Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Department of Cardiology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2018 Jul;93(7):895-903. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.01.031. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
To investigate differences in invasive hemodynamic parameters and outcomes in patients with and without heart failure (HF) symptoms after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation.
We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of 51 symptomatic patients and 50 patients with resolved HF symptoms who underwent right-sided heart catheterization (RHC) after LVAD implantation from March 1, 2007, through June 30, 2016. Patient characteristics and outcomes including all-cause mortality and right ventricular (RV) failure were compared between groups.
Fifty-one patients had development of HF symptoms after LVAD implantation and underwent RHC a mean ± SD of 243.7±288 days postoperatively. Fifty asymptomatic LVAD recipients underwent routine RHC 278.6±205 days after implantation. Compared with patients who had resolved HF symptoms, symptomatic patients were older, more likely to be male, and more likely to have ischemic cardiomyopathy. Symptomatic patients had higher right atrial pressure (P<.001), mean pulmonary arterial pressure (P<.001), and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (P<.001). Improvements in right atrial pressure, mean pulmonary arterial pressure, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure before and after LVAD implantation were less remarkable in symptomatic patients. The frequency of RV dysfunction was significantly higher among symptomatic patients than patients with resolved HF symptoms (P=.001). Symptomatic patients displayed significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.3-6.5; P=.007) and RV failure (hazard ratio, 6.2; 95% CI, 1.3-29.7; P=.02) independent of other predictors of outcome.
Patients with recurrent HF symptoms after LVAD implantation display more profound hemodynamic derangements, greater burden of RV failure, and increased rates of all-cause mortality compared with LVAD recipients with resolved HF symptoms.
研究左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入后伴或不伴心力衰竭(HF)症状患者的侵入性血流动力学参数和结局的差异。
我们对 2007 年 3 月 1 日至 2016 年 6 月 30 日期间因 LVAD 植入后出现 HF 症状而行右侧心导管检查(RHC)的 51 例有症状患者和 50 例 HF 症状已缓解患者进行了单中心回顾性分析。比较两组患者的特征和结局,包括全因死亡率和右心室(RV)衰竭。
51 例患者在 LVAD 植入后出现 HF 症状,并在术后平均 243.7±288 天行 RHC。50 例无症状 LVAD 受者在植入后 278.6±205 天行常规 RHC。与 HF 症状已缓解的患者相比,有症状患者年龄更大,更可能为男性,且更可能患有缺血性心肌病。有症状患者的右心房压(P<.001)、平均肺动脉压(P<.001)和肺毛细血管楔压(P<.001)更高。LVAD 植入前后右心房压、平均肺动脉压和肺毛细血管楔压的改善在有症状患者中不明显。与 HF 症状已缓解的患者相比,有症状患者的 RV 功能障碍发生率明显更高(P=.001)。有症状患者的全因死亡率(危险比,3.0;95%CI,1.3-6.5;P=.007)和 RV 衰竭(危险比,6.2;95%CI,1.3-29.7;P=.02)的风险显著高于其他结局预测因素。
与 HF 症状已缓解的 LVAD 受者相比,LVAD 植入后出现复发性 HF 症状的患者显示出更严重的血流动力学紊乱、更大的 RV 衰竭负担以及更高的全因死亡率。