Department of Anaesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CCM, CVK), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany; Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Department of Anaesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CCM, CVK), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany; Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2018 Aug;129(8):1642-1648. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.05.013. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
In pediatric patients, anaesthesia induction is often performed with intravenous Propofol or Sevoflurane inhalation. Although epileptiform discharges have been observed during inductions with Sevoflurane, their occurrence has not been investigated for i.v. Propofol inductions. The aim of this study is to compare the incidence of epileptiform discharges in children during anaesthesia induction using Propofol versus Sevoflurane.
Prospective, observational cohort study in children aged 0.5-8 years undergoing elective surgery. Children were anaesthetized with either Propofol or Sevoflurane. Bi-frontal electroencephalograms electrodes were placed before start of anaesthesia. Visual electroencephalogram analysis was performed from start of anesthetic agent administration until Intubation with regard to identify epileptiform patterns, i.e. delta with spikes; rhythmic polyspikes; periodic, epileptiform discharges; or suppression with spikes.
39 children were anaesthetized with Propofol, and 18 children with Sevoflurane. Epileptiform discharges were seen in 36% of the children in the Propofol group, versus 67% in the Sevoflurane group (p = 0.03). Incidence of the distinct types of epileptiform discharge differed for periodic, epileptiform discharges (Sevoflurane group 39% vs. Propofol group 3%; p < 0.001). Higher concentration of Remifentanil (≥0.15 µg/kg/min) was associated with less frequent epileptiform discharges (Exp 5.8; CI 95% 1.6/21.2; p = 0.008).
Propofol i.v. induction of anaesthesia in children triggers epileptiform discharges, whereas to a lesser extent than Sevoflurane does.
Presuming that epileptiform discharges have an impact on postoperative brain function, it is advisable to use Propofol rather than Sevoflurane and higher level of Remifentanil for anaesthesia induction in children.
在儿科患者中,常采用静脉注射异丙酚或七氟醚吸入进行麻醉诱导。虽然在七氟醚诱导过程中观察到癫痫样放电,但尚未对静脉注射异丙酚诱导进行研究。本研究旨在比较儿童在异丙酚和七氟醚麻醉诱导过程中癫痫样放电的发生率。
对 0.5-8 岁行择期手术的儿童进行前瞻性观察队列研究。儿童接受异丙酚或七氟醚麻醉。在开始麻醉前放置双额部脑电图电极。从麻醉剂开始给药到插管开始进行视觉脑电图分析,以识别癫痫样模式,即尖波的 delta 波;节律性多棘波;周期性癫痫样放电;或带尖波的抑制。
39 例儿童用异丙酚麻醉,18 例儿童用七氟醚麻醉。异丙酚组 36%的儿童出现癫痫样放电,七氟醚组 67%的儿童出现癫痫样放电(p=0.03)。周期性癫痫样放电的不同类型癫痫样放电的发生率不同(七氟醚组 39%,异丙酚组 3%;p<0.001)。瑞芬太尼浓度较高(≥0.15μg/kg/min)与癫痫样放电较少相关(Exp 5.8;95%CI 1.6/21.2;p=0.008)。
儿童静脉注射异丙酚麻醉诱导会引发癫痫样放电,但其程度低于七氟醚。
如果假定癫痫样放电对术后脑功能有影响,那么在儿童中,建议使用异丙酚而不是七氟醚,以及较高水平的瑞芬太尼进行麻醉诱导。