• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《手术室黑匣子研究第一年分析》

First-year Analysis of the Operating Room Black Box Study.

机构信息

International Centre for Surgical Safety, Keenan Centre for Biomedical Science, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2020 Jan;271(1):122-127. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002863.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000002863
PMID:29916872
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To characterize intraoperative errors, events, and distractions, and measure technical skills of surgeons in minimally invasive surgery practice.

BACKGROUND

Adverse events in the operating room (OR) are common contributors of morbidity and mortality in surgical patients. Adverse events often occur due to deviations in performance and environmental factors. Although comprehensive intraoperative data analysis and transparent disclosure have been advocated to better understand how to improve surgical safety, they have rarely been done.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study in 132 consecutive patients undergoing elective laparoscopic general surgery at an academic hospital during the first year after the definite implementation of a multiport data capture system called the OR Black Box to identify intraoperative errors, events, and distractions. Expert analysts characterized intraoperative distractions, errors, and events, and measured trainee involvement as main operator. Technical skills were compared, crude and risk-adjusted, among the attending surgeon and trainees.

RESULTS

Auditory distractions occurred a median of 138 times per case [interquartile range (IQR) 96-190]. At least 1 cognitive distraction appeared in 84 cases (64%). Medians of 20 errors (IQR 14-36) and 8 events (IQR 4-12) were identified per case. Both errors and events occurred often in dissection and reconstruction phases of operation. Technical skills of residents were lower than those of the attending surgeon (P = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

During elective laparoscopic operations, frequent intraoperative errors and events, variation in surgeons' technical skills, and a high amount of environmental distractions were identified using the OR Black Box.

摘要

目的

描述微创手术实践中的术中错误、事件和干扰,并测量外科医生的技术技能。

背景

手术室(OR)中的不良事件是外科患者发病率和死亡率的常见原因。不良事件通常是由于操作和环境因素的偏差引起的。尽管全面的术中数据分析和透明披露已被提倡用于更好地了解如何提高手术安全性,但很少这样做。

方法

我们在一家学术医院进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,在该医院实施名为 OR 黑盒的多端口数据采集系统后的第一年,对 132 例接受择期腹腔镜普外科手术的连续患者进行了研究,以识别术中错误、事件和干扰。专家分析员对术中干扰、错误和事件进行了特征描述,并将学员作为主要操作者参与度进行了测量。对主治医生和学员的技术技能进行了比较,包括原始数据和风险调整数据。

结果

听觉干扰中位数为每例 138 次[四分位距(IQR)96-190]。84 例(64%)至少出现 1 次认知干扰。每例错误中位数为 20 次(IQR 14-36),事件中位数为 8 次(IQR 4-12)。错误和事件在手术的解剖和重建阶段经常发生。住院医师的技术技能低于主治医生(P=0.015)。

