• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用左心室辅助装置降低固定性肺动脉高压后心脏移植的长期预后。

Long-term heart transplant outcomes after lowering fixed pulmonary hypertension using left ventricular assist devices.

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Dec 1;54(6):1116-1121. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy214.

DOI:10.1093/ejcts/ezy214
PMID:29905775
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Fixed pulmonary hypertension (fPH) is a contraindication for heart transplantation (HTX). Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation as a bridge to candidacy can reverse fPH in patients with terminal heart failure by chronic left ventricular unloading. We report our institutional experience with terminal heart failure patients and fPH that were successfully bridged to candidacy and underwent subsequent HTX.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of 79 patients with terminal heart failure and fPH who were successfully bridged to candidacy for HTX with 6 different LVAD devices at our centre from October 1998 to September 2016 (Novacor n = 4, MicroMed DeBakey n = 29, DuraHeart n = 2, HeartMate II n = 14, HVAD n = 29 and MVAD n = 1). Median duration of LVAD support was 288 days (range 45-2279 days). Within the same timeframe, a control group of 48 patients underwent HTX after bridge-to-transplant LVAD therapy for reasons other than PH. Study end points were (i) development of fPH after LVAD implantation, (ii) post-transplant outcomes and (iii) incidence of severe adverse events.

RESULTS

Pulmonary vascular resistance, assessed by vasodynamic catheterization, was 4.3 ± 1.8 WU before LVAD implantation. After a median support period of 89 days (interquartile range 4-156 days), pulmonary vascular resistance decreased to 2.0 ± 0.9 WU (P ≤ 0.001), and patients were listed for HTX. Median duration of LVAD support in the study group was 288 days (45-2279 days). We observed 2 patients (2.5%) with acute right heart failure who required extracorporeal mechanical support after HTX in the study group. Long-term post-transplant survival between the study group (3 years: 83.5%, 5 years: 81.0%) and the control group (3 years: 87.5%, 5 years: 85.4%) was comparable (log-rank: P = 0.585).

CONCLUSIONS

LVAD implantation as a bridge to candidacy reverses fPH in patients with terminal heart failure. Post-HTX survival is excellent and comparable to results obtained in patients without fPH at the time of HTX listing.

摘要

目的

固定性肺动脉高压(fPH)是心脏移植(HTX)的禁忌证。通过慢性左心室卸载,左心室辅助装置(LVAD)作为候选者的桥接可以逆转终末期心力衰竭患者的 fPH。我们报告了我们机构在终末期心力衰竭和 fPH 患者中的经验,这些患者通过 6 种不同的 LVAD 设备成功桥接候选者,并随后接受 HTX。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 1998 年 10 月至 2016 年 9 月期间,我们中心使用 6 种不同的 LVAD 设备成功桥接候选者进行 HTX 的 79 例终末期心力衰竭和 fPH 患者的数据(Novacor n=4,MicroMed DeBakey n=29,DuraHeart n=2,HeartMate II n=14,HVAD n=29,MVAD n=1)。LVAD 支持的中位时间为 288 天(范围 45-2279 天)。在同一时间段内,48 例患者因 PH 以外的原因接受了桥接 LVAD 治疗后的 HTX,作为对照组。研究终点为:(i)LVAD 植入后 fPH 的发生,(ii)移植后结局和(iii)严重不良事件的发生率。

结果

LVAD 植入前通过血流动力学导管评估肺动脉阻力为 4.3±1.8 WU。中位支持期 89 天后(四分位距 4-156 天),肺动脉阻力降至 2.0±0.9 WU(P≤0.001),并将患者列入 HTX 名单。研究组 LVAD 支持的中位时间为 288 天(45-2279 天)。我们观察到 2 例(2.5%)研究组患者在 HTX 后发生急性右心衰竭,需要体外机械支持。研究组与对照组(3 年:83.5%,5 年:81.0%)的长期移植后生存率相当(对数秩:P=0.585)。

