Suppr超能文献

CYP2C19基因多态性与西洛他唑对神经血管内治疗中氯吡格雷抵抗的附加作用之间的关联。

Association between CYP2C19 genotype and the additional effect of cilostazol to clopidogrel resistance in neuroendovascular therapy.

作者信息

Tajima Hayato, Izumi Takashi, Miyachi Shigeru, Matsubara Noriaki, Ito Masashi, Imai Tasuku, Nishihori Masahiro, Shintai Kazunori, Okamoto Sho, Araki Yoshio, Kumakura Yasuo, Furukawa-Hibi Yoko, Yamada Kiyofumi, Wakabayashi Toshihiko

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Handa City Hospital, Handa, Japan.

Department of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.

出版信息

Nagoya J Med Sci. 2018 May;80(2):207-215. doi: 10.18999/nagjms.80.2.207.

Abstract

We investigated the association between genotype and additional effect of cilostazol on clopidogrel resistance (CR) in neuroendovascular therapy. Between January 2012 and January 2016, 447 consecutive patients were administered with 75-mg cilostazol/day. The VerifyNow System was used for evaluating P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) > 230 and/or percentage inhibition of platelet function (% Inhibition) ≤ 20 as CR. Among 158 patients with CR, 31 were administered with additional 100- or 200-mg cilostazol/day and their platelet function was evaluated. According to genotypes revealed using the Spartan RX and DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit, patients were classified into three phenotypic groups: extensive metabolizer (EM, three patients), intermediate metabolizer (IM, 12 patients), and poor metabolizer (PM, 16 patients). Administration of additional cilostazol decreased PRU (EM group: 160.7 ± 85.2 after vs 278.3 ± 40.1 before, = 0.15; IM group: 205.6 ± 74.0 vs 254.3 ± 35.0, = 0.02; and PM group: 227.8 ± 52.2 vs 282.1 ± 30.4, = 0.003), and increased % Inhibition (EM group: 40.0 ± 27.9 vs 9.3 ± 3.8, = 0.25; IM group: 31.4 ± 18.0 vs 11.8 ± 8.2, = 0.001; and PM group: 24.6 ± 15.0 vs 10.4 ± 9.3, = 0.001). However, the rate of normalized-clopidogrel response, thromboembolic lesions, and bleeding complications were not significantly different among the three groups. Thus, the addition of cilostazol was effective on CR in terms of PRU, % Inhibition, rate of change of normalized-clopidogrel response, thromboembolic events, and bleeding complications irrespective of phenotype.

摘要

我们研究了西洛他唑基因型与神经血管内治疗中其对氯吡格雷抵抗(CR)的附加作用之间的关联。2012年1月至2016年1月期间,连续447例患者接受每日75毫克西洛他唑治疗。使用VerifyNow系统将P2Y12反应单位(PRU)>230和/或血小板功能抑制百分比(%抑制)≤20评估为CR。在158例CR患者中,31例患者额外接受每日100或200毫克西洛他唑治疗,并评估其血小板功能。根据使用Spartan RX和DNeasy Blood & Tissue试剂盒揭示的基因型,患者被分为三个表型组:广泛代谢者(EM,3例患者)、中间代谢者(IM,12例患者)和慢代谢者(PM,16例患者)。额外给予西洛他唑可降低PRU(EM组:治疗后为160.7±85.2,治疗前为278.3±40.1,P = 0.15;IM组:205.6±74.0对254.3±35.0,P = 0.02;PM组:227.8±52.2对282.1±30.4,P = 0.003),并增加%抑制(EM组:40.0±27.9对9.3±3.8,P = 0.25;IM组:31.4±18.0对11.8±8.2,P = 0.001;PM组:24.6±15.0对10.4±9.3,P = 0.001)。然而,三组之间氯吡格雷反应正常化率、血栓栓塞性病变和出血并发症并无显著差异。因此,无论表型如何,添加西洛他唑在PRU、%抑制、氯吡格雷反应正常化变化率、血栓栓塞事件和出血并发症方面对CR均有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5f3/5995740/cabad0f652ef/2186-3326-80-0207-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验