Van Meter Anna, Goldstein Benjamin I, Goldstein Tina R, Yen Shirley, Hower Heather, Strober Michael, Merranko John A, Gill Mary Kay, Diler Rasim S, Axelson David, Ryan Neal D, Keller Martin B, Birmaher Boris
The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY 11004, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, 2075 Bayview Ave., FG-53, Toronto, ON M4N-3M5, Canada.
J Affect Disord. 2018 Oct 1;238:375-382. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.06.023. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
Most studies of pediatric bipolar disorder (BP) combine youth who have manic symptoms, but do not meet criteria for BP I/II, into one "not otherwise specified" (NOS) group. Consequently, little is known about how youth with cyclothymic disorder (CycD) differ from youth with BP NOS. The objective of this study was to determine whether youth with a research diagnosis of CycD (RDCyc) differ from youth with operationalized BP NOS.
Participants from the Course and Outcome of Bipolar Youth study were evaluated to determine whether they met RDCyc criteria. Characteristics of RDCyc youth and BP NOS youth were compared at baseline, and over eight-years follow-up.
Of 154 youth (average age 11.96 (3.3), 42% female), 29 met RDCyc criteria. RDCyc youth were younger (p = .04) at baseline. Over follow-up, RDCyc youth were more likely to have a disruptive behavior disorder (p = .01), and were more likely to experience irritability (p = .03), mood reactivity (p = .02), and rejection sensitivity (p = .03). BP NOS youth were more likely to develop hypomania (p = .02), or depression (p = .02), and tended to have mood episodes earlier in the eight-year follow-up period.
RDCyc diagnoses were made retrospectively and followed stringent criteria, which may highlight differences that, under typical clinical conditions and more vague criteria, would not be evident.
There were few differences between RDCyc and BP NOS youth. However, the ways in which the groups diverged could have implications; chronic subsyndromal mood symptoms may portend a severe, but ultimately non-bipolar, course. Longer follow-up is necessary to determine the trajectory and outcomes of CycD symptoms.
大多数关于儿童双相情感障碍(BP)的研究将有躁狂症状但不符合BP I/II标准的青少年合并为一个“未另行规定”(NOS)组。因此,对于环形心境障碍(CycD)青少年与BP NOS青少年如何不同知之甚少。本研究的目的是确定研究诊断为CycD(RDCyc)的青少年与操作性BP NOS青少年是否存在差异。
对双相情感障碍青少年病程与转归研究中的参与者进行评估,以确定他们是否符合RDCyc标准。在基线时以及八年的随访期间,比较了RDCyc青少年和BP NOS青少年的特征。
在154名青少年(平均年龄11.96(3.3)岁,42%为女性)中,29名符合RDCyc标准。RDCyc青少年在基线时年龄更小(p = 0.04)。在随访期间,RDCyc青少年更有可能患有破坏性行为障碍(p = 0.01),并且更有可能经历易激惹(p = 0.03)、情绪反应性(p = 0.02)和拒绝敏感性(p = 0.03)。BP NOS青少年更有可能发展为轻躁狂(p = 0.02)或抑郁(p = 0.02),并且在八年随访期内情绪发作往往更早。
RDCyc诊断是回顾性做出的,且遵循严格标准,这可能凸显出在典型临床条件和更模糊标准下不明显的差异。
RDCyc青少年和BP NOS青少年之间差异不大。然而,两组出现差异的方式可能具有影响;慢性亚综合征性情绪症状可能预示着一种严重但最终并非双相情感障碍的病程。需要更长时间的随访来确定CycD症状的发展轨迹和转归。