Mohn Christine, Vassend Olav, Knardahl Stein
Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Mental Health and Addiction, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen, Norway.
Scand J Pain. 2011 Apr 1;2(2):72-82. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2010.12.001.
Background and purpose Psychophysiological factors may contribute to the development of temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Both local orofacial and systemic responses have been investigated. However, most studies have concentrated on physiological responding during cognitive challenges, while responses during painful tasks may be highly relevant for the development of chronic pain conditions. Moreover, the relationship between experimental challenges and physiological responding may be influenced by affective responses during the experimental tasks, an issue not often considered in the literature. Methods This study compared electromyography (EMG) of the left masseter and left trapezius muscles, orofacial and digital skin blood-flow (SBF), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart rate (HR) at rest, during orofacial isometric contraction, electrocutaneous pain stimulation of the left hand, pressure pain stimulation of the masseter muscle and the sternum, and three cognitive tasks (reading aloud, a simulated job interview, and visuomotoric tracking). The participants were 25 TMD patients and 25 matched pain-free controls, all females. Affective responses were assessed with the State part of the State-Trait Personality Inventory and with Visual Analogue Scales. Results Masseter EMG levels were significantly lower in the TMD group relative to the control group during jaw contraction, pressure pain stimulation, the relaxation periods, and cognitive tasks. SBF, MAP, and HR responses were largely similar in the two groups, with SBF responses to pain stimulation evident at lower levels of stimulation than previously found. The TMD patients reported significantly higher levels of negative affect during the experiment. Conclusions and implications The low EMG responses in the TMD group may be taken in support of the Pain Adaptation Model of musculoskeletal pain, in which reduced muscular activity serves to protect a painful area. However, it may also be supportive of the Integrated Pain Adaptation Model, where higher central nervous structures influence local muscular output. The group similarities in systemic physiological responding in combination with the elevated levels of negative state affect in the TMD patients confirm previous reports of psychosocial differences being more reliable indicators of TMD than generalized physiological responding.
背景与目的 心理生理因素可能导致颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)的发生。局部口面部及全身反应均已得到研究。然而,大多数研究集中于认知挑战期间的生理反应,而疼痛任务期间的反应可能与慢性疼痛状况的发展高度相关。此外,实验挑战与生理反应之间的关系可能受实验任务期间情感反应的影响,这一问题在文献中较少被考虑。方法 本研究比较了25名TMD患者和25名匹配的无疼痛对照女性在静息状态、口面部等长收缩、左手经皮电刺激疼痛、咬肌和胸骨压力疼痛刺激以及三项认知任务(大声朗读、模拟求职面试和视觉运动跟踪)期间左侧咬肌和左侧斜方肌的肌电图(EMG)、口面部和手指皮肤血流量(SBF)、平均动脉压(MAP)和心率(HR)。情感反应通过状态 - 特质人格量表的状态部分和视觉模拟量表进行评估。结果 在咬肌收缩、压力疼痛刺激、放松期和认知任务期间,TMD组的咬肌EMG水平相对于对照组显著降低。两组的SBF、MAP和HR反应在很大程度上相似,对疼痛刺激的SBF反应在比先前发现的更低刺激水平时就很明显。TMD患者在实验期间报告的消极情绪水平显著更高。结论与启示 TMD组较低的EMG反应可能支持肌肉骨骼疼痛的疼痛适应模型,其中肌肉活动减少有助于保护疼痛区域。然而,这也可能支持综合疼痛适应模型,即更高的中枢神经结构影响局部肌肉输出。TMD患者全身生理反应的组间相似性以及消极状态情感水平的升高证实了先前的报道,即心理社会差异比一般生理反应更可靠地指示TMD。