Lassiter Charles, Norasakkunkit Vinai, Shuman Benjamin, Toivonen Tuukka
Department of Philosophy, Gonzaga University, Spokane, WA, United States.
Department of Psychology, Gonzaga University, Spokane, WA, United States.
Front Psychol. 2018 Jun 1;9:812. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00812. eCollection 2018.
We argue that two society-level properties-resistance to change and diversity within a culture-significantly affect agents' degrees of marginalization, which is here defined as access to cultural knowledge and institutional means for accomplishing cultural goals. We develop an agent-based model using findings from Norasakkunkit et al. (Norasakkunkit and Uchida, 2011, 2014; Norasakkunkit et al., 2012). We found that varying the degrees of resistance to change and diversity affected similarities between the mainstream subculture and other subcultures, changes in subcultures over time, and the relative population proportion of each subculture. In particular, we found that high diversity and low resistance to change created the greatest cultural changes within the marginalized subculture over time and allowed for maximal growth of rebellious subcultures. Also, low diversity and high resistance to change allowed for maximal growth of the marginalized subcultures and the greatest overlap between the marginalized and mainstream subcultures. These have important implications for understanding the emergence and maintenance of marginalization in post-industrial societies.
我们认为,社会层面的两个属性——对变革的抵制以及文化内部的多样性——会显著影响个体的边缘化程度,这里的边缘化程度定义为获取文化知识以及实现文化目标的制度手段。我们利用诺拉萨昆基特等人(诺拉萨昆基特和内田,2011年、2014年;诺拉萨昆基特等人,2012年)的研究结果开发了一个基于主体的模型。我们发现,改变对变革的抵制程度和多样性会影响主流亚文化与其他亚文化之间的相似性、亚文化随时间的变化以及各亚文化的相对人口比例。特别是,我们发现,高多样性和低变革抵制随着时间的推移在边缘化亚文化中产生了最大的文化变化,并使叛逆亚文化实现了最大程度的增长。此外,低多样性和高变革抵制使边缘化亚文化实现了最大程度的增长,并使边缘化亚文化与主流亚文化之间的重叠度达到最大。这些对于理解后工业社会中边缘化的出现和维持具有重要意义。