Chinachoti Thitima, Rattana-arpa Sirirat, Puntigo Mathawin
J Med Assoc Thai. 2016 Jul;99(7):811-5.
Clinicians are divided regarding laryngeal mask airway (LMA) size selection for pediatric patients, primarily whether age or body weight is an appropriate predictor.
Determine if body weight and/or age are reliable predictors in LMA size selection in Thai children.
Retrospective review of patient medical records was conducted between October 1, 2012 and December 31, 2013. Seven hundred forty one patients, aged 0 to 8 years, were evaluated for the present study. Age and weight correlation for LMA size selection was determined. Appropriate LMA size was identified by successful LMA insertion after induction of anesthesia.
Our findings indicate that size 1 LMA for patients weighing less than 7 kilograms, size 1.5 LMA for patients weighing 7 to 11 kilograms, size 2 LMA for patients weighing 11 to 17 kilograms, and size 2.5 LMA for patients weighing 15 to 28 kilograms is appropriate. There was poor correlation between children’s age and LMA size.
LMA size selection should be based on patient’s weight. Our findings revealed applicable and specific weight range for LMA selection in Thai pediatric patients
临床医生在小儿患者喉罩气道(LMA)尺寸选择上存在分歧,主要在于年龄或体重是否是合适的预测指标。
确定体重和/或年龄在泰国儿童LMA尺寸选择中是否为可靠的预测指标。
对2012年10月1日至2013年12月31日期间的患者病历进行回顾性研究。本研究评估了741例年龄在0至8岁之间的患者。确定了LMA尺寸选择的年龄与体重相关性。通过麻醉诱导后成功插入LMA确定合适的LMA尺寸。
我们的研究结果表明,体重小于7千克的患者使用1号LMA,体重7至11千克的患者使用1.5号LMA,体重11至17千克的患者使用2号LMA,体重15至28千克的患者使用2.5号LMA是合适的。儿童年龄与LMA尺寸之间的相关性较差。
LMA尺寸选择应基于患者体重。我们的研究结果揭示了泰国小儿患者LMA选择适用的具体体重范围。