• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

平价医疗法案下的医疗补助扩张评估和美国社区卫生中心的避孕服务。

Evaluation of Medicaid Expansion Under the Affordable Care Act and Contraceptive Care in US Community Health Centers.

机构信息

Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.

OHSU-PSU School of Public Health, Portland, Oregon.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e206874. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.6874.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.6874
PMID:32496568
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7273194/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Use of effective contraception decreases unintended pregnancy. It is not known whether Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act increased use of contraception for women who are underserved in the US health care safety net.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association of Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act with changes in use of contraception among patients at risk of pregnancy at US community health centers, with the hypothesis that Medicaid expansion would be associated with increases in use of the most effective contraceptive methods (long-acting reversible contraception).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a participant-level retrospective cross-sectional study comparing receipt of contraception before (2013) vs immediately after (2014) and a longer time after (2016) Medicaid expansion. Electronic health record data from a clinical research network of community health centers across 24 states were included. The sample included all female patients ages 15 to 44 years at risk for pregnancy, with an ambulatory care visit at a participating community health center during the study period (315 clinics in expansion states and 165 clinics in nonexpansion states).

EXPOSURES

Medicaid expansion status (by state).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Two National Quality Forum-endorsed contraception quality metrics, calculated annually: the proportion of women at risk of pregnancy who received (1) either a moderately effective or most effective method (hormonal and long-acting reversible contraception) methods and (2) the most effective method (long-acting reversible contraception).

RESULTS

The sample included 310 132 women from expansion states and 235 408 women from nonexpansion states. The absolute adjusted increase in use of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods was 0.58 (95% CI, 0.13-1.05) percentage points greater among women in expansion states compared with nonexpansion states in 2014 and 1.19 (95% CI, 0.41-1.96) percentage points larger in 2016. Among adolescents, the association was larger, particularly in the longer term (2014 vs 2013: absolute difference-in-difference, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.30-1.30] percentage points; 2016 vs 2013: absolute difference, 1.79 [95% CI, 0.88-2.70] percentage points). Women from expansion states who received care at a Title X clinic had the highest percentage of women receiving most effective contraceptive methods compared with non-Title X clinics and nonexpansion states.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, Medicaid expansion was associated with an increase in use of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods among women at risk of pregnancy seeking care in the US safety net system, and gains were greatest among adolescents.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a26b/7273194/58ffa2bdba34/jamanetwopen-3-e206874-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a26b/7273194/a12c4409e1b7/jamanetwopen-3-e206874-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a26b/7273194/58ffa2bdba34/jamanetwopen-3-e206874-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a26b/7273194/a12c4409e1b7/jamanetwopen-3-e206874-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a26b/7273194/58ffa2bdba34/jamanetwopen-3-e206874-g002.jpg

重要性

使用有效的避孕措施可以降低非意愿妊娠的发生。目前尚不清楚《平价医疗法案》下的医疗补助(Medicaid)扩面是否增加了美国医疗保障安全网中服务不足的女性对避孕措施的使用。

目的

评估《平价医疗法案》下的医疗补助扩面与美国社区卫生中心有妊娠风险的患者避孕措施使用变化之间的关联,假设医疗补助扩面将与最有效的避孕方法(长效可逆避孕措施)的使用增加相关。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项参与者水平的回顾性横断面研究,比较了在医疗补助扩面之前(2013 年)、之后(2014 年)和之后较长时间(2016 年)接受避孕措施的情况。研究纳入了来自 24 个州临床研究网络中社区卫生中心的电子健康记录数据。样本包括所有年龄在 15 至 44 岁之间有妊娠风险的女性,她们在研究期间在参与社区卫生中心进行了门诊就诊(扩张州有 315 个诊所,非扩张州有 165 个诊所)。

暴露情况

医疗补助扩面情况(按州划分)。

主要结果和措施

每年计算两个国家质量论坛认可的避孕质量指标:有妊娠风险的女性中(1)使用了中度有效或最有效的方法(激素和长效可逆避孕措施)和(2)使用了最有效的方法(长效可逆避孕措施)的比例。

