• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直言不讳与一走了之:弱势患者是否不太可能不同意或更换医生?

Speaking Up and Walking Out: Are Vulnerable Patients Less Likely to Disagree With or Change Doctors?

机构信息

RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA.

RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.

出版信息

Med Care. 2018 Sep;56(9):749-754. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000936.

DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000000936
PMID:29901494
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Disparities in clinical process-of-care and patient experiences are well documented for Medicare beneficiaries with ≥1 social risk factors. If such patients are less willing to express disagreement with their doctors or change doctors when dissatisfied, these behaviors may play a role in observed disparities.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between social risk factors and self-reported likelihood of disagreeing with or changing doctors if dissatisfied among the Medicare fee-for-service population.

SUBJECTS

Fee-for-service beneficiaries (N=96,317) who responded to the 2014 Medicare Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey. Subgroups were defined based on age, education, income, and race/ethnicity.

METHODS

Respondents reported how likely they would be to express disagreement with their doctors and change doctors if dissatisfied (1=very unlikely to 4=very likely; rescaled to 0-100 points). We fit mixed-effect linear regression models predicting these outcomes from social risk factors, controlling for health status and geographic location.

RESULTS

Beneficiaries who were older, less educated, and had lower incomes were least inclined to express disagreement or change doctors (P<0.001). Compared with non-Hispanic whites, Asian/Pacific Islander (-9.5) and Hispanic (-3.6) beneficiaries said they would be less likely, and black (+2.8) beneficiaries more likely, to express disagreement. Asian/Pacific Islander (-8.7), Hispanic (-5.9), and American Indian/Alaska Native (-3.8) beneficiaries were less inclined than non-Hispanic whites to change doctors (P<0.01).

DISCUSSION

Reduction in health care disparities may be achieved if doctors and advocates encourage vulnerable patients to express their concerns and perspectives and if communities and caregivers provide support for changing providers when care is poor.

摘要

背景

对于至少有 1 个社会风险因素的 Medicare 受益人,临床医疗过程和患者体验方面的差异有充分的记录。如果这些患者不太愿意表达对医生的不同意见,或者在不满意时更换医生,那么这些行为可能在观察到的差异中发挥作用。

目的

调查 Medicare 按服务收费人群中,社会风险因素与报告的如果不满意则更不愿意表达不同意见或更换医生的可能性之间的关联。

受试者

对 2014 年 Medicare 医疗保健提供者和系统消费者评估调查做出回应的按服务收费受益人的样本(N=96317)。根据年龄、教育程度、收入和种族/族裔定义亚组。

方法

受访者报告了他们在不满意时表示不同意医生意见和更换医生的可能性(1=极不可能,4=极有可能;重新调整为 0-100 分)。我们使用混合效应线性回归模型,根据社会风险因素预测这些结果,同时控制健康状况和地理位置。

结果

年龄较大、教育程度较低和收入较低的受益人表示不同意或更换医生的可能性最小(P<0.001)。与非西班牙裔白人相比,亚裔/太平洋岛民(-9.5)和西班牙裔(-3.6)受益人的表示他们更不可能表示不同意,而黑人(+2.8)受益人的表示他们更可能表示不同意。与非西班牙裔白人相比,亚裔/太平洋岛民(-8.7)、西班牙裔(-5.9)和美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民(-3.8)的受益人的更不愿意更换医生(P<0.01)。

讨论

如果医生和倡导者鼓励弱势患者表达他们的关切和观点,如果社区和护理人员在护理质量差时为更换提供者提供支持,那么可能会减少医疗保健差异。

相似文献

1
Speaking Up and Walking Out: Are Vulnerable Patients Less Likely to Disagree With or Change Doctors?直言不讳与一走了之:弱势患者是否不太可能不同意或更换医生?
Med Care. 2018 Sep;56(9):749-754. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000936.
2
Do Experiences with Medicare Managed Care Vary According to the Proportion of Same-Race/Ethnicity/Language Individuals Enrolled in One's Contract?医疗保险管理式医疗的体验是否会因合同中同种族/民族/语言个体的参保比例而有所不同?
Health Serv Res. 2015 Oct;50(5):1649-87. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12292. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
3
Racial/Ethnic differences in Medicare experiences and immunization: the role of disease burden.医疗保险中的种族/民族差异及免疫接种:疾病负担的作用。
Med Care. 2013 Sep;51(9):823-31. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31829c8d77.
4
Disparities in Care Experienced by American Indian and Alaska Native Medicare Beneficiaries.美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民 Medicare 受益人的护理差异。
Med Care. 2020 Nov;58(11):981-987. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001392.
5
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Medicare Beneficiaries' Care Coordination Experiences.医疗保险受益人的护理协调体验中的种族/族裔差异。
Med Care. 2016 Aug;54(8):765-71. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000556.
6
Comparing the Health Care Experiences of Medicare Beneficiaries with and without Depressive Symptoms in Medicare Managed Care versus Fee-for-Service.比较医疗保险管理式医疗与按服务收费模式下有和没有抑郁症状的医疗保险受益人的医疗保健经历。
Health Serv Res. 2016 Jun;51(3):1002-20. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12359. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
7
Area Vulnerability and Disparities in Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.转移性肾细胞癌患者治疗中的地区脆弱性和差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 1;7(4):e248747. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.8747.
8
How do the experiences of Medicare beneficiary subgroups differ between managed care and original Medicare?医疗保险受益人群亚组在管理式医疗和原始医疗保险之间的体验有何不同?
Health Serv Res. 2011 Aug;46(4):1039-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01245.x. Epub 2011 Feb 9.
9
Ethnoracial Disparities in Medicare Annual Wellness Visit Utilization: Evidence From a Nationally Representative Database.医疗保险年度体检利用中的民族种族差异:来自全国代表性数据库的证据。
Med Care. 2018 Sep;56(9):761-766. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000962.
10
Persistent Disparities in Medicare's Annual Wellness Visit Utilization.医疗保险年度体检利用的持续差异。
Med Care. 2019 Dec;57(12):984-989. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001229.

引用本文的文献

1
Partnering with Patients and Families to Improve Diagnostic Safety through the OurDX Tool: Effects of Race, Ethnicity, and Language Preference.通过 OurDX 工具与患者及其家属合作,提高诊断安全性:种族、民族和语言偏好的影响。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Oct;14(5):903-912. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1776055. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
2
Health professional's implicit bias of adult patients with low socioeconomic status (SES) and its effects on clinical decision-making: a scoping review protocol.卫生专业人员对社会经济地位较低的成年患者的隐性偏见及其对临床决策的影响:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 12;12(12):e059837. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059837.
3
Geriatric assessment and management with question prompt list using a web-based application for elderly patients with cancer (MAPLE) to communicate ageing-related concerns: J-SUPPORT 2101 study protocol for a multicentre, parallel group, randomised controlled trial.
基于网络的老年癌症患者问题提示清单评估和管理工具(MAPLE)用于沟通与老龄化相关问题的研究方案:多中心、平行组、随机对照试验 J-SUPPORT 2101 研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 26;12(9):e063445. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063445.