Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.
Department of Earth System Science, Center on Food Security and the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Oct;24(10):4718-4730. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14356. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
A better understanding of recent crop yield trends is necessary for improving the yield and maintaining food security. Several possible mechanisms have been investigated recently in order to explain the steady growth in maize yield over the US Corn-Belt, but a substantial fraction of the increasing trend remains elusive. In this study, trends in grain filling period (GFP) were identified and their relations with maize yield increase were further analyzed. Using satellite data from 2000 to 2015, an average lengthening of GFP of 0.37 days per year was found over the region, which probably results from variety renewal. Statistical analysis suggests that longer GFP accounted for roughly one-quarter (23%) of the yield increase trend by promoting kernel dry matter accumulation, yet had less yield benefit in hotter counties. Both official survey data and crop model simulations estimated a similar contribution of GFP trend to yield. If growing degree days that determines the GFP continues to prolong at the current rate for the next 50 years, yield reduction will be lessened with 25% and 18% longer GFP under Representative Concentration Pathway 2.6 (RCP 2.6) and RCP 6.0, respectively. However, this level of progress is insufficient to offset yield losses in future climates, because drought and heat stress during the GFP will become more prevalent and severe. This study highlights the need to devise multiple effective adaptation strategies to withstand the upcoming challenges in food security.
为了提高产量和保障粮食安全,我们有必要更好地了解近期作物产量的变化趋势。为了解释美国玉米带玉米产量的持续增长,最近已经研究了几种可能的机制,但仍有很大一部分增长趋势难以解释。在本研究中,我们确定了灌浆期(grain filling period,GFP)的变化趋势,并进一步分析了它们与玉米产量增加的关系。利用 2000 年至 2015 年的卫星数据,我们发现该地区的 GFP 平均每年延长 0.37 天,这可能是由于品种更新所致。统计分析表明,较长的 GFP 通过促进籽粒干物质积累,大约解释了产量增长趋势的四分之一(23%),但在较热的县份,其产量效益较低。官方调查数据和作物模型模拟都估计 GFP 变化趋势对产量的贡献相似。如果决定 GFP 的生长度日继续以目前的速度延长 50 年,在代表性浓度路径 2.6(RCP 2.6)和 RCP 6.0 下,分别将 GFP 延长 25%和 18%,产量减少的幅度将分别减少 25%和 18%。然而,这种进展水平不足以抵消未来气候下的产量损失,因为 GFP 期间的干旱和热胁迫将变得更加普遍和严重。本研究强调,有必要制定多种有效的适应策略,以应对即将到来的粮食安全挑战。