Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, 71 Hedi Road, Qingxiu District, Nanning, Guangxi, 530021, People's Republic of China.
J Ovarian Res. 2018 Jun 18;11(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13048-018-0422-z.
The treatment of newly diagnosed advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) was predicted by an ovarian cancer computed tomography (CT) evaluation model combined with serum CA125.
Clinical data for 194 patients with advanced EOC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) combined with interval debulking surgery (IDS) or primary debulking surgery (PDS) were retrospectively analyzed, and the appropriate treatment was predicted by comparing the subgroup differences in intraoperative situations, postoperative situations and survival rates.
There were no significant differences with respect to operation time, intraoperative blood loss, ideal tumor cytoreductive rate or postoperative complication rate between the NACT + IDS group and the PDS group with scores less than 5 (score < 5) (p = 0.764, p = 0.504, p = 0.906, p = 0.176). However, there was a statistically significant difference in overall survival rate between the two groups (p = 0.029), with better survival in the PDS group than in the NACT + IDS group. There were significant differences between the NACT + IDS group and the PDS group with scores greater than or equal to 5 (score ≥ 5). The former was better than the latter in terms of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, ideal tumor cytoreductive rate, and postoperative complication rate (p = 0.002, p = 0.040, p = 0.014, p = 0.021). However, there was no significant difference in overall survival rate between the two groups (p = 0.383).
According to the new evaluation system, for a score < 5, we suggest that patients with newly diagnosed advanced EOC undergo PDS; for a score ≥ 5, we recommend NACT + IDS.
新诊断的晚期上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)的治疗可以通过卵巢癌 CT 评估模型与血清 CA125 相结合来预测。
回顾性分析 194 例接受新辅助化疗(NACT)联合间隔减瘤术(IDS)或直接减瘤术(PDS)治疗的晚期 EOC 患者的临床资料,通过比较术中情况、术后情况和生存率的亚组差异,预测合适的治疗方法。
评分<5(评分<5)的 NACT+IDS 组和 PDS 组在手术时间、术中出血量、理想肿瘤细胞减灭率或术后并发症发生率方面差异均无统计学意义(p=0.764、p=0.504、p=0.906、p=0.176)。但两组总生存率存在统计学差异(p=0.029),PDS 组的生存情况优于 NACT+IDS 组。评分≥5(评分≥5)的 NACT+IDS 组与 PDS 组之间存在显著差异。前者在手术时间、术中出血量、理想肿瘤细胞减灭率和术后并发症发生率方面优于后者(p=0.002、p=0.040、p=0.014、p=0.021)。但两组总生存率差异无统计学意义(p=0.383)。
根据新的评估系统,对于评分<5 的患者,我们建议行 PDS;对于评分≥5 的患者,我们推荐 NACT+IDS。