关于幻想驱动与接触驱动的网络引发性犯罪的数据：研究选择、评估及特征
Data on fantasy vs contact driven internet-initiated sexual offences: Study selection, appraisal and characteristics.
作者信息
Broome L J, Izura C, Lorenzo-Dus N
机构信息
Swansea University, United Kingdom.
出版信息
Data Brief. 2018 Apr 25;18:1869-1876. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.04.076. eCollection 2018 Jun.
Abstract
Data presented within this article supports the findings of the manuscript "A systematic review of fantasy driven vs contact driven internet-initiated sexual offences: Discrete or overlapping typologies?" (Broome et al., in press) [1]. Inclusion and Exclusion criteria of study selection, PICO Formulation of Study Appraisal, as well as the Study Characteristics and Methodology of included studies are presented.
摘要
本文中呈现的数据支持了论文《对幻想驱动型与接触驱动型网络引发性犯罪的系统评价：离散型还是重叠型类型学？》（布鲁姆等人，即将发表）[1]的研究结果。文中介绍了研究选择的纳入和排除标准、研究评估的PICO制定，以及纳入研究的研究特征和方法。
相似文献
1
Data on fantasy vs contact driven internet-initiated sexual offences: Study selection, appraisal and characteristics.关于幻想驱动与接触驱动的网络引发性犯罪的数据：研究选择、评估及特征
Data Brief. 2018 Apr 25;18:1869-1876. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.04.076. eCollection 2018 Jun.
2
A systematic review of fantasy driven vs. contact driven internet-initiated sexual offences: Discrete or overlapping typologies?一项关于基于幻想和基于接触的网络性犯罪的系统综述：离散型还是重叠型分类？
Child Abuse Negl. 2018 May;79:434-444. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.02.021. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
3
Chat Analysis Triage Tool: Differentiating contact-driven vs. fantasy-driven child sex offenders.聊天分析分诊工具：区分接触驱动型与幻想驱动型儿童性犯罪者。
Forensic Sci Int. 2019 Apr;297:e8-e10. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.02.028. Epub 2019 Feb 23.
4
Fantasy-Driven Versus Contact-Driven Users of Child Sexual Exploitation Material: Offender Classification and Implications for Their Risk Assessment.儿童性剥削材料的幻想驱动型与接触驱动型使用者：犯罪者分类及其对风险评估的影响
Sex Abuse. 2018 Apr;30(3):230-253. doi: 10.1177/1079063216641109. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
5
The content of sexual fantasies for sexual offenders.性犯罪者性幻想的内容。
Sex Abuse. 2004 Oct;16(4):315-31. doi: 10.1177/107906320401600405.
6
Psychological profiles of internet sexual offenders: comparisons with contact sexual offenders.网络性犯罪者的心理剖析：与接触性性犯罪者的比较。
Sex Abuse. 2009 Mar;21(1):76-92. doi: 10.1177/1079063208326929.
7
Online child pornography offenders are different: a meta-analysis of the characteristics of online and offline sex offenders against children.在线儿童色情制品犯罪者有所不同：对在线和离线针对儿童的性犯罪者特征的荟萃分析。
Arch Sex Behav. 2015 Jan;44(1):45-66. doi: 10.1007/s10508-014-0270-x. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
8
An exploratory study of Internet-initiated sexual offenses and the chat room sex offender: has the Internet enabled a new typology of sex offender?互联网引发的性犯罪和聊天室性犯罪者的探索性研究：互联网是否产生了一种新的性犯罪者类型？
Sex Abuse. 2011 Mar;23(1):72-91. doi: 10.1177/1079063210384275. Epub 2010 Oct 14.
9
Guilty or not? A path model of women's sexual force fantasies.有罪与否？女性性暴力幻想的路径模型。
J Sex Res. 2006 Nov;43(4):368-77. doi: 10.1080/00224490609552336.
10
On the Content of "Real-World" Sexual Fantasy: Results From an Analysis of 250,000+ Anonymous Text-Based Erotic Fantasies.“真实世界”性幻想的内容：对 25 万+匿名基于文本的色情幻想的分析结果。
Arch Sex Behav. 2019 Apr;48(3):725-737. doi: 10.1007/s10508-018-1334-0. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
本文引用的文献
1
A systematic review of fantasy driven vs. contact driven internet-initiated sexual offences: Discrete or overlapping typologies?一项关于基于幻想和基于接触的网络性犯罪的系统综述：离散型还是重叠型分类？
Child Abuse Negl. 2018 May;79:434-444. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.02.021. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
2
Behavioural Differences Between Online Sexual Groomers Approaching Boys and Girls.接近男孩和女孩的网络性诱骗者的行为差异
J Child Sex Abus. 2016 Jul;25(5):577-96. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2016.1189473.
3
A Qualitative Analysis of Offenders' Modus Operandi in Sexually Exploitative Interactions With Children Online.对罪犯在网上与儿童进行性剥削互动时作案手法的定性分析。
Sex Abuse. 2017 Sep;29(6):563-591. doi: 10.1177/1079063215612442. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
4
A linguistic analysis of grooming strategies of online child sex offenders: Implications for our understanding of predatory sexual behavior in an increasingly computer-mediated world.对在线儿童性犯罪者的诱导策略进行语言分析：对我们理解在日益由计算机介导的世界中的掠夺性性行为的启示。
Child Abuse Negl. 2015 Jun;44:140-9. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.12.004. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
5
Are crimes by online predators different from crimes by sex offenders who know youth in-person?网络诱骗者的犯罪行为是否与那些认识青少年的性犯罪者的犯罪行为不同？
J Adolesc Health. 2013 Dec;53(6):736-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.06.010. Epub 2013 Jul 26.
6
Evidence Searching for Evidence-based Psychology Practice.为基于证据的心理学实践寻找证据
Prof Psychol Res Pr. 2010 Dec;41(8):550-557. doi: 10.1037/a0021352.
7
An exploratory study of Internet-initiated sexual offenses and the chat room sex offender: has the Internet enabled a new typology of sex offender?互联网引发的性犯罪和聊天室性犯罪者的探索性研究：互联网是否产生了一种新的性犯罪者类型？
Sex Abuse. 2011 Mar;23(1):72-91. doi: 10.1177/1079063210384275. Epub 2010 Oct 14.
8
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.系统评价与Meta分析优先报告条目：PRISMA声明
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
9
Interpreting the intentions of internet predators:an examination of online predatory behavior.解读网络捕食者的意图：对在线捕食行为的审视。
J Child Sex Abus. 2007;16(4):99-114. doi: 10.1300/J070v16n04_06.
10
Predatory online behavior: modus operandi of convicted sex offenders in identifying potential victims and contacting minors over the internet.网络掠夺行为：被定罪的性犯罪者在识别潜在受害者并通过互联网联系未成年人方面的作案手法。
J Child Sex Abus. 2007;16(2):23-32. doi: 10.1300/J070v16n02_02.
Zotero 插件