Lin Lin, Xue Yunjing, Duan Qing, Sun Bin, Lin Hailong, Huang Xinming, Chen Xiaodan
Department of Radiology, Union Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Department of Radiology, Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Oncotarget. 2016 Oct 18;7(42):69051-69059. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12053.
Differentiation of glioblastomas from solitary brain metastases using conventional MRI remains an important unsolved problem. In this study, we introduced the conception of the cerebral blood flow (CBF) gradient in peritumoral edema-the difference in CBF values from the proximity of the enhancing tumor to the normal-appearing white matter, and investigated the contribution of perfusion metrics on the discrimination of glioblastoma from a metastatic lesion.
Fifty-two consecutive patients with glioblastoma or a solitary metastatic lesion underwent three-dimensional arterial spin labeling (3D-ASL) before surgical resection. The CBF values were measured in the peritumoral edema (near: G1; Intermediate: G2; Far: G3). The CBF gradient was calculated as the subtractions CBFG1 -CBFG3, CBFG1 - CBFG2 and CBFG2 - CBFG3. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to seek for the best cutoff value permitting discrimination between these two tumors.
The absolute/related CBF values and the CBF gradient in the peritumoral regions of glioblastomas were significantly higher than those in metastases(P < 0.038). ROC curve analysis reveals, a cutoff value of 1.92 ml/100g for the CBF gradient of CBFG1 -CBFG3 generated the best combination of sensitivity (92.86%) and specificity (100.00%) for distinguishing between a glioblastoma and metastasis.
The CBF gradient in peritumoral edema appears to be a more promising ASL perfusion metrics in differentiating high grade glioma from a solitary metastasis.
利用传统磁共振成像(MRI)鉴别胶质母细胞瘤与孤立性脑转移瘤仍是一个重要的未解决问题。在本研究中,我们引入了瘤周水肿中脑血流量(CBF)梯度的概念——即从强化肿瘤附近到外观正常白质的CBF值差异,并研究灌注指标在鉴别胶质母细胞瘤与转移瘤中的作用。
52例连续的胶质母细胞瘤或孤立性转移瘤患者在手术切除前接受了三维动脉自旋标记(3D-ASL)检查。在瘤周水肿区域(近:G1;中间:G2;远:G3)测量CBF值。计算CBF梯度,即CBFG1 -CBFG3、CBFG1 - CBFG2和CBFG2 - CBFG3的差值。采用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析来寻找区分这两种肿瘤的最佳临界值。
胶质母细胞瘤瘤周区域的绝对/相对CBF值和CBF梯度显著高于转移瘤(P < 0.038)。ROC曲线分析显示,CBFG1 -CBFG3的CBF梯度临界值为1.92 ml/100g时,在区分胶质母细胞瘤和转移瘤方面产生了最佳的敏感性(92.86%)和特异性(100.00%)组合。
瘤周水肿中的CBF梯度似乎是一种更有前景的ASL灌注指标,可用于鉴别高级别胶质瘤与孤立性转移瘤。