结论

使用 OR 黑盒,在择期腹腔镜手术中,识别出频繁的术中错误和事件、外科医生技术技能的差异以及大量的环境干扰。

相似文献

1
First-year Analysis of the Operating Room Black Box Study.《手术室黑匣子研究第一年分析》
Ann Surg. 2020 Jan;271(1):122-127. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002863.
2
Factors associated with surgeon's perception of distraction in the operating room.与外科医生在手术室中对分散注意力的感知相关的因素。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jul;34(7):3169-3175. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07088-z. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
3
The effect of intraoperative distractions on severe technical events in laparoscopic bariatric surgery.术中干扰对腹腔镜减重手术中严重技术事件的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Aug;35(8):4569-4580. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07878-w. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
4
Utilizing the Operating Room Black Box to Characterize Intraoperative Delays, Distractions, and Threats in the Gynecology Operating Room: A Pilot Study.利用手术室黑匣子来描述妇科手术室中的术中延误、干扰和威胁:一项试点研究。
Cureus. 2021 Jul 6;13(7):e16218. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16218. eCollection 2021 Jul.
5
Patient Safety in the Operating Room During Urologic Surgery: The OR Black Box Experience.泌尿科手术中手术室的患者安全:OR 黑盒体验。
World J Surg. 2021 Nov;45(11):3306-3312. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06251-9. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
6
Non-technical skills and device-related interruptions in minimally invasive surgery.微创外科中的非技术技能和与设备相关的中断。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Aug;35(8):4494-4500. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07962-1. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
7
Impaired laparoscopic performance of novice surgeons due to phone call distraction: a single-centre, prospective study.新手外科医生因电话分心而导致腹腔镜操作能力受损:一项单中心前瞻性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec;31(12):5312-5317. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5609-7. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
8
Relationship between intraoperative non-technical performance and technical events in bariatric surgery.肥胖症手术中手术非技术表现与技术事件之间的关系。
Br J Surg. 2018 Jul;105(8):1044-1050. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10811. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
9
Implementation and validation of a retroperitoneal dissection curriculum.腹膜后解剖课程的实施与验证。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Oct;219(4):395.e1-395.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.06.021. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
10
The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.手术医生手术量对大子宫行微创子宫切除术的围手术期不良事件的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov;219(5):490.e1-490.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Sep 14.

引用本文的文献

1
[Multimodal data processing through AI: envisioning the operating room of the future].[通过人工智能进行多模态数据处理:展望未来手术室]
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2025 Sep 12. doi: 10.1007/s00104-025-02377-x.
2
Enhancing Surgical Safety and Efficiency: Systematic Review and Single-Arm Meta-Analysis of Surgical Data Recorders.提高手术安全性和效率:手术数据记录器的系统评价和单臂荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 28;27:e72703. doi: 10.2196/72703.
3
The contribution of surgical data science to identifying intraoperative human errors and adverse events in elective liver surgery: A preliminary study.
手术数据科学在识别择期肝脏手术术中人为失误和不良事件中的作用:一项初步研究。
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2025 Aug 31;29(3):279-285. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.25-089. Epub 2025 Jul 24.
4
Does the Surgical Safety Checklist need a co-pilot? Comparing adherence in gynecological surgery through electronic medical records and OR Black Box video observations.手术安全核对表需要副驾驶吗?通过电子病历和手术室黑匣子视频观察比较妇科手术中的依从性。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jul 17. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11966-0.
5
Balancing Ethics and Innovation: Can Artificial Intelligence Safely Transform Emergency Surgery? A Narrative Perspective.平衡伦理与创新:人工智能能否安全变革急诊外科?叙事视角
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 30;14(9):3111. doi: 10.3390/jcm14093111.
6
Can surgeons trust AI? Perspectives on machine learning in surgery and the importance of eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI).外科医生能信任人工智能吗?关于外科手术中机器学习的观点以及可解释人工智能(XAI)的重要性。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Jan 28;410(1):53. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03626-7.
7
MUTUAL: Towards Holistic Sensing and Inference in the Operating Room.MUTUAL:迈向手术室中的整体感知与推理
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2025 Jan 17:178-188. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-77610-6_17.
8
Artificial Intelligence in Cardiac Surgery: Transforming Outcomes and Shaping the Future.心脏外科手术中的人工智能:改变手术结果,塑造未来。
Clin Pract. 2025 Jan 14;15(1):17. doi: 10.3390/clinpract15010017.
9
The Obesity Paradox Revisited: Is Obesity Still a Protective Factor for Patients With High Comorbidity Burden or High-Complexity Procedures?再探肥胖悖论:肥胖对于高合并症负担或高复杂性手术患者而言仍是一个保护因素吗?
Ann Surg Open. 2024 Dec 17;5(4):e531. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000531. eCollection 2024 Dec.
10
Machine learning perioperative applications in visceral surgery: a narrative review.机器学习在内脏外科围手术期的应用:一项叙述性综述。
Front Surg. 2024 Oct 30;11:1493779. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1493779. eCollection 2024.