Department of Psychology, James Cook University Singapore, 149 Sims Drive, Singapore 387380, Singapore.
Department of Psychological Medicine, National University Hospital, Level 9, NUHS Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119228, Singapore.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jun 11;15(6):1231. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061231.
: Recent studies have shown that not every depressed patient responds to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, and some of those who do relapse upon termination. Due to its dual focus on the past and present, Schema Model (SM) represents a promising alternative model to understand depression. However, studies examining SM often operationalize the same construct differently, resulting in inconsistent evidence of change. There is no known review clarifying (1) how best to assess schema constructs; and (2) the relevant pathways to depression, without which, the empirical basis for SM cannot be examined. : A scoping review was conducted in accordance to PRISMA guidelines to map evidence of the relationship between constructs of SM and depression, and measures used to assess the constructs. 2463 articles were identified with 49 primary research studies included. This paper is a subset of the scoping review and focuses on the five studies examining effects of temperament on depression. : Two models were used to operationalize temperament: The Five Factor Model (FFM) and the Psychobiological Model of Personality (PBM). The variables of neuroticism and harm avoidance were positively associated with depressive symptoms while self-directedness and cooperativeness were negative associated with depressive symptoms. : The FFM is more suited to operationalize temperament in studies of SM and depression due to its theoretical compatibility with SM, established psychometric properties of its measures, and widespread use among studies of SM. Out of the five factors in the FFM, only neuroticism exerts direct and indirect effects on depression. These findings are limited by homogeneous sampling, hence future research studies should consider extending it to adult clinical samples. Nevertheless, this review represents a first step in the systematic examination of the empirical basis of SM and a contribution to treatment innovation and practice for depression.
: 最近的研究表明,并非每个抑郁患者都对认知行为疗法有反应,有些患者在治疗结束后会复发。由于其同时关注过去和现在,模式模型(SM)代表了一种理解抑郁症的有前途的替代模型。然而,研究 SM 的研究经常以不同的方式操作相同的结构,导致变化的证据不一致。目前还没有已知的综述来澄清(1)如何最好地评估模式结构;以及(2)与抑郁症相关的途径,没有这些,就无法检查 SM 的经验基础。 : 本研究按照 PRISMA 指南进行了范围界定综述,以绘制 SM 结构与抑郁之间关系的证据以及用于评估这些结构的测量方法。共确定了 2463 篇文章,其中包括 49 项主要研究。本文是范围界定综述的一部分,重点关注了五项研究,探讨了气质对抑郁的影响。 : 有两种模型用于操作气质:五因素模型(FFM)和人格的心理生物学模型(PBM)。神经质和回避性与抑郁症状呈正相关,而自我定向和合作性与抑郁症状呈负相关。 : FFM 更适合在 SM 和抑郁研究中操作气质,因为它与 SM 的理论兼容性、其测量的既定心理测量特性以及在 SM 研究中的广泛应用。在 FFM 的五个因素中,只有神经质对抑郁有直接和间接影响。这些发现受到同质抽样的限制,因此未来的研究应考虑将其扩展到成人临床样本。尽管如此,本综述代表了对 SM 的经验基础进行系统检查的第一步,也是对抑郁治疗创新和实践的贡献。