Corn M, Breysse P, Hall T, Chen G, Risby T, Swift D L
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1985 Jan;46(1):4-8. doi: 10.1080/15298668591394284.
The literature in selected technical subject areas related to the Mine Safety and Health Administration's (MSHA) respirable mine dust control policy was critically reviewed. Specific topics included: (1) the technical aspects of respirable dust sampling, (2) the development of a sampling strategy and (3) currently used analytical techniques for free silica content of respirable coal mine dust. The 2.0 Lpm MSHA respirable dust sampling flow rate does not conform with published results which indicate that to simulate existing pulmonary particle deposition models, the sampling flow rate should range from 1.4 to 1.7 Lpm. MSHA's sampling strategy focuses on controlling respirable coal mine dust with both area and personal samples of workers in selected occupations or activities. Many uncertainties are encountered as area samples are used to estimate personal exposures. Although all of the analytical methods for crystalline free silica are sufficiently sensitive to be able to detect and quantitate free silica at environmentally significant concentrations, they are all plagued with similar difficulties. Analytical standards representing the various forms of silica are not available. Available analytical methods do not differentiate among polymorphs of silica. Recommendations are presented to resolve identified problem areas.
对与美国矿山安全与健康管理局(MSHA)的可吸入矿井粉尘控制政策相关的特定技术领域文献进行了严格审查。具体主题包括:(1)可吸入粉尘采样的技术方面;(2)采样策略的制定;(3)目前用于分析可吸入煤矿粉尘中游离二氧化硅含量的技术。MSHA的2.0Lpm可吸入粉尘采样流速与已发表的结果不一致,这些结果表明,为了模拟现有的肺部颗粒沉积模型,采样流速应在1.4至1.7Lpm之间。MSHA的采样策略侧重于通过对选定职业或活动中的工人进行区域和个人采样来控制可吸入煤矿粉尘。在使用区域样本估计个人接触量时会遇到许多不确定性。尽管所有用于结晶游离二氧化硅的分析方法都足够灵敏,能够检测和定量环境中具有显著浓度的游离二氧化硅,但它们都存在类似的困难。代表各种二氧化硅形式的分析标准不可用。现有的分析方法无法区分二氧化硅的多晶型物。针对已确定的问题领域提出了建议。