• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[宫颈成熟与引产:单球囊导管与双球囊导管及地诺前列酮栓的比较评估]

[Cervical ripening and labor induction: Evaluation of single balloon catheter compared to double balloon catheter and dinoprostone insert].

作者信息

Pez V, Deruelle P, Kyheng M, Boyon C, Clouqueur E, Garabedian C

机构信息

Clinique d'obstétrique, CHU de Lille, 59000 Lille, France.

Clinique d'obstétrique, CHU de Lille, 59000 Lille, France; EA 4489 Environnement périnatal et croissance, Université de Lille, 59000 Lille, France.

出版信息

Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018 Jul-Aug;46(7-8):570-574. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2018.05.009. Epub 2018 Jun 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.gofs.2018.05.009
PMID:29903553
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of single balloon catheter with double balloon catheter and dinoprostone insert for cervical ripening and labor induction on unfavourable cervix.

METHODS

this is a comparative, retrospective, one-center trial. Were included singleton pregnancy in cephalic presentation. Were excluded cicatricial uterus. The outcomes were vaginal delivery rate, caesarean section rate, modification in Bishop score, time from induction to delivery, second time prostaglandin E2 resort, oxytocin administration resort, maternal or neonatal adverse events.

RESULTS

Were included 108 patients: 45 in single balloon catheter group, 32 in double balloon catheter group, 31 in dinoprostone insert group. Vaginal delivery rate was similar in single balloon catheter group (78 %) compared with others groups (75 % in double balloon catheter and 71 % in dinoprostone insert group respectively). Oxytocin administration resort was superior in single balloon catheter group. There was no significant difference on others outcomes. Labor induction costs were 9euros in single balloon catheter group, versus 55 and 81 euros in double balloon catheter group and dinoprostone insert group respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Single balloon catheter seems just as effective as double balloon catheter and dinoprostone insert with its major asset the low cost for labor induction.

摘要

目的

比较单球囊导管、双球囊导管和地诺前列酮栓剂用于宫颈成熟度差的促宫颈成熟及引产的有效性。

方法

这是一项单中心的回顾性对照试验。纳入单胎头先露妊娠。排除瘢痕子宫。观察指标包括阴道分娩率、剖宫产率、Bishop评分的变化、引产至分娩的时间、再次使用前列腺素E2的情况、催产素的使用情况、母婴不良事件。

结果

共纳入108例患者:单球囊导管组45例,双球囊导管组32例,地诺前列酮栓剂组31例。单球囊导管组的阴道分娩率(78%)与其他组相似(双球囊导管组为75%,地诺前列酮栓剂组为71%)。单球囊导管组催产素的使用情况更佳。其他观察指标无显著差异。单球囊导管组引产费用为9欧元,双球囊导管组和地诺前列酮栓剂组分别为55欧元和81欧元。

结论

单球囊导管似乎与双球囊导管和地诺前列酮栓剂一样有效,其主要优势在于引产成本低。

相似文献

1
[Cervical ripening and labor induction: Evaluation of single balloon catheter compared to double balloon catheter and dinoprostone insert].[宫颈成熟与引产:单球囊导管与双球囊导管及地诺前列酮栓的比较评估]
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018 Jul-Aug;46(7-8):570-574. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2018.05.009. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
2
[Double-balloon catheter compared to vaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening in obese women at term].[足月肥胖女性宫颈成熟:双球囊导管与阴道用米索前列醇的比较]
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2017 Oct;45(10):521-527. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2017.06.012. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
3
Double-balloon catheter vs. dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix.双球囊导管与地诺前列酮阴道栓剂用于宫颈条件不佳产妇引产的比较。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Jun;291(6):1221-7. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3547-3. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
4
Cervical ripening in prolonged pregnancies by silicone double balloon catheter versus vaginal dinoprostone slow release system: The MAGPOP randomised controlled trial.硅胶双球囊导管与阴道地诺前列酮缓慢释放系统在延长妊娠中的宫颈成熟作用:MAGPOP 随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2021 Feb 11;18(2):e1003448. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003448. eCollection 2021 Feb.
5
Which is the safer method of labor induction for oligohydramnios women? Transcervical double balloon catheter or dinoprostone vaginal insert.对于羊水过少的女性,哪种引产方法更安全?经宫颈双球囊导管引产还是地诺前列酮阴道栓剂引产?
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 Nov;27(17):1805-8. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.880880. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
6
Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter used alone or combined with a single dose of dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: a randomised study.单独使用宫颈内 Foley 导管或联合单剂量地诺前列酮凝胶用于宫颈成熟的比较:一项随机研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 May;39(4):461-467. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2018.1534090. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
7
Term prelabor rupture of membranes: Foley catheter versus dinoprostone as ripening agent.胎膜早破: Foley 导管与地诺前列酮作为促宫颈成熟剂。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020 Oct;49(8):101834. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101834. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
8
Double-balloon catheter versus dinoprostone insert for labour induction: a meta-analysis.双球囊导管与地诺前列酮栓用于引产的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019 Jan;299(1):7-12. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4929-8. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
9
Double-balloon catheter and sequential vaginal prostaglandin E2 versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 alone for induction of labor after previous cesarean section.双球囊导管联合序贯阴道前列腺素E2与单纯阴道前列腺素E2用于既往剖宫产术后引产的比较
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Apr;293(4):757-65. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3907-7. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
10
[Clinical analysis of double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening in 66 cases].双球囊导管用于宫颈成熟的66例临床分析
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Oct;49(10):741-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert and Dinoprostone Tablet for the Induction of Labor in Primipara: A Retrospective Cohort Study.地诺前列酮阴道栓剂与地诺前列酮片用于初产妇引产的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 19;11(12):3519. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123519.