Department of Chemistry, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2018 Aug 15;1092:207-219. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
Major obstacles to formulating a simple retention mechanism for reversed-phase liquid chromatography have a direct impact on the development of experimental methods for column characterization as they limit our capability to understand observed differences in retention at a system level. These problems arise from the heterogeneous composition of the stationary phase, the difficulty of providing a working definition for the phase ratio, and uncertainty as to whether the distribution mechanism for varied compounds is a partition, adsorption or mixed (combination) of these models. Retention factor and separation factor measurements offer little guidance as they represent an average of various and variable contributing factors that can only be interpreted by assuming a specific model. Column characterization methods have tended to ignore these difficulties by inventing a series of terms to describe column properties, such as hydrophobicity, hydrophilicity, silanol activity, steric resistance, etc., without proper definition. This has allowed multiple scales to be proposed for the same property which generally are only weakly correlated. Against this background we review the major approaches for the characterization of alkylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phases employing prototypical compounds, the hydrophobic-subtraction model and the solvation parameter model. Those methods using prototypical compounds are limited by the lack of compounds with a singular dominant interaction. The multivariate approaches that extract column characteristic properties from the retention of varied compounds are more hopeful but it is important to be more precise in defining the characteristic column properties and cognizant that general interpretation of these properties for varied columns cannot escape the problem of a poor understanding of the distribution mechanism.
制定反相液相色谱简单保留机制的主要障碍直接影响到柱特征化实验方法的发展,因为它们限制了我们从系统水平理解观察到的保留差异的能力。这些问题源于固定相的不均匀组成、为相比例提供工作定义的困难,以及对于不同化合物的分配机制是分配、吸附还是这些模型的混合(组合)的不确定性。保留因子和分离因子的测量几乎没有指导意义,因为它们代表了各种不同贡献因素的平均值,只能通过假设特定模型来解释。柱特征化方法通过发明一系列术语来描述柱性质,例如疏水性、亲水性、硅醇活性、空间位阻等,而没有适当的定义,从而忽略了这些困难。这使得同一性质可以提出多个尺度,而这些尺度通常相关性较弱。在此背景下,我们综述了使用原型化合物、疏水扣除模型和溶剂化参数模型表征烷基硅氧烷键合硅胶固定相的主要方法。那些使用原型化合物的方法受到缺乏具有单一主导相互作用的化合物的限制。从不同化合物的保留中提取柱特征性质的多元方法更有希望,但重要的是要更精确地定义特征柱性质,并认识到对不同柱的这些性质的一般解释不能回避对分配机制理解不佳的问题。