• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国药典标准的价值:文献回顾。

The Value of U.S. Pharmacopeial Standards: A Review of the Literature.

机构信息

Monument Analytics, Baltimore, Maryland 21209; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland 21205.

Monument Analytics, Baltimore, Maryland 21209; Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland 21205.

出版信息

J Pharm Sci. 2018 Oct;107(10):2611-2617. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jun 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.xphs.2018.06.004
PMID:29908148
Abstract

While there are many standard-setting health care organizations, the United States Pharmacopeial Convention's (USP) role includes the creation of documentary and physical standards for therapeutics, including chemical drugs, excipients, and biologics. Despite the ubiquity of these standards, little work has been carried out to characterize and quantify their value. We reviewed the peer-reviewed and gray literature relevant to such evaluations. The review yielded 36 articles, focused variously on accreditation and other standards in health care, the broad impact of pharmacopeial standards and evaluations of specific USP standards. We did not find any study quantifying the impact of USP or other pharmacopeial standards, but many reports have been published that suggest the utility of USP standards to drug development, quality assurance, and public health. Frequently cited areas of impact include equitably advancing the analytical capabilities of manufacturers; enabling the creation of legally enforceable naming conventions; detecting mislabeled and substandard drugs in the marketplace, especially in the context of increased globalization of drug markets; and facilitating the harmonization of diverse international drug quality standards. Our insights provide opportunities for empiric assessments of the effects of USP standards on important outcomes including their promotion of efficient drug development, market competition, drug quality, and patient safety.

摘要

虽然有许多制定标准的医疗保健组织,但美国药典会(USP)的职责包括为治疗药物(包括化学药品、赋形剂和生物制剂)制定文件和物理标准。尽管这些标准无处不在,但很少有工作来描述和量化其价值。我们回顾了与这些评估相关的同行评议和灰色文献。综述产生了 36 篇文章,分别侧重于医疗保健领域的认证和其他标准、药典标准的广泛影响以及对特定 USP 标准的评估。我们没有找到任何量化 USP 或其他药典标准影响的研究,但已经发表了许多报告,表明 USP 标准对药物开发、质量保证和公共卫生具有实用性。经常被引用的影响领域包括公平地提高制造商的分析能力;使创建具有法律约束力的命名约定成为可能;在市场上检测到标签错误和劣质药物,特别是在药物市场全球化日益增加的背景下;以及促进不同国际药物质量标准的协调。我们的观点为评估 USP 标准对重要结果的影响提供了机会,包括促进高效的药物开发、市场竞争、药物质量和患者安全。

相似文献

1
The Value of U.S. Pharmacopeial Standards: A Review of the Literature.美国药典标准的价值:文献回顾。
J Pharm Sci. 2018 Oct;107(10):2611-2617. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
2
Commentary on the Benefits of US Pharmacopeial Standards: A Generic Pharmaceutical Industry Survey.美国药典标准的优势述评:一项仿制药行业调查。
J Pharm Sci. 2020 Feb;109(2):944-949. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2019.10.008. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
3
Ensuring global access to quality medicines: role of the US Pharmacopeia.确保全球获得高质量药品:美国药典的作用。
J Pharm Sci. 2011 Apr;100(4):1280-7. doi: 10.1002/jps.22391. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
4
Pharmacopeial specifications and analytical data from post-marketing quality sampling and testing programs: A perspective beyond out-of-specification results.市售后质量抽样和测试计划的药典规范和分析数据:超出规格结果之外的视角。
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2020 Jan 30;178:112935. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2019.112935. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
5
Quality specifications for articles of botanical origin from the United States Pharmacopeia.美国药典植物药来源制品的质量规格。
Phytomedicine. 2018 Jun 1;45:105-119. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2018.04.014. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
6
Official USP Reference Standards: metrology concepts, overview, and scientific issues and opportunities.美国药典官方参考标准:计量学概念、概述以及科学问题与机遇。
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2006 Jan 23;40(1):3-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2005.07.017. Epub 2005 Nov 21.
7
A U.S. Pharmacopeia (USP) overview of Pan American botanicals used in dietary supplements and herbal medicines.美国药典(USP)对膳食补充剂和草药中使用的泛美植物药的概述。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Aug 30;15:1426210. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1426210. eCollection 2024.
8
Comparison of simvastatin tablets from the US and international markets obtained via the Internet.通过互联网获取的美国和国际市场上辛伐他汀片的比较。
Ann Pharmacother. 2008 May;42(5):613-20. doi: 10.1345/aph.1K560. Epub 2008 Apr 15.
9
Pharmacopeial Standards for the Quality Control of Botanical Dietary Supplements in the United States.美国植物药膳食补充剂质量控制的药典标准。
J Diet Suppl. 2023;20(3):485-504. doi: 10.1080/19390211.2021.1990171. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
10
Quality of antiretroviral and opportunistic infection medications dispensed from developing countries and Internet pharmacies.从发展中国家及网络药房配发的抗逆转录病毒药物和机会性感染药物的质量。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2015 Feb;40(1):68-75. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12226. Epub 2014 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Ensuring public trust in digital therapeutics: a pharmacopeial perspective.确保公众对数字疗法的信任:一个药典的视角。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Apr;27(4):533-535. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.4.533.
2
Association between US Pharmacopeia (USP) monograph standards, generic entry and prescription drug costs.美国药典(USP)专论标准、仿制药进入市场和处方药费用之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 12;14(11):e0225109. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225109. eCollection 2019.