Cardiovascular Center, Yokosuka Kyosai Hospital, Yokosuka, Japan.
Cardiovascular Center, Yokosuka Kyosai Hospital, Yokosuka, Japan.
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Nov 1;270:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.05.117. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
Echo-attenuated plaque (EA) on intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is related to poor outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. However, the clinical significance of EA in stable angina pectoris (SAP) patients compared with that in ACS patients remains unclear. We assessed the relationships between EA and unstable plaque characteristics in patients with ACS and SAP.
We investigated 609 coronary lesions in 609 patients (234 with ACS; 375 with SAP) undergoing pre-intervention IVUS and optical coherence tomography (OCT). The differences in plaque morphology and post-PCI outcomes were assessed according to the clinical status of ACS or SAP and the presence or absence of EA.
EA was more frequent in patients with ACS than in those with SAP (44.0% vs. 25.1%, p < 0.001). SAP-EA lesions showed thicker fibrous cap (157 ± 97 μm vs. 100 ± 58 μm, p < 0.001), smaller lipid arc (208 ± 76° vs. 266 ± 99°, p < 0.001), smaller plaque burden (83.0 ± 6.1% vs. 86.5 ± 4.1%, p < 0.001), and lower frequency of transient slow-reflow phenomenon during PCI (21.3% vs. 51.5%, p < 0.001) than ACS-EA lesions, but similar plaque vulnerability compared with ACS-non-EA lesions. SAP-EA lesions had less frequent OCT-thrombus than ACS-non-EA lesions (20.2% vs. 71.2%, p < 0.001).
SAP-EA lesions had less plaque vulnerability than ACS-EA lesions, but were comparable to ACS-non-EA lesions. Less frequent thrombus formation might differentiate SAP-EA lesions from ACS-non-EA lesions. A combined IVUS and OCT approach might be useful to assess plaque vulnerability in SAP-EA lesions compared with ACS lesions.
血管内超声(IVUS)回声衰减斑块(EA)与急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后的不良预后相关。然而,与 ACS 患者相比,EA 在稳定性心绞痛(SAP)患者中的临床意义尚不清楚。我们评估了 EA 与 ACS 和 SAP 患者不稳定斑块特征之间的关系。
我们对 609 例接受介入前 IVUS 和光学相干断层扫描(OCT)检查的患者的 609 个冠状动脉病变进行了研究。根据 ACS 或 SAP 的临床状况以及 EA 的存在与否,评估斑块形态和 PCI 后的结果差异。
ACS 患者中 EA 的发生率高于 SAP 患者(44.0% vs. 25.1%,p<0.001)。SAP-EA 病变的纤维帽更厚(157±97 μm vs. 100±58 μm,p<0.001),脂质弧度更小(208±76° vs. 266±99°,p<0.001),斑块负荷更小(83.0±6.1% vs. 86.5±4.1%,p<0.001),PCI 期间短暂慢血流现象的发生率更低(21.3% vs. 51.5%,p<0.001),但与 ACS-non-EA 病变相比,斑块易损性相似。SAP-EA 病变的 OCT 血栓比 ACS-non-EA 病变少见(20.2% vs. 71.2%,p<0.001)。
SAP-EA 病变的斑块易损性低于 ACS-EA 病变,但与 ACS-non-EA 病变相当。血栓形成的频率较低可能将 SAP-EA 病变与 ACS-non-EA 病变区分开来。与 ACS 病变相比,IVUS 和 OCT 联合应用可能有助于评估 SAP-EA 病变的斑块易损性。