Suppr超能文献

自我转诊与医生转诊:哪种新患者就诊方式会产生实际的手术病例?

Self-referrals versus physician referrals: What new patient visit yields an actual surgical case?

作者信息

Herring Eric Z, Peck Matthew R, Vonck Caroline E, Smith Gabriel A, Mroz Thomas E, Steinmetz Michael P

机构信息

1Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine.

2Center for Spine Health, Cleveland Clinic; and.

出版信息

J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Sep;29(3):314-321. doi: 10.3171/2018.1.SPINE17793. Epub 2018 Jun 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Spine surgeons in the United States continue to be overwhelmed by an aging population, and patients are waiting weeks to months for appointments. With a finite number of clinic visits per surgeon, analysis of referral sources needs to be explored. In this study, the authors evaluated patient referrals and their yield for surgical volume at a tertiary care center. METHODS This is a retrospective study of new patient visits by the spine surgery group at the Cleveland Clinic Center for Spine Health from 2011 to 2016. Data on all new or consultation visits for 5 identified spinal surgeons at the Center for Spine Health were collected. Patients with an identifiable referral source and who were at least 18 years of age at initial visit were included in this study. Univariate analysis was used to identify demographic differences among referral groups, and then multivariate analysis was used to evaluate those referral groups as significant predictors of surgical yield. RESULTS After adjusting for demographic differences across all referrals, multivariate analysis identified physician referrals as more likely (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.04-2.10, p = 0.0293) to yield a surgical case than self-referrals. General practitioner referrals (OR 0.5616, 95% CI 0.3809-0.8278, p = 0.0036) were identified as less likely to yield surgical cases than referrals from interventionalists (OR 1.5296, p = 0.058) or neurologists (OR 1.7498, 95% CI 1.0057-3.0446, p = 0.0477). Additionally, 2 demographic factors, including distance from home and age, were identified as predictors of surgery. Local patients (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.13-1.29, p = 0.018) and those 65 years of age or older (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.72-0.87, p = 0.0023) were both more likely to need surgery after establishing care with a spine surgeon. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, referrals from general practitioners and self-referrals are important areas where focused triaging may be necessary. Further research into midlevel providers and nonsurgical spine provider's role in these referrals for spine pathology is needed. Patients from outside of the state or younger than 65 years could benefit from pre-visit screening as well to optimize a surgeon's clinic time use and streamline patient care.

摘要

目的 美国脊柱外科医生仍因人口老龄化而不堪重负,患者等待预约的时间长达数周甚至数月。由于每位外科医生的门诊次数有限,因此需要探讨转诊来源的分析。在本研究中,作者评估了三级医疗中心的患者转诊情况及其手术量产出。方法 这是一项对2011年至2016年克利夫兰诊所脊柱健康中心脊柱外科组新患者就诊情况的回顾性研究。收集了脊柱健康中心5位已确定的脊柱外科医生所有新患者就诊或会诊的数据。本研究纳入了有可识别转诊来源且初诊时年龄至少为18岁的患者。采用单因素分析确定转诊组之间的人口统计学差异,然后采用多因素分析评估这些转诊组作为手术量产出的重要预测因素。结果 在对所有转诊的人口统计学差异进行调整后,多因素分析确定医生转诊比自我转诊更有可能(OR 1.48,95%CI 1.04 - 2.10,p = 0.0293)产生手术病例。全科医生转诊(OR 0.5616,95%CI 0.3809 - 0.8278,p = 0.0036)被确定比介入科医生转诊(OR 1.5296,p = 0.058)或神经科医生转诊(OR 1.7498,95%CI 1.0057 - 3.0446,p = 0.0477)产生手术病例的可能性更小。此外,确定了两个人口统计学因素,包括离家距离和年龄,作为手术的预测因素。当地患者(OR 1.21,95%CI 1.13 - 1.29,p = 0.018)和65岁及以上的患者(OR 0.80,95%CI 0.72 - 0.87,p = 0.0023)在与脊柱外科医生建立诊疗关系后都更有可能需要手术。结论 总之,全科医生转诊和自我转诊是可能需要重点进行分诊的重要领域。需要进一步研究中级医疗人员和非手术脊柱医疗人员在这些脊柱疾病转诊中的作用。来自本州以外或年龄小于65岁的患者也可能从就诊前筛查中受益,以优化外科医生的门诊时间使用并简化患者护理流程。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验