Aubry Alexandre, Bourdin Béatrice
CRP-CPO EA 7273, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France.
Front Psychol. 2018 May 28;9:830. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00830. eCollection 2018.
Intellectual giftedness is usually defined in terms of having a very high Intellectual Quotient (IQ). The intellectual capacity is assessed by a standardized test such as the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC). However, the identification of intellectually gifted children (IGC) often remains time-consuming. A short-form WISC can be used as a screening instrument. The practitioners and researchers in this field can then make a more in-depth evaluation of the IGC's cognitive and socioemotional characteristics if needed. The aim of our study is thus to determine the best short tests, in terms of their psychometric qualities, for the identification of IGC. The current study is composed of three-step analyses. Firstly, we created nine IQs short forms (IQ) with 2-subtests, and nine IQ with 4-subtests from the WISC-IV (Wechsler, 2005). Secondly, we estimated psychometric parameters (i.e., reliability and validity) from empirical and simulated dataset with WISC-IV. The difference in the estimation of psychometric qualities of each IQ from the simulated data is very close to those derived from empirical data. We thus selected the three best IQ based on these psychometrics parameters estimated from simulated datasets. For each selected short form of the WISC-IV, we estimated the screening quality in our sample of IGC. Thirdly, we created IQ with 2- and 4-subtests from the WISC-V (Wechsler, 2016) with simulated dataset. We then highlighted the three best short forms of WISC-V based on the estimated psychometric parameters. The results are interpreted in terms of validity, reliability and screening quality of IGC. In spite of the important changes in the WISC-V, our findings show that the 2-subtest form, + , and 4-subtest form, + + + , are the most efficient to identify the IGC at the two recent versions of Wechsler scales. Finally, we discuss the advantages and drawbacks of a brief assessment of intellectual aptitudes for the identification of the IGC.
智力超常通常是根据拥有非常高的智商(IQ)来定义的。智力能力通过标准化测试来评估,如韦氏儿童智力量表(WISC)。然而,识别智力超常儿童(IGC)往往很耗时。WISC的简版可作为一种筛查工具。如果需要,该领域的从业者和研究人员随后可以对IGC的认知和社会情感特征进行更深入的评估。因此,我们研究的目的是确定就心理测量质量而言,用于识别IGC的最佳简短测试。当前的研究由三步分析组成。首先,我们从WISC-IV(韦氏,2005年)创建了九个包含2个分测验的智商简版(IQ)和九个包含4个分测验的智商简版。其次,我们从WISC-IV的实证和模拟数据集中估计心理测量参数(即信度和效度)。从模拟数据中对每个智商的心理测量质量的估计差异与从实证数据中得出的差异非常接近。因此,我们根据从模拟数据集中估计的这些心理测量参数选择了三个最佳智商简版。对于每个选定的WISC-IV简版,我们在我们的IGC样本中估计了筛查质量。第三,我们使用模拟数据集从WISC-V(韦氏,2016年)创建了包含2个和4个分测验的智商简版。然后,我们根据估计的心理测量参数突出显示了WISC-V的三个最佳简版。结果从IGC的效度、信度和筛查质量方面进行了解释。尽管WISC-V有重大变化,但我们的研究结果表明,2分测验形式,+ ,以及4分测验形式,+ + + ,在韦氏量表的两个最新版本中是识别IGC最有效的。最后,我们讨论了用于识别IGC的智力能力简短评估的优缺点。