• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多方法补给量估算比较研究的见解

Insights From a Multi-Method Recharge Estimation Comparison Study.

作者信息

Walker David, Parkin Geoff, Schmitter Petra, Gowing John, Tilahun Seifu A, Haile Alemseged T, Yimam Abdu Y

机构信息

School of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

International Water Management Institute (IWMI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

出版信息

Ground Water. 2019 Mar;57(2):245-258. doi: 10.1111/gwat.12801. Epub 2018 Jul 19.

DOI:10.1111/gwat.12801
PMID:29896911
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6849517/
Abstract

Although most recharge estimation studies apply multiple methods to identify the possible range in recharge values, many do not distinguish clearly enough between inherent uncertainty of the methods and other factors affecting the results. We investigated the additional value that can be gained from multi-method recharge studies through insights into hydrogeological understanding, in addition to characterizing uncertainty. Nine separate groundwater recharge estimation methods, with a total of 17 variations, were applied at a shallow aquifer in northwest Ethiopia in the context of the potential for shallow groundwater resource development. These gave a wide range of recharge values from 45 to 814 mm/a. Critical assessment indicated that the results depended on what the recharge represents (actual, potential, minimum recharge or change in aquifer storage), and spatial and temporal scales, as well as uncertainties from application of each method. Important insights into the hydrogeological system were gained from this detailed analysis, which also confirmed that the range of values for actual recharge was reduced to around 280-430 mm/a. This study demonstrates that even when assumptions behind methods are violated, as they often are to some degree especially when data are limited, valuable insights into the hydrogeological system can be gained from application of multiple methods.

摘要

尽管大多数补给量估算研究采用多种方法来确定补给量值的可能范围,但许多研究并未充分区分方法的固有不确定性与影响结果的其他因素。除了描述不确定性之外,我们还通过深入了解水文地质情况,研究了多方法补给量研究能带来的额外价值。在埃塞俄比亚西北部的一个浅层含水层中,针对浅层地下水资源开发潜力的背景,应用了九种单独的地下水补给量估算方法,共17种变体。这些方法得出的补给量值范围很广,从45毫米/年到814毫米/年不等。批判性评估表明,结果取决于补给量所代表的含义(实际的、潜在的、最小补给量或含水层储存量的变化)、空间和时间尺度,以及每种方法应用中的不确定性。通过这一详细分析,我们对水文地质系统有了重要的认识,这也证实了实际补给量的值范围缩小到了约280 - 430毫米/年。这项研究表明,即使方法背后的假设被违反,就像它们在某种程度上经常出现的那样,尤其是在数据有限时,应用多种方法仍能获得有关水文地质系统的宝贵见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694e/6849517/77d6e8e3db1b/GWAT-57-245-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694e/6849517/40f920c70692/GWAT-57-245-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694e/6849517/3a9747e15d0b/GWAT-57-245-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694e/6849517/047563f75469/GWAT-57-245-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694e/6849517/35822116dea7/GWAT-57-245-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694e/6849517/67c382048237/GWAT-57-245-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694e/6849517/77d6e8e3db1b/GWAT-57-245-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694e/6849517/40f920c70692/GWAT-57-245-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694e/6849517/3a9747e15d0b/GWAT-57-245-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694e/6849517/047563f75469/GWAT-57-245-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694e/6849517/35822116dea7/GWAT-57-245-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694e/6849517/67c382048237/GWAT-57-245-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/694e/6849517/77d6e8e3db1b/GWAT-57-245-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Insights From a Multi-Method Recharge Estimation Comparison Study.多方法补给量估算比较研究的见解
Ground Water. 2019 Mar;57(2):245-258. doi: 10.1111/gwat.12801. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
2
Automating Recession Curve Displacement Recharge Estimation.自动进行衰退曲线位移补给量估算
Ground Water. 2017 Jan;55(1):81-87. doi: 10.1111/gwat.12439. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
3
Influence of recharge rates on steady-state plume lengths.补给速率对稳定羽流长度的影响。
J Contam Hydrol. 2020 Nov;235:103709. doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2020.103709. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
4
Multiparameter daily time-series analysis to groundwater recharge assessment in a caldera aquifer: Roccamonfina Volcano, Italy.基于多参数每日时间序列分析的破火山口含水层地下水补给评估:意大利罗卡蒙菲纳火山
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Aug 1;676:501-513. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.327. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
5
Transient Recharge Estimability Through Field-Scale Groundwater Model Calibration.通过现场尺度地下水模型校准实现的瞬态补给可估算性
Ground Water. 2017 Nov;55(6):827-840. doi: 10.1111/gwat.12526. Epub 2017 May 12.
6
Integrating soil water and tracer balances, numerical modelling and GIS tools to estimate regional groundwater recharge: Application to the Alcadozo Aquifer System (SE Spain).整合土壤水和示踪剂平衡、数值模型和 GIS 工具来估算区域地下水补给:以西班牙东南部 Alcadozo 含水层系统为例。
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Oct 15;568:415-432. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.011. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
7
Natural recharge to sustainable yield from the barind aquifer: a tool in preparing effective management plan of groundwater resources.巴林德含水层从自然补给到可持续开采量:制定地下水资源有效管理计划的一种工具。
Water Sci Technol. 2005;52(12):251-8.
8
Noble gas excess air applied to distinguish groundwater recharge conditions.应用惰性气体过量空气来区分地下水补给条件。
Environ Sci Technol. 2007 Mar 15;41(6):1949-55. doi: 10.1021/es061115r.
9
Groundwater recharge and water table response to changing conditions for aquifers at different physiography: The case of a semi-humid river catchment, northwestern highlands of Ethiopia.地下水补给和含水层在不同地貌条件下变化的水位响应:以埃塞俄比亚西北部高地半湿润河流流域为例。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Dec 15;748:142243. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142243. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
10
Assessment of artificial groundwater recharge potential through estimation of permeability values from infiltration and aquifer tests in unconsolidated alluvial formations in coastal areas.评估沿海地区松散冲积地层中渗透值和含水层试验的人工地下水补给潜力。
Environ Monit Assess. 2018 Dec 28;191(1):31. doi: 10.1007/s10661-018-7173-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying the spatial pattern and driving factors of nitrate in groundwater using a novel framework of interpretable stacking ensemble learning.利用可解释堆叠集成学习的新框架识别地下水中硝酸盐的空间格局和驱动因素。
Environ Geochem Health. 2024 Oct 29;46(11):482. doi: 10.1007/s10653-024-02201-1.
2
Estimation of groundwater recharge variability using a GIS-based distributed water balance model in Makutupora basin, Tanzania.利用基于地理信息系统的分布式水平衡模型估算坦桑尼亚马库图波拉盆地的地下水补给变化
Heliyon. 2023 Mar 31;9(4):e15117. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15117. eCollection 2023 Apr.
3
Evaluating land suitability and water availability for surface irrigation in the Abbay basin of Ethiopia.

本文引用的文献

1
Regional estimation of base recharge to ground water using water balance and a base-flow index.利用水平衡和基流指数对地下水的基流补给进行区域估算。
Ground Water. 2003 Jul-Aug;41(4):504-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2003.tb02384.x.
评估埃塞俄比亚阿巴伊河流域地表灌溉的土地适宜性和水资源可利用性。
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Dec 14;9(12):220674. doi: 10.1098/rsos.220674. eCollection 2022 Dec.