Ruf Sabine, Bock Niko C
Department of Orthodontics, University of Giessen, Germany.
Eur J Orthod. 2019 Mar 29;41(2):172-179. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjy040.
The aetiology of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) is controversial and post-orthodontic long-term TMD data of Class II populations are scarce.
To analyse the long-term (≥15 years) effects of Herbst-multibracket appliances (MBA) Class II treatment (Tx) on signs and symptoms of TMD.
All patients (University of Giessen, Germany) who underwent Herbst-MBA Tx (end of active Tx ≥ 15 years ago), could be located and agreed to participate in a recall. Available records from before (T0) and after (T1) active Tx were used for comparison with the recall data (T2). All findings were classified according to research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (RDC/TMD) and diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) as well as the Helkimo index.
Seventy-two out of 152 patients participated at age 33.7 ± 3.0 years. Complete TMD data-sets (T0 + T1 + T2) were available for 33 participants. Participants and non-participants did not differ significantly at T0 or T1 in terms of general clinical data, occlusal relationship or TMD prevalence. At all time-points, 79-91 per cent of the patients were free of TMD signs and symptoms (RDC/TMD and DC/TMD). The TMD prevalence fluctuated: 21 per cent (T0), 9 per cent (T1), 15 per cent (T2). Similar findings with a trend towards improvement during T0-T1 and recurrence during T1-T2 were seen for the Helkimo index. There were no statistically significant differences.
The participation rate of only 62 per cent, the disparate availability of records (T0, T1), the fact that the patients were not treated at exactly the same time period and that no untreated control group is available.
In the long-term (≥15 years) Herbst-MBA Class II Tx neither seems to increase nor decrease the risk for developing TMD.
颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)的病因存在争议,且关于安氏II类人群正畸治疗后长期TMD的数据稀缺。
分析Herbst多托槽矫治器(MBA)对安氏II类错颌畸形的长期(≥15年)治疗效果及TMD的体征和症状。
所有曾接受Herbst-MBA治疗(主动治疗结束≥15年前)的患者(德国吉森大学),能够被找到并同意参与回访。治疗前(T0)和治疗后(T1)的可用记录与回访数据(T2)进行比较。所有结果均根据颞下颌关节紊乱病研究诊断标准(RDC/TMD)、颞下颌关节紊乱病诊断标准(DC/TMD)以及Helkimo指数进行分类。
152例患者中有72例在33.7±3.0岁时参与回访。33名参与者拥有完整的TMD数据集(T0+T1+T2)。参与者与未参与者在T0或T1时的一般临床数据、咬合关系或TMD患病率方面无显著差异。在所有时间点,79%-至91%的患者无TMD体征和症状(RDC/TMD和DC/TMD)。TMD患病率波动:21%(T0)、9%(T1)、15%(T2)。Helkimo指数也有类似结果,在T0-T1期间有改善趋势,在T1-T2期间有复发趋势。但均无统计学显著差异。
参与率仅为62%,记录的可获得性存在差异(T0、T1),患者并非在同一时间段接受治疗,且没有未治疗的对照组。
长期(≥15年)来看,Herbst-MBA安氏II类错颌畸形治疗似乎既不会增加也不会降低患TMD的风险。