• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

搭便车-利他主义协同作用在公共物品博弈中。

Cheater-altruist synergy in public goods games.

机构信息

Department of Physics, University of Notre Dame, Nieuwland Science Hall, Notre Dame 46556, USA.

出版信息

J Theor Biol. 2018 Oct 7;454:231-239. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2018.06.012. Epub 2018 Jun 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.jtbi.2018.06.012
PMID:29908187
Abstract

Much research has focused on the deleterious effects of free-riding in public goods games, and a variety of mechanisms that suppress cheating behavior. Here we argue that under certain conditions cheating can be beneficial to the population. In a public goods game, cheaters do not pay for the cost of the public goods, yet they receive the benefit. Although this free-riding harms the entire population in the long run, the success of cheaters may aid the population when there is a common enemy that antagonizes both cooperators and cheaters. Here we study models of the interactions between tumor cells, which play a public goods game, and the immune system. We investigate three population dynamics models of cancer growth combined with a model of effector cell dynamics. We show that under a public good with a limiting benefit, the presence of cheaters aids the tumor in overcoming immune system suppression, and explore the parameter space wherein it occurs. The mechanism of this phenomenon is that a polymorphism of cheaters and altruists optimizes the average growth rate of the tumor, which is what determines whether or not the immune response is overcome. Our results give support for a possible synergy between cooperators and cheaters in ecological public goods games.

摘要

许多研究都集中在公共物品博弈中的搭便车行为的有害影响,以及各种抑制作弊行为的机制上。在这里,我们认为在某些条件下,作弊对种群可能是有益的。在公共物品博弈中,作弊者不为公共物品的成本买单,但却能得到收益。尽管这种搭便车行为从长远来看会损害整个种群,但当存在一个共同的敌人同时对抗合作者和作弊者时,作弊者的成功可能会对种群有利。在这里,我们研究了肿瘤细胞之间相互作用的模型,这些细胞参与了公共物品博弈,以及免疫系统。我们研究了三种结合效应细胞动力学模型的癌症生长的群体动力学模型。我们表明,在具有限制收益的公共物品中,作弊者的存在有助于肿瘤克服免疫系统的抑制,并探索了发生这种情况的参数空间。这种现象的机制是,作弊者和利他主义者的多态性优化了肿瘤的平均增长率,这决定了免疫反应是否被克服。我们的结果为生态公共物品博弈中合作者和作弊者之间可能存在协同作用提供了支持。

相似文献

1
Cheater-altruist synergy in public goods games.搭便车-利他主义协同作用在公共物品博弈中。
J Theor Biol. 2018 Oct 7;454:231-239. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2018.06.012. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
2
Group-size diversity in public goods games.公共物品博弈中的群体规模多样性。
Evolution. 2012 Mar;66(3):623-636. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01504.x. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
3
Cooperation as a volunteer's dilemma and the strategy of conflict in public goods games.合作作为一种志愿者困境和公共物品博弈中的冲突策略。
J Evol Biol. 2009 Nov;22(11):2192-200. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01835.x. Epub 2009 Sep 3.
4
Evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods games with common resource dynamics.具有共同资源动态的空间公共品博弈中合作的演化
J Theor Biol. 2007 Aug 21;247(4):616-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.04.008. Epub 2007 Apr 12.
5
Coexistence of cooperation and defection in public goods games.公共物品博弈中的合作与背叛共存。
Evolution. 2011 Apr;65(4):1140-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01185.x. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
6
The durability of public goods changes the dynamics and nature of social dilemmas.公共物品的耐久性改变了社会困境的动态和本质。
PLoS One. 2007 Jul 4;2(7):e593. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000593.
7
Punishment in public goods games leads to meta-stable phase transitions and hysteresis.公共物品博弈中的惩罚会导致亚稳相变和滞后现象。
Phys Biol. 2015 Jun 2;12(4):046005. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/12/4/046005.
8
Fast cheater migration stabilizes coexistence in a public goods dilemma on networks.快速的作弊者迁移稳定了网络公共品困境中的共存状态。
Theor Popul Biol. 2018 May;121:12-25. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2018.03.007. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
9
Ecological public goods games: cooperation and bifurcation.生态公共物品博弈:合作与分歧
Theor Popul Biol. 2008 Mar;73(2):257-63. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2007.11.007. Epub 2007 Dec 7.
10
Evolutionary games and population dynamics: maintenance of cooperation in public goods games.进化博弈与种群动态:公共物品博弈中合作的维持
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Oct 7;273(1600):2565-70. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3600.

引用本文的文献

1
Ecology and games in cancer: new insights into the disease.癌症中的生态学与博弈:对该疾病的新见解
Pathologica. 2022 Oct;114(5):347-351. doi: 10.32074/1591-951X-798.