结果

样本包括来自扩张州的 310132 名女性和来自非扩张州的 235408 名女性。与非扩张州相比,扩张州在 2014 年和 2016 年使用长效可逆避孕措施的比例分别增加了 0.58(95%置信区间,0.13-1.05)和 1.19(95%置信区间,0.41-1.96)个百分点。在青少年中,这种关联更大,尤其是在较长时间内(2014 年与 2013 年相比:绝对差异,0.80[95%置信区间,0.30-1.30]个百分点;2016 年与 2013 年相比:绝对差异,1.79[95%置信区间,0.88-2.70]个百分点)。与非 Title X 诊所和非扩张州相比,来自扩张州并在 Title X 诊所接受治疗的女性使用最有效的避孕方法的比例最高。

结论和相关性

在这项研究中,医疗补助扩面与美国安全网系统中寻求治疗的有妊娠风险的女性使用长效可逆避孕措施的增加有关,青少年中的增幅最大。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Medicaid Expansion Under the Affordable Care Act and Contraceptive Care in US Community Health Centers.平价医疗法案下的医疗补助扩张评估和美国社区卫生中心的避孕服务。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e206874. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.6874.
2
Payment for Contraceptive Services in Safety Net Clinics: Roles of Affordable Care Act, Title X, and State Programs.安全网诊所避孕服务付费:平价医疗法案、《计划生育法》和州计划的作用。
Med Care. 2020 May;58(5):453-460. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001309.
3
The Impact of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid Expansion on Visit Rates for Diabetes in Safety Net Health Centers.平价医疗法案(ACA)医疗补助扩大对安全网医疗中心糖尿病就诊率的影响。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2018 Nov-Dec;31(6):905-916. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.06.180075.
4
Study protocol: a mixed-methods study of women's healthcare in the safety net after Affordable Care Act implementation - EVERYWOMAN.研究方案:平价医疗法案实施后安全网中妇女保健的混合方法研究 - EVERYWOMAN。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Jun 11;17(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0445-y.
5
Medicaid Expansion at Title X Clinics: Client Volume, Payer Mix, and Contraceptive Method Type.医疗补助扩大计划在 X 标题诊所:客户量,支付者组合和避孕方法类型。
Med Care. 2019 Jun;57(6):437-443. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001120.
6
Dental Outcomes After Medicaid Insurance Coverage Expansion Under the Affordable Care Act.平价医疗法案实施后医疗补助保险覆盖范围扩大对牙科治疗效果的影响。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2124144. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.24144.
7
Impacts of the Affordable Care Act on Receipt of Women's Preventive Services in Community Health Centers in Medicaid Expansion and Nonexpansion States.平价医疗法案对医疗补助扩张和非扩张州社区卫生中心妇女预防服务的影响。
Womens Health Issues. 2021 Jan-Feb;31(1):9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2020.08.011. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
8
Association of Medicaid vs Marketplace Eligibility on Maternal Coverage and Access With Prenatal and Postpartum Care.医疗补助与市场合格性对产妇保险和医疗服务获取的影响:产前和产后护理。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2137383. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.37383.
9
Surveillance for Health Care Access and Health Services Use, Adults Aged 18-64 Years - Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2014.18-64岁成年人医疗保健可及性与医疗服务利用情况监测——美国行为危险因素监测系统,2014年
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017 Feb 24;66(7):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6607a1.
10
Association of Medicaid Expansion Under the Affordable Care Act With Stage at Diagnosis and Time to Treatment Initiation for Patients With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.平价医疗法案下医疗补助扩大计划与头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者诊断分期和治疗开始时间的关联。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Mar 1;146(3):247-255. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2019.4310.

