Kainer David, Stone Eric A, Padovan Amanda, Foley William J, Külheim Carsten
Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Acton ACT 2601, Australia
Center for BioEnergy Innovation, Biosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831.
G3 (Bethesda). 2018 Jul 31;8(8):2573-2583. doi: 10.1534/g3.118.200443.
Unlike agricultural crops, most forest species have not had millennia of improvement through phenotypic selection, but can contribute energy and material resources and possibly help alleviate climate change. Yield gains similar to those achieved in agricultural crops over millennia could be made in forestry species with the use of genomic methods in a much shorter time frame. Here we compare various methods of genomic prediction for eight traits related to foliar terpene yield in , a tree grown predominantly for the production of Eucalyptus oil. The genomic markers used in this study are derived from shallow whole genome sequencing of a population of 480 trees. We compare the traditional pedigree-based additive best linear unbiased predictors (ABLUP), genomic BLUP (GBLUP), BayesB genomic prediction model, and a form of GBLUP based on weighting markers according to their influence on traits (BLUP|GA). Predictive ability is assessed under varying marker densities of 10,000, 100,000 and 500,000 SNPs. Our results show that BayesB and BLUP|GA perform best across the eight traits. Predictive ability was higher for individual terpene traits, such as foliar α-pinene and 1,8-cineole concentration (0.59 and 0.73, respectively), than aggregate traits such as total foliar oil concentration (0.38). This is likely a function of the trait architecture and markers used. BLUP|GA was the best model for the two biomass related traits, height and 1 year change in height (0.25 and 0.19, respectively). Predictive ability increased with marker density for most traits, but with diminishing returns. The results of this study are a solid foundation for yield improvement of essential oil producing eucalypts. New markets such as biopolymers and terpene-derived biofuels could benefit from rapid yield increases in undomesticated oil-producing species.
与农作物不同,大多数森林物种并未经过数千年来通过表型选择进行的改良,但它们能够贡献能量和物质资源,并有可能有助于缓解气候变化。利用基因组方法,在更短的时间内就可以在林业物种中实现与农作物数千年来所取得的产量增长相类似的增长。在此,我们比较了与主要用于生产桉叶油的蓝桉叶中萜类化合物产量相关的八个性状的各种基因组预测方法。本研究中使用的基因组标记源自对480棵树木群体进行的浅层全基因组测序。我们比较了传统的基于系谱的加性最佳线性无偏预测器(ABLUP)、基因组BLUP(GBLUP)、贝叶斯B基因组预测模型,以及一种根据标记对性状的影响进行加权的GBLUP形式(BLUP|GA)。在10000、100000和500000个单核苷酸多态性(SNP)的不同标记密度下评估预测能力。我们的结果表明,贝叶斯B和BLUP|GA在这八个性状上表现最佳。对于单个萜类性状,如叶中α-蒎烯和1,8-桉叶素浓度(分别为0.59和0.73),其预测能力高于总叶油浓度等综合性状(0.38)。这可能是性状结构和所用标记的函数。BLUP|GA是与两个生物量相关性状(树高和树高一年变化量,分别为0.25和0.19)的最佳模型。对于大多数性状,预测能力随标记密度的增加而提高,但收益递减。本研究结果为提高产精油桉树种的产量奠定了坚实基础。生物聚合物和萜类衍生生物燃料等新市场可能会受益于未驯化产油物种产量的快速提高。