Suppr超能文献

1.5 特斯拉磁共振 T2 成像技术在膝关节软骨中的应用:不同采集序列和计算方法的比较。

MRI T2 Mapping of Knee Articular Cartilage Using Different Acquisition Sequences and Calculation Methods at 1.5 Tesla.

机构信息

Tunis University EL Manar, Higher Institute of Medical Technologies of Tunis, Research Laboratory of Biophysics and Medical Technologies, Tunis, Tunisia.

Tunis University EL Manar, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Department of Radiology, Kassab Institute of Orthopedics, Ksar Saïd, Tunis, Tunisia.

出版信息

Med Princ Pract. 2018;27(5):443-450. doi: 10.1159/000490796. Epub 2018 Jun 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to determine how magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisition techniques and calculation methods affect T2 values of knee cartilage at 1.5 tesla and to identify sequences that can be used for high-resolution T2 mapping in short scanning times.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was performed on phantom and 29 patients who underwent MRI of the knee joint at 1.5 tesla. The protocol includes T2 mapping sequences based on Single-Echo Spin Echo (SESE), Multi-Echo Spin Echo (MESE), Fast Spin Echo (FSE) and Turbo Gradient Spin Echo (TGSE). The T2 relaxation times were quantified and evaluated using three calculation methods (MapIt, Syngo Offline and mono-exponential fit). signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) were measured in all sequences. All statistical analyses were performed using the t-test.

RESULTS

The average T2 values in phantom were 41.7 ± 13.8 ms for SESE, 43.2 ± 14.4 ms for MESE, 42.4 ± 14.1 ms for FSE and 44 ± 14.5 ms for TGSE. In the patient study, the mean differences were 6.5 ± 8.2 ms, 7.8 ± 7.6 ms and 8.4 ± 14.2 ms for MESE, FSE and TGSE compared to SESE, respectively; these statistical results were not significantly different (p > 0.05). The comparison between the three calculation methods showed no significant difference (p > 0.05). The t-test showed no significant difference between SNR values for all sequences.

CONCLUSION

T2 values depend not only on the sequence type but also on the calculation method. None of the sequences revealed significant differences compared to the SESE reference sequence. TGSE with its short scanning time can be used for high-resolution T2 mapping.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定磁共振成像(MRI)采集技术和计算方法如何影响 1.5T 膝关节软骨的 T2 值,并确定可用于短扫描时间的高分辨率 T2 映射的序列。

材料与方法

本研究在体模和 29 名 1.5T 膝关节 MRI 检查的患者中进行。该方案包括基于单回波自旋回波(SESE)、多回波自旋回波(MESE)、快速自旋回波(FSE)和涡轮梯度自旋回波(TGSE)的 T2 映射序列。使用三种计算方法(MapIt、Syngo Offline 和单指数拟合)对 T2 弛豫时间进行量化和评估。在所有序列中测量信噪比(SNR)。所有统计分析均使用 t 检验进行。

结果

体模中 SESE、MESE、FSE 和 TGSE 的平均 T2 值分别为 41.7±13.8ms、43.2±14.4ms、42.4±14.1ms 和 44±14.5ms。在患者研究中,与 SESE 相比,MESE、FSE 和 TGSE 的平均差异分别为 6.5±8.2ms、7.8±7.6ms 和 8.4±14.2ms,这些统计结果无显著差异(p>0.05)。三种计算方法的比较无显著差异(p>0.05)。t 检验显示所有序列的 SNR 值无显著差异。

结论

T2 值不仅取决于序列类型,还取决于计算方法。与 SESE 参考序列相比,没有任何序列显示出显著差异。具有短扫描时间的 TGSE 可用于高分辨率 T2 映射。

相似文献

2
A comparative study at 3 T of sequence dependence of T2 quantitation in the knee.3T下膝关节T2定量序列依赖性的比较研究。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Nov;26(9):1215-20. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2008.02.017. Epub 2008 May 23.

引用本文的文献

6
2D versus 3D MRI of osteoarthritis in clinical practice and research.2D 与 3D MRI 在骨关节炎的临床实践和研究中的应用
Skeletal Radiol. 2023 Nov;52(11):2211-2224. doi: 10.1007/s00256-023-04309-4. Epub 2023 Mar 13.

本文引用的文献

6
Comparison of biochemical cartilage imaging techniques at 3 T MRI.3T MRI 下生化软骨成像技术的比较。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014 Oct;22(10):1732-42. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.04.020.
9
T2 values of articular cartilage in clinically relevant subregions of the asymptomatic knee.关节软骨在无症状膝关节相关亚区的 T2 值。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Jun;22(6):1404-14. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2779-2. Epub 2013 Nov 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验