Suppr超能文献

2016 年在接受 Title X 基金资助的医疗机构寻求避孕服务的客户中,健康保险的使用情况。

Use of Health Insurance Among Clients Seeking Contraceptive Services at Title X-Funded Facilities in 2016.

机构信息

Principal research scientist, at the Guttmacher Institute, New York.

Senior research associate, at the Guttmacher Institute, New York.

出版信息

Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2018 Sep;50(3):101-109. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12061. Epub 2018 Jun 12.

Abstract

CONTEXT

As federal initiatives aim to fundamentally alter or dismantle the Affordable Care Act (ACA), evidence regarding the use of insurance among clients obtaining contraceptive care at Title X-funded facilities under ACA guidelines is essential to understanding what is at stake.

METHODS

A nationally representative sample of 2,911 clients seeking contraceptive care at 43 Title X-funded sites in 2016 completed a survey assessing their characteristics and insurance coverage and use. Chi-square tests for independence with adjustments for the sampling design were conducted to determine differences in insurance coverage and use across demographic characteristics and facility types.

RESULTS

Most clients (71%) had some form of public or private health insurance, and most of these (83%) planned to use it to pay for their services. Foreign-born clients were less likely than U.S.-born clients to have coverage (46% vs. 75%) and to use it (78% vs. 85%). Clients with private insurance were less likely than those with public insurance to plan to use their insurance (75% vs. 91%). More than one-quarter of clients not planning to use existing insurance for services indicated that the reason was that someone might find out.

CONCLUSION

Coverage gaps persist among individuals seeking contraceptive care within the Title X network, despite evidence indicating increases in health insurance coverage among this population since implementation of the ACA. Future research should explore the impact of altering or eliminating the ACA both on the Title X provider network and on the individuals who rely on it.

摘要

背景

随着联邦政府的各项倡议旨在从根本上改变或废除《平价医疗法案》(ACA),了解获得 ACA 指导方针下的计划生育服务 Title X 基金资助的客户在保险使用方面的证据对于理解利害关系至关重要。

方法

2016 年,对在 43 个 Title X 基金资助的地点寻求避孕护理的 2911 名客户进行了一项全国代表性抽样调查,评估了他们的特征、保险覆盖范围和使用情况。采用调整抽样设计的独立性卡方检验来确定在人口统计学特征和机构类型方面保险覆盖范围和使用情况的差异。

结果

大多数客户(71%)拥有某种形式的公共或私人医疗保险,其中大多数(83%)计划使用该保险来支付服务费用。外国出生的客户比美国出生的客户更有可能没有保险(46%比 75%),也更不可能使用保险(78%比 85%)。拥有私人保险的客户比拥有公共保险的客户更不可能计划使用他们的保险(75%比 91%)。超过四分之一的客户表示,他们不打算将现有的保险用于服务,原因是有人可能会发现。

结论

尽管有证据表明,自《平价医疗法案》实施以来,计划生育服务的 Title X 网络中的个人的医疗保险覆盖率有所增加,但仍存在保险覆盖范围的差距。未来的研究应探讨修改或取消《平价医疗法案》对 Title X 提供者网络以及依赖该网络的个人的影响。

相似文献

1
Use of Health Insurance Among Clients Seeking Contraceptive Services at Title X-Funded Facilities in 2016.
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2018 Sep;50(3):101-109. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12061. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
2
Family Planning Confidential: A Qualitative Research Study on the Implications of the Affordable Care Act.
J Adolesc Health. 2018 Dec;63(6):773-778. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.06.020. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
3
Trends in Health Insurance Coverage of Title X Family Planning Program Clients, 2005-2015.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018 May;27(5):684-690. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6465. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
4
Trends in Receipt of Contraceptive Services: Young Women in the U.S., 2002-2015.
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Mar;56(3):343-351. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.10.018. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
5
Insurance-related Practices at Title X-funded Family Planning Centers under the Affordable Care Act: Survey and Interview Findings.
Womens Health Issues. 2018 Jan-Feb;28(1):21-28. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2017.09.007. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
7
Clinic provision of contraceptive services to managed care enrollees.
Fam Plann Perspect. 1998 Jul-Aug;30(4):156-62.
8
Family planning clinic services in the United States, 1994.
Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 May-Jun;28(3):92-100.
9
Title X-Funded Health Center Staff Members' Perspectives on Barriers to Insurance Use For Confidential Family Planning Services.
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2018 Jun;50(2):51-57. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12054. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
10
Perceived and insurance-related barriers to the provision of contraceptive services in U.S. abortion care settings.
Womens Health Issues. 2011 May-Jun;21(3 Suppl):S26-31. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2011.01.009.

引用本文的文献

2
Measuring abortion in claims data: What is the state of the science?
Contraception. 2025 Feb;142:110750. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110750. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
3
Financial Instability and Delays in Access to Sexual and Reproductive Health Care Due to COVID-19.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2022 Apr;31(4):469-479. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2021.0493. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
4
Accessibility of federally funded family planning services in South Carolina and Alabama.
Prev Med Rep. 2021 Mar 7;22:101343. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101343. eCollection 2021 Jun.
5
Contraceptive Method Uptake at Title X Health Centers in Utah.
Womens Health Issues. 2021 May-Jun;31(3):219-226. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2021.01.003. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
9
Evaluation of Medicaid Expansion Under the Affordable Care Act and Contraceptive Care in US Community Health Centers.
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e206874. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.6874.

本文引用的文献

1
Adolescents' and Young Adults' Reports of Barriers to Confidential Health Care and Receipt of Contraceptive Services.
J Adolesc Health. 2018 Jan;62(1):36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.10.011. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
2
Chilling Effect? Post-Election Health Care Use by Undocumented and Mixed-Status Families.
N Engl J Med. 2017 Mar 23;376(12):e20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1700829. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
3
Does Churning in Medicaid Affect Health Care Use?
Med Care. 2016 May;54(5):483-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000509.
5
Confidential reproductive health care for adolescents.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Oct;17(5):456-60. doi: 10.1097/01.gco.0000178335.36140.49.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验