Soni Neetu, Srindharan Karthika, Kumar Sunil, Mishra Prabhakar, Bathla Girish, Kalita Jyantee, Behari Sanjay
1 Neuroradiology Department, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.
2 Department of Radiology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Neuroradiol J. 2018 Dec;31(6):544-553. doi: 10.1177/1971400918783058. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
The purpose of this article is to assess the diagnostic performance of arterial spin-labeling (ASL) magnetic resonance perfusion imaging to differentiate neoplastic from non-neoplastic brain lesions.
This prospective study included 60 consecutive, newly diagnosed, untreated patients with intra-axial lesions with perilesional edema (PE) who underwent clinical magnetic resonance imaging including ASL sequences at 3T. Region of interest analysis was performed to obtain mean cerebral blood flow (CBF) values from lesion (L), PE and normal contralateral white matter (CWM). Normalized (n) CBF ratio was obtained by dividing the mean CBF value of L and PE by mean CBF value of CWM. Discriminant analyses were performed to determine the best cutoff value of nCBFL and nCBFPE in differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic lesions.
Thirty patients were in the neoplastic group (15 high-grade gliomas (HGGs), 15 metastases) and 30 in the non-neoplastic group (12 tuberculomas, 10 neurocysticercosis, four abscesses, two fungal granulomas and two tumefactive demyelination) based on final histopathology and clincoradiological diagnosis. We found higher nCBFL (6.65 ± 4.07 vs 1.68 ± 0.80, p < 0.001) and nCBFPE (1.86 ± 1.43 vs 0.74 ± 0.21, p < 0.001) values in the neoplastic group than non-neoplastic. For predicting neoplastic lesions, we found an nCBFL cutoff value of 1.89 (AUC 0.917; 95% CI 0.854 to 0.980; sensitivity 90%; specificity 73%) and nCBFPE value of 0.76 (AUC 0.783; 95% CI 0.675 to 0.891; sensitivity 80%; specificity 58%). Mean nCBFL was higher in HGGs (8.70 ± 4.16) compared to tuberculomas (1.98 ± 0.87); and nCBFPE was higher in HGGs (3.06 ± 1.53) compared to metastases (0.86 ± 0.34) and tuberculomas (0.73 ± 0.22) ( p < 0.001).
ASL perfusion may help in distinguishing neoplastic from non-neoplastic brain lesions.
本文旨在评估动脉自旋标记(ASL)磁共振灌注成像在鉴别脑肿瘤性病变与非肿瘤性病变方面的诊断性能。
本前瞻性研究纳入了60例连续的、新诊断的、未经治疗的轴内病变合并瘤周水肿(PE)的患者,这些患者均接受了3T临床磁共振成像检查,包括ASL序列。进行感兴趣区分析,以获取病变(L)、PE和对侧正常白质(CWM)的平均脑血流量(CBF)值。通过将L和PE的平均CBF值除以CWM的平均CBF值来获得标准化(n)CBF比值。进行判别分析,以确定nCBFL和nCBFPE在鉴别肿瘤性病变与非肿瘤性病变时的最佳截断值。
根据最终组织病理学和临床放射学诊断,30例患者为肿瘤性病变组(15例高级别胶质瘤(HGG),15例转移瘤),30例为非肿瘤性病变组(12例结核瘤,10例脑囊虫病,4例脓肿,2例真菌性肉芽肿和2例瘤样脱髓鞘病变)。我们发现肿瘤性病变组的nCBFL(6.65±4.07 vs 1.68±0.80,p<0.001)和nCBFPE(1.86±1.43 vs 0.74±0.21,p<0.001)值高于非肿瘤性病变组。对于预测肿瘤性病变,我们发现nCBFL的截断值为1.89(AUC 0.917;95%CI 0.854至0.980;敏感性90%;特异性73%),nCBFPE的截断值为0.76(AUC 0.783;95%CI 0.675至0.891;敏感性80%;特异性58%)。HGGs的平均nCBFL(8.70±4.16)高于结核瘤(1.98±0.87);HGGs的nCBFPE(3.06±1.53)高于转移瘤(0.86±0.34)和结核瘤(0.73±0.22)(p<0.001)。
ASL灌注有助于鉴别脑肿瘤性病变与非肿瘤性病变。