Department of Neurology, Xuzhou First Peoples Hospital, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, PR China.
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2018 May-Jun;32(3):719-723.
The purpose of this investigation was to compare the efficacy of automatic to manual reposition treatment for patients with horizontal semicircular canal paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV). Sixty patients diagnosed with BPPV were equally and randomly divided into either a manual reposition treatment group or an automatic reposition treatment group. The groups were compared regarding difference in pain [visual analog scale (VAS)], extent of vertigo disorder [dizziness handicap inventory (DHI)], quality of life (SF-36), and therapeutic effect. Improved VAS, DHI and SF-36 were observed in both groups, however the efficacious rate of the automatic reposition group (96.7%) was 13.4% higher than that of the manual reposition group, reaching a statistical significance (p less than 0.05). In conclusion, in the treatment of BPPV patients, automatic reposition is more effective than manual reposition and can improve the patients quality of life.
本研究旨在比较自动复位治疗与手动复位治疗水平半规管阵发性位置性眩晕(BPPV)患者的疗效。60 例 BPPV 患者被平均随机分为手动复位治疗组和自动复位治疗组。比较两组疼痛差异[视觉模拟评分(VAS)]、眩晕障碍程度[眩晕残障量表(DHI)]、生活质量(SF-36)和治疗效果。两组 VAS、DHI 和 SF-36 均有改善,但自动复位组(96.7%)的有效率比手动复位组高 13.4%,差异有统计学意义(p 小于 0.05)。结论:在 BPPV 患者的治疗中,自动复位比手动复位更有效,可以提高患者的生活质量。