Suppr超能文献

资源渗漏和过度产生如何影响合作交叉喂养的进化稳健性。

How leaking and overproducing resources affect the evolutionary robustness of cooperative cross-feeding.

机构信息

W. K. Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University, 3700 East Gull Lake Drive, Hickory Corners, MI 49060, United States; School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, 195 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT 06511, United States.

W. K. Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University, 3700 East Gull Lake Drive, Hickory Corners, MI 49060, United States; Population Biology Graduate Group, University of California, Davis, 2320 Storer Hall, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, United States.

出版信息

J Theor Biol. 2018 Oct 7;454:278-291. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2018.06.013. Epub 2018 Jun 14.

Abstract

Cooperative cross-feeding, a resource-exchange mutualism between microbes, is ubiquitous; however, models suggest it should be susceptible to cheating. Recent work suggested two novel mechanisms that could allow cross-feeders to exclude cheaters, even in the absence of tight coupling between cooperative organisms. The first is pattern formation, where cross-feeders form regular patterns so that their resources are separated and cheaters cannot obtain both. The second mechanism is neighbor uncertainty, where demographic stochasticity separates resources so cheaters cannot obtain both. Here we use a stochastic spatial model to test whether those mechanisms are evolutionarily stable, or whether they will collapse under gradual evolution towards reduced resource production. The answer depends on whether a microbe can make the resource for itself without sharing it. If it cannot (i.e. if producing more of a resource means sharing more of a resource), then both mechanisms continue to function. In this case, resource production directly benefits the individual, and cooperation is a byproduct. If microbes can make the resource without sharing it (i.e. if production is an altruistic trait), then neighbor uncertainty completely fails, and pattern formation is weakened. In this case, the costly trait has no direct benefit to the individual, and can only persist if cooperative organisms become associated with their partner. Thus, the novel mechanisms, which operate without tight associations, falter. These results have implications for synthetic ecology, as they suggest that how cross-feeding is engineered will impact its evolutionary stability.

摘要

合作交叉喂养是微生物之间的一种资源交换共生关系,普遍存在;然而,模型表明它容易受到欺骗。最近的工作提出了两种新的机制,可以允许交叉喂养者排除欺骗者,即使在合作生物之间没有紧密的耦合。第一种机制是模式形成,其中交叉喂养者形成规则的模式,从而将它们的资源分离,欺骗者无法同时获得两者。第二种机制是邻居不确定性,其中人口统计学随机性将资源分离,从而欺骗者无法同时获得两者。在这里,我们使用随机空间模型来测试这些机制是否具有进化稳定性,或者它们是否会在朝着减少资源生产的逐渐进化过程中崩溃。答案取决于微生物是否可以在不共享的情况下为自己制造资源。如果它不能(即,如果生产更多的资源意味着共享更多的资源),那么这两种机制都会继续发挥作用。在这种情况下,资源生产直接使个体受益,合作是副产品。如果微生物可以在不共享的情况下制造资源(即,如果生产是一种利他的特征),那么邻居不确定性完全失效,模式形成被削弱。在这种情况下,昂贵的特征对个体没有直接的好处,只有当合作生物与其伙伴相关联时,它才能持续存在。因此,这些新型机制,在没有紧密联系的情况下运作,会失败。这些结果对合成生态学有影响,因为它们表明交叉喂养的设计方式将影响其进化稳定性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验