• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜辅助微钻镫骨切除术:与传统技术的比较。

Endoscope-Assisted Stapedotomy with Microdrill: Comparison with a Conventional Technique.

作者信息

Plodpai Yuvatiya, Atchariyasathian Viraporn, Khaimook Wandee

出版信息

J Med Assoc Thai. 2017 Feb;100(2):190-6.

PMID:29916630
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare endoscope-assisted microdrill stapedotomy with the conventional technique.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A retrospective comparative study of 37 otosclerosis stapes fixation surgeries performed with the conventional technique or the endoscope-assisted microdrill stapedotomy were evaluated. Audiometric data and intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded.

RESULTS

The mean operating time was 128 min in the endoscopic group and 132 min in the conventional group, (p = 0.72). Residual air-bone gaps of ≤10 decibels were obtained in 83.3% and 47.4% of the patients in the endoscopic group and the conventional group, respectively, (p = 0.04). No footplate fractures and incidences of postoperative vertigo and chorda tympani nerve injuries were found in the endoscopic group. Postoperative vertigo was found in 31.6% of the conventional group, and 26.3% of the patients in the conventional group had undergone an endaural surgical approach owing to inadequate exposure under the microscope.

CONCLUSION

An endoscope-assisted microdrill stapedotomy was associated with significantly better hearing results, a lower postoperative vertigo rate, and fewer footplate fractures and chorda tympani nerve injuries than the conventional technique.

摘要

目的

比较内镜辅助微钻镫骨切除术与传统技术。

材料与方法

对37例采用传统技术或内镜辅助微钻镫骨切除术进行的耳硬化镫骨固定手术进行回顾性比较研究。记录听力数据以及术中及术后并发症。

结果

内镜组平均手术时间为128分钟,传统组为132分钟,(p = 0.72)。内镜组和传统组分别有83.3%和47.4%的患者获得了≤10分贝的残余气骨间隙,(p = 0.04)。内镜组未发现镫骨底板骨折以及术后眩晕和鼓索神经损伤的情况。传统组有31.6%的患者出现术后眩晕,并且由于显微镜下暴露不足,传统组有26.3%的患者采用了耳内手术入路。

结论

与传统技术相比,内镜辅助微钻镫骨切除术的听力结果明显更好,术后眩晕率更低,镫骨底板骨折和鼓索神经损伤更少。

相似文献

1
Endoscope-Assisted Stapedotomy with Microdrill: Comparison with a Conventional Technique.内镜辅助微钻镫骨切除术:与传统技术的比较。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2017 Feb;100(2):190-6.
2
Microdrill in endoscopic stapes surgery: Is it safe?耳内镜镫骨手术中的微钻:安全吗?
Am J Otolaryngol. 2020 Nov-Dec;41(6):102666. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102666. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
3
Stapedotomy using a 4 mm endoscope: any advantage over a microscope?使用4毫米内窥镜的镫骨手术:与显微镜相比有何优势?
J Laryngol Otol. 2018 Sep;132(9):807-811. doi: 10.1017/S0022215118001548. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
4
Endoscopic stapedotomy: a comparison between 4 mm and 3 mm nasal endoscope.经鼻内镜下镫骨切除术:4mm 与 3mm 鼻内镜的比较。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Nov;276(11):3035-3041. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05592-5. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
5
Microdrill stapedotomy for otosclerosis with small and large preoperative air-bone gap: a retrospective comparison of results.小、大术前气骨导差的耳硬化症行微钻镫骨切开术:结果的回顾性比较。
Acta Otolaryngol. 2020 Sep;140(9):745-748. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2020.1764618. Epub 2020 May 20.
6
Endoscopic Stapedotomy: Overcoming Limitations of Operating Microscope.内镜镫骨切开术:克服手术显微镜的局限性。
Ear Nose Throat J. 2021 Feb;100(2):103-109. doi: 10.1177/0145561319862216. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
7
Endoscopic Versus Microscopic Stapedotomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.内镜与显微镜镫骨切开术的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Laryngoscope. 2024 May;134(5):2395-2400. doi: 10.1002/lary.31241. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
8
Reliability of microdrill stapedotomy: comparison with pick stapedotomy.微钻镫骨切除术的可靠性:与挑针镫骨切除术的比较。
Otol Neurotol. 2007 Dec;28(8):998-1001. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31815a3548.
9
Endoscopic Stapes Surgery: A Comparison With Microscopic Surgery.内镜镫骨手术:与显微镜手术的比较
Otol Neurotol. 2017 Jun;38(5):662-666. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001371.
10
Endoscopic stapes surgery: How I do it?内镜镫骨手术:我的操作方法
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2021;19(75):387-389.

引用本文的文献

1
Update on stapes surgery.镫骨手术的最新进展。
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2025 Jun;45(Suppl. 1):S29-S39. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-suppl.1_3-45-2025-A1336.
2
Outcomes of Endoscopic Stapedectomy: Systematic Review.耳内镜下镫骨切除术的疗效:系统评价
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Feb 5;28(1):e165-e169. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1761171. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
Conventional Microscopic Stapedotomy: An Obsolete Technique or Still the Gold Standard for the Management of Otosclerosis?传统显微镜下镫骨切除术:一种过时的技术还是耳硬化症治疗的金标准?
Cureus. 2021 Mar 26;13(3):e14126. doi: 10.7759/cureus.14126.