• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交机器人对老年人的有效性:随机对照研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。

The Effectiveness of Social Robots for Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies.

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Nathan Campus, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

Gerontologist. 2019 Jan 9;59(1):e37-e51. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny046.

DOI:10.1093/geront/gny046
PMID:29897445
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Social robots may promote the health of older adults by increasing their perceived emotional support and social interaction. This review aims to summarize the effectiveness of social robots on outcomes (psychological, physiological, quality of life, or medications) of older adults from randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A mixed-method systematic review of RCTs meeting the study inclusion criteria was undertaken. Eight databases were electronically searched up to September 2017. Participants' characteristics, intervention features, and outcome data were retrieved. The mean difference and standardized mean difference with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were synthesized to pool the effect size.

RESULTS

A total of 13 articles from 11 RCTs were identified from 2,204 articles, of which 9 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Risk of bias was relatively high in allocation concealment and blinding. Social robots appeared to have positive impacts on agitation, anxiety, and quality of life for older adults but no statistical significance was found in the meta-analysis. However, results from a narrative review indicated that social robot interactions could improve engagement, interaction, and stress indicators, as well as reduce loneliness and the use of medications for older adults.

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Social robots appear to have the potential to improve the well-being of older adults, but conclusions are limited due to the lack of high-quality studies. More RCTs are recommended with larger sample sizes and rigorous study designs.

摘要

背景与目的

社交机器人可以通过增加老年人的感知情感支持和社交互动,促进老年人的健康。本综述旨在总结随机对照试验(RCT)中社交机器人对老年人结局(心理、生理、生活质量或药物)的有效性。

研究设计与方法

对符合研究纳入标准的 RCT 进行混合方法系统综述。截至 2017 年 9 月,对 8 个数据库进行了电子检索。提取参与者特征、干预措施和结局数据。采用均数差值和标准化均数差值及其 95%置信区间(CI)合成效应量。

结果

共从 2204 篇文章中确定了 13 篇来自 11 项 RCT 的文章,其中 9 项研究纳入荟萃分析。在分配隐藏和盲法方面,偏倚风险相对较高。社交机器人似乎对老年人的激越、焦虑和生活质量有积极影响,但荟萃分析未发现统计学意义。然而,叙述性综述的结果表明,社交机器人互动可以改善老年人的参与度、互动和应激指标,减少孤独感和药物使用。

讨论与意义

社交机器人似乎有潜力改善老年人的健康状况,但由于高质量研究的缺乏,结论有限。建议进行更多具有更大样本量和严格研究设计的 RCT。

相似文献

1
The Effectiveness of Social Robots for Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies.社交机器人对老年人的有效性:随机对照研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gerontologist. 2019 Jan 9;59(1):e37-e51. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny046.
2
Social Robots for Depression in Older Adults: A Systematic Review.社交机器人在老年人抑郁症中的应用:系统评价。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2018 Nov;50(6):612-622. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12423. Epub 2018 Sep 9.
3
The Effect of Social Robots on Depression and Loneliness for Older Residents in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.社交机器人对长期护理设施中老年人抑郁和孤独感的影响:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024 Jun;25(6):104979. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.02.017. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
4
Exploring the impact of socially assistive robots on health and wellbeing across the lifespan: An umbrella review and meta-analysis.探讨社交辅助机器人在整个生命周期中对健康和幸福的影响:伞式综述和荟萃分析。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2024 May;153:104730. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104730. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
5
6
Psychosocial Health Interventions by Social Robots: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.社交机器人的心理社会健康干预:随机对照试验的系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2019 May 10;21(5):e13203. doi: 10.2196/13203.
7
8
Cochrane review: social skills groups for people aged 6 to 21 with autism spectrum disorders (ASD).Cochrane综述:针对6至21岁自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)患者的社交技能小组。
Evid Based Child Health. 2013 Mar 7;8(2):266-315. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1903.
9
The effectiveness of patient navigation programs for adult cancer patients undergoing treatment: a systematic review.成人癌症患者治疗期间患者导航项目的有效性:一项系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):295-321. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2324.
10
The effectiveness of interventions to meet family needs of critically ill patients in an adult intensive care unit: a systematic review update.成人重症监护病房中满足重症患者家庭需求的干预措施的有效性:系统评价更新
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Mar;14(3):181-234. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2477.

引用本文的文献

1
Designing for flourishing: a conceptual model for enhancing older adults' well-being with social robots.为蓬勃发展而设计:一个利用社交机器人提升老年人幸福感的概念模型。
Front Robot AI. 2025 Aug 20;12:1607373. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2025.1607373. eCollection 2025.
2
Effectiveness and usability of care robots in supporting older adults living with frailty: A systematic review.护理机器人对体弱老年人的支持效果及可用性:一项系统综述。
Digit Health. 2025 Aug 21;11:20552076251370058. doi: 10.1177/20552076251370058. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
Socially assistive robots and meaningful work: the case of aged care.
社交辅助机器人与有意义的工作:老年护理案例
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2025;12(1):1070. doi: 10.1057/s41599-025-05498-0. Epub 2025 Jul 11.
4
Understanding Older Adults' (Dis)Engagement with Design Materials.理解老年人与设计材料的(不)参与情况。
Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst. 2025;2025. doi: 10.1145/3706598.3713846.
5
Implementation of New Technologies in an Aged Care Social Day Program: Mixed Methods Evaluation.老年护理社会日项目中新技术的实施:混合方法评估
JMIR Aging. 2025 May 12;8:e60297. doi: 10.2196/60297.
6
Artificial intelligence-powered social robots for promoting physical activity in older adults: A systematic review.用于促进老年人身体活动的人工智能社交机器人:一项系统综述。
J Sport Health Sci. 2025 Apr 24:101045. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2025.101045.
7
Social robot PIO intervention for improving cognitive function and depression in older adults with mild to moderate dementia in day care centers: A randomized controlled trial.社交机器人PIO干预对日间护理中心轻至中度痴呆老年人认知功能和抑郁的改善作用:一项随机对照试验
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 22;20(4):e0321745. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321745. eCollection 2025.
8
A systematic review on the efficacy of artificial intelligence in geriatric healthcare: a critical analysis of current literature.关于人工智能在老年保健中功效的系统评价:对当前文献的批判性分析。
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Apr 11;25(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05878-w.
9
Effect of AI intervention programs for older adults on the quality of life: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.人工智能干预项目对老年人生活质量的影响:随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
Digit Health. 2025 Mar 21;11:20552076251324014. doi: 10.1177/20552076251324014. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
10
The Potential of a Robot Presence in Close Relationship to Influence Human Responses to Experimental Pain.机器人在亲密关系中的存在对人类对实验性疼痛反应的影响潜力。
Life (Basel). 2025 Feb 4;15(2):229. doi: 10.3390/life15020229.