Cox S M, Ekstrom L J, Gillis G B
Kinesiology Department, The Pennsylvania State University, 29 Recreation Hall, University Park, PA 16801, USA.
Biology Department, Wheaton College, 26 E. Main St., Norton, MA 02038, USA.
Integr Comp Biol. 2018 Nov 1;58(5):894-905. doi: 10.1093/icb/icy059.
Coordinated landing from a jump requires preparation, which must include appropriate positioning and configuration of the landing limbs and body to be successful. While well studied in mammals, our lab has been using the cane toad (Rhinella marinus) as a model for understanding the biomechanics of controlled landing in anurans, animals that use jumping or bounding as their dominant mode of locomotion. In this article, we report new results from experiments designed to explore how different modes of sensory feedback contribute to previously identified features of coordinated landing in toads. More specifically, animals in which vision, hindlimb proprioception, or vestibular feedback were removed, underwent a series of hopping trials while high-speed video was used to record and characterize limb movements and electromyographic (EMG) activity was recorded from a major elbow extensor (anconeus). Results demonstrate that altering any sensory system impacts landing behavior, though loss of vision had the least effect. Blind animals showed significant differences in anconeus EMG timing relative to controls, but forelimb and hindlimb movements as well as the ability to successfully decelerate the body using the forelimbs were not affected. Compromising hindlimb proprioception led to distinctly different forelimb kinematics. Though EMG patterns were disrupted, animals in this condition were also able to decelerate after impact, though with less control, regularly allowing their trunks to make ground contact during landing. Animals with compromised vestibular systems showed the greatest deficits, both in takeoff and landing behavior, which were highly variable and rarely coordinated. Nevertheless, animals in this condition demonstrated EMG patterns and forelimb kinematics similar to those in control animals. The fact that no ablation entirely eliminates all aspects of landing preparation suggests that its underpinnings are complex and that there is no single sensory trigger for its initiation.
从跳跃状态进行协调着陆需要做好准备,这必须包括着陆肢体和身体的适当定位与配置才能成功。虽然在哺乳动物中对此已有充分研究,但我们实验室一直以蔗蟾蜍(海蟾蜍,Rhinella marinus)作为模型,来理解无尾两栖动物(以跳跃或蹦跳作为主要运动方式的动物)控制着陆的生物力学原理。在本文中,我们报告了一些新的实验结果,这些实验旨在探究不同模式的感觉反馈如何促成蔗蟾蜍先前已确定的协调着陆特征。更具体地说,去除视觉、后肢本体感觉或前庭反馈的动物进行了一系列跳跃试验,同时使用高速视频记录并描述肢体运动,并且从主要的肘部伸肌(肘肌)记录肌电图(EMG)活动。结果表明,改变任何一种感觉系统都会影响着陆行为,不过视觉丧失的影响最小。失明动物的肘肌肌电图时间相对于对照组有显著差异,但前肢和后肢运动以及使用前肢成功使身体减速的能力并未受到影响。损害后肢本体感觉会导致明显不同的前肢运动学特征。虽然肌电图模式受到干扰,但处于这种状态的动物在碰撞后也能够减速,不过控制能力较差,在着陆过程中经常让其躯干接触地面。前庭系统受损的动物在起飞和着陆行为方面表现出最大的缺陷,这些行为高度可变且很少协调。然而,处于这种状态的动物表现出的肌电图模式和前肢运动学特征与对照动物相似。没有任何一种切除完全消除着陆准备的所有方面,这一事实表明其基础是复杂的,并且启动着陆准备没有单一的感觉触发因素。