Farr Sebastian, Guitton Thierry G, Ring David
Department of Pediatric Orthopaedics and Adult Foot and Ankle Surgery, Orthopaedic Hospital Speising, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
J Wrist Surg. 2018 Jul;7(3):227-231. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1612636. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
Patients with Madelung deformity exhibit a spectrum of mild to severe deformity and distortion of wrist geometry. It may be difficult to reliably distinguish mild Madelung deformity from normal. This study thus tested the reliability of the diagnosis of mild Madelung deformity on a single posteroanterior (PA) radiograph. An online survey was sent to hand and wrist surgeons of the Science of Variation Study Group for evaluation of 25 PA wrist radiographs comprising five adults with suspected mild Madelung deformity and 20 radiographs without any evident wrist pathology. Interobserver agreement was evaluated both via average percent agreement and Fleiss' kappa. To evaluate the relationship of rater characteristics and accuracy, a linear regression model was computed. The interobserver agreement among the 69 participating surgeons was low ( = 0.12). The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 0.30, 0.86, and 0.75, respectively. The mean confidence was 7.4 ± 0.4 for mild Madelung and 7.8 ± 0.5 for normal ( = 0.112). The observers' confidence level was the only factor which had a mild but significant effect on the accuracy of the ratings. The diagnosis of mild Madelung deformity on a single PA radiograph is unreliable. The level of evidence is II, diagnostic study.
马德隆畸形患者表现出从轻度到重度的一系列畸形以及腕部几何形状的扭曲。可能难以可靠地将轻度马德隆畸形与正常情况区分开来。因此,本研究测试了仅根据一张后前位(PA)X线片诊断轻度马德隆畸形的可靠性。向变异科学研究组的手和腕部外科医生发送了一项在线调查,以评估25张腕部PA X线片,其中包括5名疑似轻度马德隆畸形的成年人的X线片和20张无任何明显腕部病变的X线片。通过平均一致百分比和弗莱iss卡方检验评估观察者间的一致性。为了评估评估者特征与准确性之间的关系,计算了线性回归模型。69名参与研究的外科医生之间的观察者间一致性较低(κ = 0.12)。总体敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为0.30、0.86和0.75。轻度马德隆畸形的平均置信度为7.4±0.4,正常情况为7.8±0.5(P = 0.112)。观察者的置信水平是对评级准确性有轻微但显著影响的唯一因素。仅根据一张PA X线片诊断轻度马德隆畸形并不可靠。证据等级为II级,诊断性研究。