• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

缝线直径和环形构型对Ⅱ区屈肌腱修复中缝线-肌腱界面的影响

The Impact of Suture Caliber and Looped Configurations on the Suture-Tendon Interface in Zone II Flexor Tendon Repair.

作者信息

Bernstein Derek T, Alexander Jamie J, Petersen Nancy J, Lambert Bradley S, Noble Philip C, Netscher David T

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Houston, TX.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Am. 2019 Feb;44(2):156.e1-156.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.04.029. Epub 2018 Jun 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.04.029
PMID:29891271
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of suture caliber and looped configurations on the integrity of 4-strand modified Kessler zone II flexor tendon repairs during progressive cyclic loading.

METHODS

Seventy-two flexor digitorum profundus tendons from 18 fresh human cadaver hands were divided into 4 repair groups. Thirty-six matched tendons underwent repair using either a 4-0 looped or 4-0 single-stranded suture, and an additional 36 tendons underwent 3-0 looped or 3-0 single-stranded repairs. Repair strength was tested by progressive cyclic loading. The force generating 2-mm gap formation, ultimate failure, and the mechanism of failure were recorded for each test. The impact of looped versus single-stranded configurations and the effect of tendon cross-sectional area on repair integrity were analyzed for each suture caliber.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference between groups regarding the force to 2-mm gap formation or ultimate failure, and all values exceeded the minimum threshold of 27 N required to withstand an early active range of motion rehabilitation protocol. The use of a 3-0 caliber suture resulted in a significantly higher proportion of repairs failing by suture pullout through the tendon substance, including 63.5% of looped and 38.9% of single-stranded core sutures. By comparison, this occurred in 11.1% of 4-0 looped and 0% of 4-0 single-stranded sutures. Larger tendon cross-sectional areas were associated with more robust repairs, particularly in the 3-0 looped group.

CONCLUSIONS

In a human cadaver flexor tendon repair model, there was no significant difference in the mean force to failure between all 4 flexor tendon repair constructs under progressive cyclic loading. However, the 3-0 caliber suture failed more frequently by suture pullout, particularly with the use of a looped suture.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Four-strand flexor tendon repairs using a 3-0 caliber suture are more prone to early failure by suture pullout under progressive cyclic loading compared with a 4-0 caliber suture.

摘要

目的

评估缝线直径和环行构型对改良KesslerⅡ区四股屈指肌腱修复在渐进性循环加载过程中完整性的影响。

方法

取自18只新鲜人尸体手的72条指深屈肌腱被分为4个修复组。36条匹配的肌腱分别使用4-0环行或4-0单股缝线进行修复,另外36条肌腱进行3-0环行或3-0单股修复。通过渐进性循环加载测试修复强度。记录每次测试中产生2毫米间隙形成的力、最终失败力以及失败机制。分析每种缝线直径下环行与单股构型的影响以及肌腱横截面积对修复完整性的影响。

结果

在形成2毫米间隙的力或最终失败力方面,各修复组之间无统计学显著差异,且所有数值均超过了早期主动活动范围康复方案所需的27牛的最低阈值。使用3-0直径缝线导致通过肌腱实质的缝线拔出而失败的修复比例显著更高,包括63.5%的环行和38.9%的单股核心缝线。相比之下,4-0环行缝线中这一情况占11.1%,4-0单股缝线中为0%。较大的肌腱横截面积与更稳固的修复相关,尤其是在3-0环行组。

结论

在人体尸体屈肌腱修复模型中,在渐进性循环加载下,所有4种屈肌腱修复结构的平均失败力无显著差异。然而,3-0直径缝线因缝线拔出而失败的情况更频繁,尤其是使用环行缝线时。

临床意义

与4-0直径缝线相比,使用3-0直径缝线进行四股屈肌腱修复在渐进性循环加载下更易因缝线拔出而早期失败。

相似文献

1
The Impact of Suture Caliber and Looped Configurations on the Suture-Tendon Interface in Zone II Flexor Tendon Repair.缝线直径和环形构型对Ⅱ区屈肌腱修复中缝线-肌腱界面的影响
J Hand Surg Am. 2019 Feb;44(2):156.e1-156.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.04.029. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
2
Looped versus single-stranded flexor tendon repairs: a cadaveric mechanical study.环形与单股屈肌腱修复:一项尸体力学研究。
J Hand Surg Am. 2015 May;40(5):958-62.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.01.035. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
3
Gliding characteristics and gap formation for locking and grasping tendon repairs: a biomechanical study in a human cadaver model.锁定和抓持肌腱修复的滑动特性及间隙形成:人体尸体模型的生物力学研究
J Hand Surg Am. 2004 Jan;29(1):6-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2003.09.017.
4
Cyclic testing of six-strand suture techniques for zone 2 flexor tendon lacerations.六股缝线技术修复 2 区屈肌腱撕裂的循环测试。
J Orthop Sci. 2024 Sep;29(5):1214-1219. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2023.09.007. Epub 2023 Oct 14.
5
Flexor Tendon Repair With Looped Suture: 1 Versus 2 Knots.采用环行缝合法进行屈肌腱修复:单结与双结对比
J Hand Surg Am. 2016 Mar;41(3):422-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.12.011. Epub 2016 Jan 16.
6
Comparing Biomechanical Properties, Repair Times, and Value of Common Core Flexor Tendon Repairs.比较常见核心屈肌腱修复的生物力学特性、修复时间和价值。
Hand (N Y). 2018 May;13(3):313-318. doi: 10.1177/1558944717701238. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
7
Biomechanical Analysis of Zone 2 Flexor Tendon Repair With a Coupler Device Versus Locking Cruciate Core Suture.使用耦合器装置与锁定十字形核心缝合对2区屈肌腱修复的生物力学分析
J Hand Surg Am. 2020 Sep;45(9):878.e1-878.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.02.015. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
8
The effect of suture caliber and number of core suture strands on zone II flexor tendon repair: a study in human cadavers.缝线直径及核心缝线股数对Ⅱ区屈指肌腱修复的影响:一项人体尸体研究
J Hand Surg Am. 2014 Feb;39(2):262-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.11.001. Epub 2013 Dec 15.
9
A new modified Tsuge suture for flexor tendon repairs: the biomechanical analysis and clinical application.一种用于屈指肌腱修复的新型改良津下缝合法:生物力学分析与临床应用
J Orthop Surg Res. 2014 Dec 31;9:136. doi: 10.1186/s13018-014-0136-x.
10
An Exploratory Study Using Semi-Tabular Plate in Zone II Flexor Tendon Repair.一项使用半管状钢板进行Ⅱ区屈肌腱修复的探索性研究。
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2018 Dec;23(4):547-553. doi: 10.1142/S242483551850056X.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally Invasive Suture Technique Pull-out to Repair the Acute Flexor Tendons in Zone II of the Hand.微创缝线抽出技术修复手部Ⅱ区急性屈指肌腱
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2024 Mar 21;59(1):e60-e67. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1779332. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Beyond the Core Suture: A New Approach to Tendon Repair.核心缝合之外:肌腱修复的新方法
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Dec 17;8(12):e3280. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003280. eCollection 2020 Dec.