Zhang Wenjie, Amos Tony B, Gutkin Stephen W, Lodowski Nicole, Giegerich Emma, Joshi Kruti
WG US Advanced Health Analytics (WG AHA), Stamford, CT, USA.
Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA.
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2018 Jun 8;10:309-320. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S156308. eCollection 2018.
The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic literature review on the burden of schizophrenia in privately insured US patients.
A systematic literature review of English language peer-reviewed journal articles of observational studies published from 2006 to 2016 was conducted using EMBASE/MEDLINE databases. Abstracts covering substantial numbers of patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (i.e., N ≥ 100) were included for full-text review. Articles that did not clearly specify private insurance types were excluded.
A total of 25 studies were reviewed; 10 included only privately insured patients; and 15 included a mix of different types of insurance. The review of the clinical burden of schizophrenia revealed the following: compared to patients with no mental disorders, those with schizophrenia had significantly increased odds of systemic disorders and both alcohol and substance abuse. Antipsychotic (AP) adherence was low, ranging from 31.5% to 68.7%. The medication possession ratio for AP adherence ranged from 0.22 to 0.73. The review of the health economic burden of schizophrenia revealed the following: patients with a recent (vs. chronic) diagnosis of schizophrenia had significantly higher frequencies of emergency department visits and hospitalizations and greater length of stay (LOS) and total annual per-capita costs. Mean all-cause hospitalizations and LOS decreased significantly after (vs. before) initiating long-acting injectable APs (LAIs). Patients also had significantly decreased mean all-cause, and schizophrenia-related, hospitalization costs after initiating LAIs. Total direct per-capita costs of care (but not pharmacy costs) for patients who were nonadherent to their oral APs within the first 90 days of their index event were significantly higher (vs. early adherent patients). Despite these potential benefits, only 0.25%-13.1% of patients were treated with LAIs across all studies.
Privately insured US patients with schizophrenia experience a substantial clinical and health economic burden related to comorbidities, acute care needs, nonadherence, and polypharmacy and have relatively low use of LAIs. Further study is warranted to understand prescribing patterns and clinical policies related to this patient population.
本研究旨在对美国私人保险患者中精神分裂症的负担进行系统的文献综述。
使用EMBASE/MEDLINE数据库对2006年至2016年发表的英文同行评审期刊上的观察性研究文章进行系统的文献综述。纳入大量精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍患者(即N≥100)的摘要进行全文评审。未明确说明私人保险类型的文章被排除。
共审查了25项研究;10项仅纳入了私人保险患者;15项纳入了不同类型保险的混合样本。精神分裂症临床负担的综述显示如下:与无精神障碍的患者相比,精神分裂症患者出现全身性疾病以及酒精和药物滥用的几率显著增加。抗精神病药物(AP)的依从性较低,范围从31.5%至68.7%。AP依从性的药物持有率范围为0.22至0.73。精神分裂症健康经济负担的综述显示如下:近期(与慢性)诊断为精神分裂症的患者急诊就诊和住院的频率显著更高,住院时间(LOS)更长,年度人均总成本更高。开始使用长效注射用AP(LAIs)后(与之前相比),全因住院和LOS显著降低。开始使用LAIs后,患者的全因及与精神分裂症相关的住院费用也显著降低。在索引事件的前90天内未坚持口服AP的患者的人均直接护理总成本(但不包括药房成本)显著高于(与早期依从患者相比)。尽管有这些潜在益处,但在所有研究中,仅0.25% - 13.1%的患者接受了LAIs治疗。
美国有私人保险的精神分裂症患者因合并症、急性护理需求、不依从和多药联合治疗而承受着巨大的临床和健康经济负担,且LAIs的使用相对较少。有必要进一步研究以了解与该患者群体相关的处方模式和临床政策。