± 4.16) compared to tuberculomas (1.98 ± 0.87); and nCBFPE was higher in HGGs (3.06 ± 1.53) compared to metastases (0.86 ± 0.34) and tuberculomas (0.73 ± 0.22) ( p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

ASL perfusion may help in distinguishing neoplastic from non-neoplastic brain lesions.

摘要

目的

本文旨在评估动脉自旋标记(ASL)磁共振灌注成像在鉴别脑肿瘤性病变与非肿瘤性病变方面的诊断性能。

材料与方法

本前瞻性研究纳入了60例连续的、新诊断的、未经治疗的轴内病变合并瘤周水肿(PE)的患者,这些患者均接受了3T临床磁共振成像检查,包括ASL序列。进行感兴趣区分析,以获取病变(L)、PE和对侧正常白质(CWM)的平均脑血流量(CBF)值。通过将L和PE的平均CBF值除以CWM的平均CBF值来获得标准化(n)CBF比值。进行判别分析,以确定nCBFL和nCBFPE在鉴别肿瘤性病变与非肿瘤性病变时的最佳截断值。

结果

根据最终组织病理学和临床放射学诊断,30例患者为肿瘤性病变组(15例高级别胶质瘤(HGG),15例转移瘤),30例为非肿瘤性病变组(12例结核瘤,10例脑囊虫病,4例脓肿,2例真菌性肉芽肿和2例瘤样脱髓鞘病变)。我们发现肿瘤性病变组的nCBFL(6.65±4.07 vs 1.68±0.80,p<0.001)和nCBFPE(1.86±1.43 vs 0.74±0.21,p<0.001)值高于非肿瘤性病变组。对于预测肿瘤性病变,我们发现nCBFL的截断值为1.89(AUC 0.917;95%CI 0.854至0.980;敏感性90%;特异性73%),nCBFPE的截断值为0.76(AUC 0.783;95%CI 0.675至0.891;敏感性80%;特异性58%)。HGGs的平均nCBFL(8.70±4.16)高于结核瘤(1.98±0.87);HGGs的nCBFPE(3.06±1.53)高于转移瘤(0.86±0.34)和结核瘤(0.73±0.22)(p<0.001)。

结论

ASL灌注有助于鉴别脑肿瘤性病变与非肿瘤性病变。

相似文献

2
Comparative Evaluation of Brain Tuberculosis and Metastases Using Combined Analysis of Arterial Spin Labeling Perfusion and Diffusion Tensor Imaging.
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2019 Nov-Dec;48(6):547-553. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
4
Assesment of perfusion in glial tumors with arterial spin labeling; comparison with dynamic susceptibility contrast method.
Eur J Radiol. 2014 Oct;83(10):1914-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.07.002. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
7
10
[Application value of whole brain 3D artery spin labeling in diagnosis of intracranial tumors].
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2017 Jun 20;97(23):1801-1804. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2017.23.009.

引用本文的文献

1
VASARI-auto: Equitable, efficient, and economical featurisation of glioma MRI.
Neuroimage Clin. 2024;44:103668. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2024.103668. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
2
Tumefactive demyelinating lesions: A literature review of recent findings.
Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2024 Jul;29(3):153-160. doi: 10.17712/nsj.2024.3.20230111.
5
Three-dimensional arterial spin labeling-guided dose painting radiotherapy for non-enhancing low-grade gliomas.
Jpn J Radiol. 2023 Mar;41(3):335-346. doi: 10.1007/s11604-022-01357-z. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
7
Arterial spin labeling clinical applications for brain tumors and tumor treatment complications: A comprehensive case-based review.
Neuroradiol J. 2023 Apr;36(2):129-141. doi: 10.1177/19714009221114444. Epub 2022 Jul 10.
10
Advanced magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy in a case of neurocysticercosis from North America.
Neuroradiol J. 2022 Feb;35(1):119-125. doi: 10.1177/19714009211026889. Epub 2021 Jun 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Author's Reply: Arterial spin labeling.
Neurol India. 2018 Jan-Feb;66(1):285. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.222836.
4
A meta-analysis of arterial spin labelling perfusion values for the prediction of glioma grade.
Clin Radiol. 2017 Mar;72(3):255-261. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.10.016. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
5
Differentiation of Glioblastoma from Brain Metastasis: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis Using Arterial Spin Labeling MR Imaging.
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 18;11(11):e0166662. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166662. eCollection 2016.
6
Arterial Spin Labeling Perfusion of the Brain: Emerging Clinical Applications.
Radiology. 2016 Nov;281(2):337-356. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016150789.
9
Arterial Spin-labeling in Central Nervous System Infection.
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2016 Oct 11;15(4):386-394. doi: 10.2463/mrms.mp.2015-0140. Epub 2016 Mar 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验