1Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center,Divisions of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control/Hospital Epidemiology,Boston,Massachusetts.
2Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System,Boston,Massachusetts.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018 Aug;39(8):947-954. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.107. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) is a safe and effective alternative to prolonged inpatient stays for patients requiring long-term intravenous antimicrobials, but antimicrobial-associated adverse events remain a significant challenge. Thus, we sought to measure the association between choice of antimicrobial agent (vancomycin vs daptomycin) and incidence of adverse drug events (ADEs).
Patients receiving OPAT treatment with vancomycin or daptomycin for skin and soft-tissue infections, bone and joint infections, endocarditis, and bacteremia or endovascular infections during the period from July 1, 2013, through September 30, 2016, were included. Demographic and clinical data were abstracted from the medical record. Logistic regression was used to compare ADEs requiring a change in or early discontinuation of therapy, hospital readmission, and emergency room visits between groups. Time from OPAT enrollment to ADE was compared using the log-rank test.
In total, 417 patients were included: 312 (74·8%) received vancomycin and 105 (25·2%) received daptomycin. After adjusting for age, Charlson comorbidity index, location of OPAT treatment, receipt of combination therapy with either β-lactam or fluoroquinolone, renal function, and availability of safety labs, patients receiving vancomycin had significantly higher incidence of ADEs (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3·71; 95% CI, 1·64-8·40). ADEs occurred later in the treatment course for patients treated with daptomycin (P<·01). Rates of readmission and emergency room visits were similar.
In the OPAT setting, vancomycin use was associated with higher incidence of ADEs than daptomycin use. This finding is an important policy consideration for programs aiming to optimize outcomes and minimize cost. Careful selection of gram-positive agents for prolonged treatment is necessary to limit toxicity.
门诊患者的静脉输注抗菌治疗(OPAT)是一种安全有效的替代方法,适用于需要长期静脉使用抗菌药物的患者,而避免长期住院,但抗菌药物相关的不良事件仍然是一个重大挑战。因此,我们试图衡量抗菌药物选择(万古霉素与达托霉素)与不良药物事件(ADE)发生率之间的关联。
纳入 2013 年 7 月 1 日至 2016 年 9 月 30 日期间接受 OPAT 治疗的皮肤软组织感染、骨与关节感染、心内膜炎、菌血症或血管内感染的患者,使用万古霉素或达托霉素治疗。从病历中提取人口统计学和临床数据。使用逻辑回归比较两组之间需要改变或提前停药、住院再入院和急诊就诊的 ADE。使用对数秩检验比较从 OPAT 登记到 ADE 的时间。
共纳入 417 例患者:312 例(74.8%)接受万古霉素治疗,105 例(25.2%)接受达托霉素治疗。在校正年龄、Charlson 合并症指数、OPAT 治疗地点、β-内酰胺或氟喹诺酮联合治疗的接受情况、肾功能和安全实验室的可用性后,接受万古霉素治疗的患者 ADE 发生率显著更高(调整后比值比 [aOR],3.71;95%CI,1.64-8.40)。达托霉素治疗的患者 ADE 发生在治疗过程的后期(P<0.01)。再入院和急诊就诊的发生率相似。
在 OPAT 环境中,与达托霉素相比,万古霉素的使用与更高的 ADE 发生率相关。这一发现对于旨在优化结果和降低成本的项目来说是一个重要的政策考虑因素。为了限制毒性,需要仔细选择用于长期治疗的革兰氏阳性药物。