引用本文的文献

1
Impacts of Medicaid Expansion on Contraceptive Use Among Women in Neighborhoods of Racialized Socioeconomic Deprivation in the United States.美国医疗补助扩大计划对种族化社会经济贫困社区女性避孕措施使用情况的影响。
Womens Health Issues. 2025 Aug 14. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2025.07.002.
2
Latina Immigrants' Experiences Accessing Contraceptive Services Beyond the Postpartum Period and the Role of Community and Pediatric Settings.拉丁裔移民产后获取避孕服务的经历以及社区和儿科机构的作用。
Qual Health Res. 2025 May 23:10497323251336577. doi: 10.1177/10497323251336577.
3
Double vulnerability? Examining the effect of living in nonmetropolitan areas within non-expansion Medicaid states on health status among working-age adults in the United States, 2022-2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Patterns and trends in contraceptive use among women attending Title X clinics and a national sample of low-income women.参加第十类诊所的女性以及低收入女性全国样本中避孕措施使用的模式与趋势。
Contracept X. 2019 Mar 12;1:100004. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2019.100004. eCollection 2019.
2
Payment for Contraceptive Services in Safety Net Clinics: Roles of Affordable Care Act, Title X, and State Programs.安全网诊所避孕服务付费:平价医疗法案、《计划生育法》和州计划的作用。
Med Care. 2020 May;58(5):453-460. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001309.
3
Definitions, measurement and indicator selection for quality of care in abortion.
双重脆弱性?研究2022 - 2024年美国非扩张型医疗补助州的非大都市地区居住环境对劳动年龄成年人健康状况的影响。
SSM Popul Health. 2025 Apr 5;30:101798. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2025.101798. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Post- Abortion Restrictions and the Families They Leave Behind.堕胎后限制措施及其对家庭的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2024 Oct;114(10):1043-1050. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307792.
5
Is use of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives (LARC) associated with reduced well-woman visits and STI testing? Evidence from female Medicaid clients aged 15-24 in Delaware.长效可逆避孕措施(LARC)的使用是否与减少常规妇科检查和性传播感染检测有关?来自特拉华州 15-24 岁女性医疗补助客户的证据。
Prev Med. 2024 Oct;187:108089. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108089. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
6
Postpartum long-acting reversible contraceptive adoption after a statewide initiative.一项全州范围的倡议实施后产后长效可逆避孕方法的采用情况
Health Serv Res. 2024 Jun;59(3):e14300. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14300. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
7
Contraceptive Provision to Women With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Enrolled in Medicaid.为参加医疗补助计划的智障和发育障碍女性提供避孕措施。
Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Dec 1;142(6):1477-1485. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005421. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
8
Contraception use and satisfaction among mothers with low income: Evidence from the Baby's First Years study.低收入母亲的避孕措施使用和满意度:来自“婴儿第一年研究”的证据。
Contraception. 2024 Jan;129:110297. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110297. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
9
Association of State Funding for Comprehensive Reproductive Health Care With Use of Contraception Among Latina Patients and Non-Latina Patients in Oregon.美国俄勒冈州的综合生殖健康护理的州政府资助与拉丁裔患者和非拉丁裔患者避孕措施使用率的相关性研究。
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Jul 7;4(7):e232144. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.2144.
10
Mapping Long-acting Reversible Contraceptive Interventions to the Social Ecological Model: A Scoping Review.长效可逆避孕措施与社会生态模型的关联:范围综述。
Womens Health Issues. 2023 Sep-Oct;33(5):497-507. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2023.06.005. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
流产护理质量的定义、衡量标准和指标选择。
Contraception. 2019 Nov;100(5):354-359. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.07.006. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
4
Study protocol: a mixed-methods study of women's healthcare in the safety net after Affordable Care Act implementation - EVERYWOMAN.研究方案:平价医疗法案实施后安全网中妇女保健的混合方法研究 - EVERYWOMAN。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Jun 11;17(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0445-y.
5
Medicaid Expansion at Title X Clinics: Client Volume, Payer Mix, and Contraceptive Method Type.医疗补助扩大计划在 X 标题诊所:客户量,支付者组合和避孕方法类型。
Med Care. 2019 Jun;57(6):437-443. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001120.
6
Women's Affordability, Access, and Preventive Care After the Affordable Care Act.平价医疗法案实施后女性的负担能力、可及性和预防性护理。
Am J Prev Med. 2019 May;56(5):631-638. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.11.028. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
7
The Affordable Care Act and Access to Care for Reproductive-Aged and Pregnant Women in the United States, 2010-2016.《平价医疗法案与 2010-2016 年美国育龄期和孕期女性的医疗服务可及性》
Am J Public Health. 2019 Apr;109(4):565-571. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304928. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
8
Preconception Coverage Before and After the Affordable Care Act Medicaid Expansions.《平价医疗法案》扩大医疗补助计划前后的孕前保险覆盖情况。
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec;132(6):1394-1400. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002972.
9
The Impact of Insurance Coverage on Utilization of Prescription Contraceptives: Evidence from the Affordable Care Act.保险覆盖范围对处方避孕药使用的影响:平价医疗法案的证据。
J Policy Anal Manage. 2018;37(3):571-601.
10
Use of Health Insurance Among Clients Seeking Contraceptive Services at Title X-Funded Facilities in 2016.2016 年在接受 Title X 基金资助的医疗机构寻求避孕服务的客户中,健康保险的使用情况。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2018 Sep;50(3):101-109. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12061. Epub 2018 Jun 12.