Suppr超能文献

试验方案:认知功能疗法对比联合手法治疗和运动控制训练治疗非特异性慢性下腰痛患者的随机对照试验方案

Trial Protocol: Cognitive functional therapy compared with combined manual therapy and motor control exercise for people with non-specific chronic low back pain: protocol for a randomised, controlled trial.

机构信息

Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Centro Universitário Augusto Motta (UNISUAM).

Instituto Federal do Rio de Janeiro (IFRJ).

出版信息

J Physiother. 2018 Jul;64(3):192. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2018.02.018. Epub 2018 Jun 11.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Chronic low back pain is a public health problem, and there is strong evidence that it is associated with a complex interaction of biopsychosocial factors. Cognitive functional therapy is an intervention that deals with potentially modifiable multidimensional aspects of pain (eg, provocative cognitive, movement and lifestyle behaviours). There is evidence (from a single randomised, controlled trial) that cognitive functional therapy is better than combined manual therapy and motor control exercise. However, this study had significant methodological shortcomings including the failure to carry out an intention-to-treat analysis and a considerable loss of follow-up of participants. It is important to replicate this study in another domain through a randomised clinical trial with similar objectives but correcting these methodological shortcomings.

AIM

To investigate the efficacy of cognitive functional therapy compared to combined manual therapy and exercise on pain and disability at 3 months in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain.

DESIGN

Two-group, randomised, multicentre controlled trial with blinded assessors.

PARTICIPANTS AND SETTINGS

One hundred and forty-eight participants with chronic low back pain that has persisted for >3months and no specific spinal pathology will be recruited from the school clinic of the Centro Universitário Augusto Motta and a private clinic in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

INTERVENTION A

Four to 10 sessions of cognitive functional therapy. The physiotherapists who will treat the participants in the cognitive functional therapy group have previously attended 2 workshops with two different tutors of the method. Such physiotherapists have completed 106 hours of training, including workshops and patient examinations, as well as conducting a pilot study under the supervision of another physiotherapist with>3 years of clinical experience in cognitive functional therapy.

INTERVENTION B

Four to 10 sessions of combined manual therapy and motor control exercises. Participants in the combined manual therapy and exercise group will be treated by two physiotherapists with an average of >10years of clinical experience in manual therapy and motor control exercises, including isolated contractions of the deep abdominal muscles.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome measures will be pain intensity and disability 3 months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes will be pain and disability assessed 6 and 12 months after randomisation, and both global perceived effect and patient satisfaction at 3, 6 and 12 months after randomisation. The potential outcome mediators will be assessed at 3 and 6 months after randomisation, with brief screening questions for anxiety, social isolation, catastrophisation, depression, fear of movement, stress and sleep. Non-specific predictors and moderators will include age, gender, duration of chronic low back pain, chronicity risk (Örebro and Start Back score), number of pain areas, stressful life event, MRI scan imaging, and family history.

ANALYSIS

Intention-to-treat analysis will be performed. Linear mixed models will be used to compare the mean differences in pain intensity, disability and global perceived effect between the intervention arms. The analysis of the effect of potential mediators of the treatment will be performed using the causal mediation methods described by Imai and colleagues. The baseline variables will be evaluated as predictors and moderators of treatment, including terms and interaction models. A level of statistical significance of 5% will be used in the analysis. All the analyses will be performed using RStudio.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study will investigate whether the results of the first cognitive functional therapy randomised clinical trial are reproducible. The present study will have a sample size capable of detecting clinically relevant effects of the treatment with a low risk of bias. In pragmatic terms, this clinical trial is designed to reproduce the intervention as it would be performed in clinical practice by a trained physiotherapist who works with cognitive functional therapy, which increases the relevance of this study. The combined manual therapy and exercise group comprises an intervention strategy widely used by physiotherapists to treat low back pain. As evidence of efficacy is still limited, the results of a randomised, controlled clinical trial of high methodological quality will help physiotherapists in clinical decision-making.

摘要

简介

慢性下腰痛是一个公共卫生问题,有强有力的证据表明它与生物心理社会因素的复杂相互作用有关。认知功能疗法是一种干预措施,涉及疼痛的潜在可调节多维方面(例如,挑衅性认知、运动和生活方式行为)。有证据(来自一项随机对照试验)表明,认知功能疗法优于联合手法治疗和运动控制锻炼。然而,这项研究存在显著的方法学缺陷,包括未能进行意向治疗分析和参与者的随访损失相当大。通过一项具有类似目标但纠正这些方法学缺陷的随机临床试验,在另一个领域复制这项研究是很重要的。

目的

调查认知功能疗法与联合手法治疗和运动对慢性非特异性下腰痛患者 3 个月时疼痛和残疾的疗效。

设计

双盲评估的 2 组随机、多中心对照试验。

参与者和设置

将从巴西里约热内卢市奥古斯托莫塔大学的学校诊所和一家私人诊所招募 148 名慢性腰痛持续时间超过 3 个月且无特定脊柱病理的患者。

干预 A:4 至 10 次认知功能疗法。将在认知功能治疗组中治疗参与者的物理治疗师之前参加过两次不同方法导师的 2 次讲习班。这些物理治疗师已经完成了 106 小时的培训,包括讲习班和患者检查,以及在另一位具有>3 年认知功能治疗临床经验的物理治疗师的监督下进行试点研究。

干预 B:4 至 10 次联合手法治疗和运动控制锻炼。联合手法治疗和运动控制锻炼组的参与者将由两位物理治疗师治疗,他们平均具有>10 年的手法治疗和运动控制锻炼临床经验,包括深部腹肌的孤立收缩。

测量

主要结局指标将是随机分组后 3 个月的疼痛强度和残疾程度。次要结局指标将是随机分组后 6 个月和 12 个月的疼痛和残疾程度,以及随机分组后 3 个月、6 个月和 12 个月的总体感知效果和患者满意度。潜在的结果调解者将在随机分组后 3 个月和 6 个月进行评估,使用焦虑、社会孤立、灾难化、抑郁、运动恐惧、压力和睡眠的简短筛查问题。非特异性预测因子和调节剂将包括年龄、性别、慢性腰痛持续时间、慢性风险(奥雷布洛和开始背评分)、疼痛区域数量、应激性生活事件、MRI 扫描成像和家族史。

分析

将进行意向治疗分析。线性混合模型将用于比较干预组之间疼痛强度、残疾和总体感知效果的平均差异。治疗潜在调解者的效果分析将使用今井和同事描述的因果中介方法进行。基线变量将作为治疗的预测因子和调节剂进行评估,包括术语和交互模型。分析中将使用 5%的统计学显著性水平。所有分析都将使用 RStudio 进行。

意义

本研究将调查首次认知功能治疗随机临床试验的结果是否具有可重复性。本研究将有一个足够的样本量,可以检测到治疗的具有临床意义的效果,且具有低偏倚风险。从实用的角度来看,这项临床试验旨在复制在临床实践中由接受过认知功能治疗培训的物理治疗师进行的干预,这增加了这项研究的相关性。联合手法治疗和运动控制锻炼组包括物理治疗师广泛用于治疗腰痛的一种干预策略。由于疗效证据仍然有限,一项具有较高方法学质量的随机对照临床试验的结果将有助于物理治疗师做出临床决策。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验