Suppr超能文献

右心房压力波预测左心室辅助装置植入后右心衰竭。

Right Atrial Pressure Waveform Predicts Right Ventricular Failure After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.

Department of Cardiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Nov;108(5):1361-1368. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.04.050. Epub 2019 Jun 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Right ventricular failure (RVF) is one of the major adverse events after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Right ventricle (RV) distensibility plays a key role in the preload reserve capability and in RV ejection through the Frank-Starling mechanism. However, there are no studies focusing on the relationship between RVF and RV distensibility.

METHODS

Between 2013 and 2017, 115 consecutive patients underwent continuous-flow LVAD implantation at Osaka University Hospital. Of these, 71 who recorded preoperative right atrial pressure waveform were included. We assessed RV distensibility and the incidence and risk factors for RVF, which was defined as the requirement for a right ventricular assist device or 14 or more consecutive days of inotropic support required postoperatively, or both. A distensible RV was interpreted if the right atrial pressure waveform showed a dominant "Y" descent that was equal to or deeper than the "X" descent.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients (45%) had RVF after LVAD implantation. Among the patients with RVF, 4 required right ventricular assist device support and all of them had a less distensible RV. Multivariate analysis revealed that a less distensible RV (odds ratio 10.5, 95% confidence interval, 1.75 to 63.5, P = .003) and an elevated level of central venous pressure/pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (odds ratio 2.02, 95% confidence interval, 1.20 to 3.40, P = .002) were independent risk factors for RVF after LVAD implantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Less distensible RV and elevated central venous pressure/pulmonary capillary wedge pressure level were significant risks for RVF after LVAD implantation. This result suggested that analysis of not only the hemodynamic numbers but also the pattern of waveforms are important to assess risk for RVF in LVAD candidates.

摘要

背景

右心室衰竭(RVF)是左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入后的主要不良事件之一。右心室(RV)的可扩张性在RV 的前负荷储备能力和通过Frank-Starling 机制的 RV 射血中起着关键作用。然而,目前还没有研究关注 RVF 与 RV 可扩张性之间的关系。

方法

2013 年至 2017 年,大阪大学医院连续收治了 115 例接受连续血流 LVAD 植入的患者。其中,71 例记录了术前右心房压力波形,纳入本研究。我们评估了 RV 的可扩张性以及 RVF 的发生率和危险因素,RVF 定义为需要 RVAD 或术后 14 天以上持续使用正性肌力药物支持,或两者兼有。如果右心房压力波形显示出与“X”下降相等或更深的主导性“Y”下降,则认为 RV 是可扩张的。

结果

LVAD 植入后 32 例(45%)患者发生 RVF。在发生 RVF 的患者中,有 4 例需要 RVAD 支持,且所有患者的 RV 均不可扩张。多变量分析显示,RV 不可扩张(比值比 10.5,95%置信区间,1.75 至 63.5,P=.003)和中心静脉压/肺毛细血管楔压升高(比值比 2.02,95%置信区间,1.20 至 3.40,P=.002)是 LVAD 植入后 RVF 的独立危险因素。

结论

RV 不可扩张和中心静脉压/肺毛细血管楔压升高是 LVAD 植入后 RVF 的显著危险因素。这一结果表明,在评估 LVAD 候选者的 RVF 风险时,不仅要分析血流动力学参数,还要分析波形模式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验