Kootstra Thomas J M, van Leeuwen Wouter F, Chen Neal, Ring David
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
J Wrist Surg. 2018 Jul;7(3):243-246. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1625953. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
There is controversy regarding the value of repair of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC). Given that an acute tear of the TFCC associated with a displaced distal radius fracture uncommonly benefits from repair, the role of repair in other settings is uncertain. Our impression is that TFCC repair is highly variable from surgeon-to-surgeon. The purpose of this study is to determine the rate of TFCC repair in patients who had a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan of the wrist obtained for ulnar-sided wrist pain, and that showed signal changes in the TFCC. We tested the primary null hypothesis that there are no demographic or surgeon factors associated with repair of the TFCC. Three hundred and ninety-four patients with ulnar-sided wrist pain and an MRI scan showing changes in the TFCC were included in this retrospective study. No patients had instability of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) recorded in the medical record. Surgical repair of TFCC tears was used as the primary outcome during statistical analysis to identify factors associated with repair. Out of 394 (6%), 25 patients underwent TFCC repair. We found that 10% of the treating surgeons (4 out of 41) performed 80% of the procedures (20 out of 25). Patients who discerned a trauma prior to their symptoms and patients whose MRI showed signal changes primarily in the ulnar portion of the TFCC were more likely to have surgical repair. We found that the rate of TFCC repair varies substantially from surgeon-to-surgeon. The observation that repair is more likely to happen when patients perceive themselves as injured suggests that perception of injury affects how patients and surgeons consider treatment options. To help avoid surgeries based on surgeon bias or patient misperception, we suggest studying the effect of tools that provide simple, balanced, dispassionate, and empowering information (e.g., decision aids) that can limit surgeon-to-surgeon variation. Level IV.
关于三角纤维软骨复合体(TFCC)修复的价值存在争议。鉴于与桡骨远端移位骨折相关的TFCC急性撕裂很少能从修复中获益,修复在其他情况下的作用尚不确定。我们的印象是,TFCC修复在不同外科医生之间差异很大。 本研究的目的是确定因尺侧腕部疼痛而进行腕部磁共振成像(MRI)扫描且显示TFCC有信号改变的患者中TFCC修复的发生率。我们检验了主要的零假设,即不存在与TFCC修复相关的人口统计学或外科医生因素。 本回顾性研究纳入了394例因尺侧腕部疼痛且MRI扫描显示TFCC有改变的患者。病历中未记录有桡尺远侧关节(DRUJ)不稳定的患者。在统计分析中,将TFCC撕裂的手术修复作为主要结局以确定与修复相关的因素。 在394例患者中(6%),25例患者接受了TFCC修复。我们发现,10%的主刀医生(41名中的4名)实施了80%的手术(25例中的20例)。在症状出现前有明确外伤史的患者以及MRI显示信号改变主要位于TFCC尺侧部分的患者更有可能接受手术修复。 我们发现,TFCC修复率在不同外科医生之间差异很大。当患者认为自己受伤时修复更有可能发生这一观察结果表明,损伤的认知会影响患者和外科医生对治疗方案的考虑。为了避免基于外科医生偏见或患者错误认知的手术,我们建议研究提供简单、平衡、客观且能增强信心的信息的工具(如决策辅助工具)的效果,这些工具可以减少外科医生之间的差异。 四级。