Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, University Campus Bio-Medico, Alvaro del Portillo 21, 00128, Rome, Italy.
Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Calcif Tissue Int. 2018 Oct;103(4):359-371. doi: 10.1007/s00223-018-0437-x. Epub 2018 Jun 16.
This study aimed to describe clinical outcomes in patients prescribed teriparatide and followed up for 18 months after stopping the drug in real-life conditions. The Extended Forsteo® Observational Study analysed incident clinical fractures in 6-month intervals using logistic regression with repeated measures. Changes in back pain (visual analogue scale) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL; EQ-5D questionnaire) were analysed using mixed models for repeated measures. Patients were analysed if they had a post-baseline visit, regardless of whether and for how long they took teriparatide. Of 1531 patients analysed (90.7% female, mean age: 70.3 years), 76 (5.0%) never took teriparatide. Median treatment duration was 23.6 months. The adjusted odds of clinical fracture decreased by 47% in the > 12- to 18-month treatment period (p = 0.013) compared with the first 6-month period, with no statistically significant reduction in the > 18- to 24-month interval. The clinical fracture rate remained stable during the 18 months' post-teriparatide, when approximately 98% of patients took osteoporosis medication (51% bisphosphonates). Clinical vertebral fractures were reduced at every time period compared with the first 6 months. Adjusted mean back pain scores decreased and EQ-5D scores increased significantly at each post-baseline observation. In a real-life clinical setting, the risk of clinical fractures declined during 24 months of teriparatide treatment. This reduction was maintained 18 months after stopping teriparatide. In parallel, patients reported significant improvements in back pain and HRQoL. The results should be interpreted in the context of the non-controlled design of this observational study.
本研究旨在描述在真实环境下停止药物治疗后 18 个月内接受特立帕肽治疗并随访的患者的临床结局。延长福司特观察研究(Extended Forsteo® Observational Study)使用具有重复测量的逻辑回归分析 6 个月间隔的临床骨折事件。使用重复测量混合模型分析背痛(视觉模拟量表)和健康相关生活质量(EQ-5D 问卷)的变化。无论患者是否以及使用特立帕肽的时间长短,只要有基线后访视,就对其进行分析。在 1531 名接受分析的患者中(90.7%为女性,平均年龄:70.3 岁),76 名(5.0%)从未使用过特立帕肽。中位治疗时间为 23.6 个月。与前 6 个月相比,在 >12-18 个月的治疗期间,临床骨折的调整后优势比降低了 47%(p=0.013),而在 >18-24 个月的间隔内则没有统计学意义上的降低。在特立帕肽治疗后 18 个月期间,临床骨折发生率保持稳定,此时约 98%的患者使用骨质疏松症药物(51%为双磷酸盐)。与前 6 个月相比,每个时间点的临床椎体骨折都减少了。与前 6 个月相比,每个时间点的调整后背痛评分均降低,EQ-5D 评分均显著增加。在真实的临床环境中,特立帕肽治疗 24 个月后,临床骨折风险下降。停止特立帕肽治疗 18 个月后,这种降低仍得以维持。与此同时,患者报告背痛和 HRQoL 显著改善。应该在本观察性研究的非对照设计的背景下解释这些结果。