结论

LVAD 植入作为候选者的桥接可逆转终末期心力衰竭患者的 fPH。HTX 后生存率优异,与 HTX 时无 fPH 患者的结果相当。

相似文献

1
Long-term heart transplant outcomes after lowering fixed pulmonary hypertension using left ventricular assist devices.使用左心室辅助装置降低固定性肺动脉高压后心脏移植的长期预后。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Dec 1;54(6):1116-1121. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy214.
2
Cardiac replacement therapies: outcomes and costs for heart transplantation versus circulatory assist.心脏替代疗法:心脏移植与循环辅助的疗效及成本对比
Scand Cardiovasc J. 2017 Feb;51(1):1-7. doi: 10.1080/14017431.2016.1196826. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
3
Post-cardiac transplant survival after support with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: impact of duration of left ventricular assist device support and other variables.心脏移植后使用持续血流左心室辅助装置的生存情况:左心室辅助装置支持时间和其他变量的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Jul;140(1):174-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.03.037. Epub 2010 May 5.
4
Left ventricular assist devices decrease fixed pulmonary hypertension in cardiac transplant candidates.左心室辅助装置可降低心脏移植候选者的固定性肺动脉高压。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Mar;133(3):689-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.08.104.
5
Pulsatile left ventricular assist device support as a bridge to decision in patients with end-stage heart failure complicated by pulmonary hypertension.在伴有肺动脉高压的终末期心力衰竭患者中,作为决策桥接的搏动性左心室辅助装置支持。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2010 Feb;29(2):201-8. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2009.09.013.
6
A prospective comparison of mid-term outcomes in patients treated with heart transplantation with advanced age donors versus left ventricular assist device implantation.接受高龄供体心脏移植患者与接受左心室辅助装置植入患者中期结局的前瞻性比较。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Oct;23(4):584-92. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw164. Epub 2016 May 30.
7
Mid-term survival after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device versus heart transplantation.持续血流左心室辅助装置与心脏移植后的中期生存率
Heart Vessels. 2016 May;31(5):722-33. doi: 10.1007/s00380-015-0654-4. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
8
Which advanced heart failure therapy strategy is optimal for patients over 60 years old?哪种晚期心力衰竭治疗策略对60岁以上的患者最为合适?
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2019 Apr;60(2):251-258. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.18.10593-3. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
9
Post-transplant survival after lowering fixed pulmonary hypertension using left ventricular assist devices.使用左心室辅助装置降低固定性肺动脉高压后的移植后生存率。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007 Apr;31(4):698-702. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.12.036. Epub 2007 Feb 7.
10
Left ventricular assist device as bridge to heart transplantation--lessons learned with the MicroMed DeBakey axial blood flow pump.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003 Jul;24(1):113-8. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(03)00179-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Who is the Candidate? The Heart Transplant Evaluation Process.谁是候选人?心脏移植评估过程。
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2025 May 15;21(3):13-24. doi: 10.14797/mdcvj.1512. eCollection 2025.
2
SOPRANO: Macitentan in patients with pulmonary hypertension following left ventricular assist device implantation.女高音:左心室辅助装置植入术后肺动脉高压患者使用马昔腾坦的情况。
Pulm Circ. 2024 Dec 4;14(4):e12446. doi: 10.1002/pul2.12446. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Metabolic Consequences of Advanced Chronic Heart Failure and its Modification by Implantation of a Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device.
晚期慢性心力衰竭的代谢后果及其通过植入耐用左心室辅助装置的改善
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Oct 31;25(11):388. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2511388. eCollection 2024 Nov.
4
The Association Between Pulmonary Vascular Resistance and Posttransplant Outcomes Differs by Left Ventricular Assist Device Status.肺血管阻力与移植后结局之间的关联因左心室辅助装置状态而异。
ASAIO J. 2025 Mar 1;71(3):222-228. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000002314. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
5
Invasive Haemodynamic Assessment Before and After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Guide to Current Practice.左心室辅助装置植入前后的有创血流动力学评估:当前实践指南
Interv Cardiol. 2021 Dec 24;16:e34. doi: 10.15420/icr.2021.13. eCollection 2021 Apr.
6
Anaesthesia for heart transplantation.心脏移植的麻醉
BJA Educ. 2021 Aug;21(8):284-291. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2021.02.006. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
7
Pulmonary vasodilator use in continuous-flow left ventricular assist device management.持续血流左心室辅助装置管理中肺血管扩张剂的使用
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Mar;9(6):522. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-4710.
8
Physiology of the Assisted Circulation in Cardiogenic Shock: A State-of-the-Art Perspective.心源休克辅助循环的生理学:最新观点。
Can J Cardiol. 2020 Feb;36(2):170-183. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2019.11.002. Epub 2019 Nov 9.