Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome (RM), Italy.
Department of Experimental Medicine and Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018 Oct 25;56(11):1838-1845. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2018-0310.
There is a compelling need for quality tools that enable effective control of the extra-analytical phase. In this regard, Six Sigma seems to offer a valid methodological and conceptual opportunity, and in recent times, the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine has adopted it for indicating the performance requirements for non-analytical laboratory processes. However, the Six Sigma implies a distinction between short-term and long-term quality that is based on the dynamics of the processes. These concepts are still not widespread and applied in the field of laboratory medicine although they are of fundamental importance to exploit the full potential of this methodology. This paper reviews the Six Sigma quality concepts and shows how they originated from Shewhart's control charts, in respect of which they are not an alternative but a completion. It also discusses the dynamic nature of process and how it arises, concerning particularly the long-term dynamic mean variation, and explains why this leads to the fundamental distinction of quality we previously mentioned.
对于能够有效控制分析前阶段的高质量工具,存在着强烈的需求。在这方面,六西格玛似乎提供了一种有效的方法学和概念性机会,最近,国际临床化学和实验室医学联合会已将其用于指示非分析实验室过程的性能要求。然而,六西格玛意味着基于过程动态的短期和长期质量之间的区别。这些概念在实验室医学领域尚未得到广泛应用和应用,尽管它们对于充分发挥这种方法的潜力至关重要。本文回顾了六西格玛质量概念,并展示了它们如何源自休哈特的控制图,就这一点而言,它们不是替代关系,而是补充关系。它还讨论了过程的动态性质以及它是如何产生的,特别是关于长期动态均值变化,并解释了为什么这会导致我们之前提到的质量的基本区别。