Suppr超能文献

美国药典标准的价值:文献回顾。

The Value of U.S. Pharmacopeial Standards: A Review of the Literature.

机构信息

Monument Analytics, Baltimore, Maryland 21209; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland 21205.

Monument Analytics, Baltimore, Maryland 21209; Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland 21205.

出版信息

J Pharm Sci. 2018 Oct;107(10):2611-2617. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jun 13.

Abstract

While there are many standard-setting health care organizations, the United States Pharmacopeial Convention's (USP) role includes the creation of documentary and physical standards for therapeutics, including chemical drugs, excipients, and biologics. Despite the ubiquity of these standards, little work has been carried out to characterize and quantify their value. We reviewed the peer-reviewed and gray literature relevant to such evaluations. The review yielded 36 articles, focused variously on accreditation and other standards in health care, the broad impact of pharmacopeial standards and evaluations of specific USP standards. We did not find any study quantifying the impact of USP or other pharmacopeial standards, but many reports have been published that suggest the utility of USP standards to drug development, quality assurance, and public health. Frequently cited areas of impact include equitably advancing the analytical capabilities of manufacturers; enabling the creation of legally enforceable naming conventions; detecting mislabeled and substandard drugs in the marketplace, especially in the context of increased globalization of drug markets; and facilitating the harmonization of diverse international drug quality standards. Our insights provide opportunities for empiric assessments of the effects of USP standards on important outcomes including their promotion of efficient drug development, market competition, drug quality, and patient safety.

摘要

虽然有许多制定标准的医疗保健组织,但美国药典会(USP)的职责包括为治疗药物(包括化学药品、赋形剂和生物制剂)制定文件和物理标准。尽管这些标准无处不在,但很少有工作来描述和量化其价值。我们回顾了与这些评估相关的同行评议和灰色文献。综述产生了 36 篇文章,分别侧重于医疗保健领域的认证和其他标准、药典标准的广泛影响以及对特定 USP 标准的评估。我们没有找到任何量化 USP 或其他药典标准影响的研究,但已经发表了许多报告,表明 USP 标准对药物开发、质量保证和公共卫生具有实用性。经常被引用的影响领域包括公平地提高制造商的分析能力;使创建具有法律约束力的命名约定成为可能;在市场上检测到标签错误和劣质药物,特别是在药物市场全球化日益增加的背景下;以及促进不同国际药物质量标准的协调。我们的观点为评估 USP 标准对重要结果的影响提供了机会,包括促进高效的药物开发、市场竞争、药物质量和患者安全。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验