Suppr超能文献

乌干达西南部接触野生动物人群中疑似埃博拉病毒暴露。

Suspected Exposure to Filoviruses Among People Contacting Wildlife in Southwestern Uganda.

机构信息

One Health Institute, School of Veterinary Medicine.

Bwindi Community Hospital, Buhoma, Uganda.

出版信息

J Infect Dis. 2018 Nov 22;218(suppl_5):S277-S286. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiy251.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Human and filovirus host interactions remain poorly understood in areas where Ebola hemorrhagic fever outbreaks are likely to occur. In the Bwindi region of Uganda, a hot spot of mammalian biodiversity in Africa, human livelihoods are intimately connected with wildlife, creating potential for exposure to filoviruses.

METHODS

We tested samples from 331 febrile patients presenting to healthcare facilities near Bwindi Impenetrable Forest, Uganda, by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis and Western blot, using recombinant glycoprotein antigens for Ebola virus (EBOV), Sudan virus (SUDV), Bundibugyo virus (BDBV), and Marburg virus. Behavioral data on contact with wildlife were collected to examine risk factors for filovirus seropositivity.

RESULTS

All patients were negative for active filovirus infection, by PCR analysis. However, patients were seroreactive to SUDV (4.7%), EBOV (5.3%), and BDBV (8.9%), indicating previous exposure. Touching duikers was the most significant risk factor associated with EBOV seropositivity, while hunting primates and touching and/or eating cane rats were significant risk factors for SUDV seropositivity.

CONCLUSIONS

People in southwestern Uganda have suspected previous exposure to filoviruses, particularly those with a history of wildlife contact. Circulation of filoviruses in wild animals and subsequent spillover into humans could be more common than previously reported.

摘要

背景

在埃博拉出血热疫情可能发生的地区,人类与丝状病毒宿主的相互作用仍知之甚少。在乌干达布温迪难以穿越的森林附近的布温迪地区,是非洲哺乳动物生物多样性的热点地区,人类的生计与野生动物密切相关,这为接触丝状病毒创造了潜在的可能性。

方法

我们通过聚合酶链反应(PCR)分析和 Western blot 测试了来自 331 名发热患者的样本,这些患者在乌干达布温迪难以穿越的森林附近的医疗机构就诊,使用重组糖蛋白抗原进行埃博拉病毒(EBOV)、苏丹病毒(SUDV)、邦迪布尤病毒(BDBV)和马尔堡病毒的检测。收集与野生动物接触的行为数据,以研究丝状病毒血清阳性的危险因素。

结果

所有患者的 PCR 分析均为活动性丝状病毒感染阴性。然而,患者对 SUDV(4.7%)、EBOV(5.3%)和 BDBV(8.9%)呈血清反应性,表明以前有过接触。触摸中小麂是与 EBOV 血清阳性相关的最显著危险因素,而猎捕灵长类动物、触摸和/或食用刺豚鼠是 SUDV 血清阳性的显著危险因素。

结论

乌干达西南部的人们疑似以前曾接触过丝状病毒,尤其是有野生动物接触史的人。野生动物中丝状病毒的传播及其随后溢出到人类中的情况可能比之前报道的更为普遍。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

9
A new threat from an old enemy: Re‑emergence of coronavirus (Review).旧敌新威胁:冠状病毒再现(综述)。
Int J Mol Med. 2020 Jun;45(6):1631-1643. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2020.4555. Epub 2020 Mar 27.

本文引用的文献

6
Ebola virus antibodies in fruit bats, bangladesh.孟加拉果蝠中的埃博拉病毒抗体。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2013 Feb;19(2):270-3. doi: 10.3201/eid1902.120524.
7
Ebola virus outbreaks in Africa: past and present.非洲的埃博拉病毒疫情:过去与现在
Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 2012 Jun 20;79(2):451. doi: 10.4102/ojvr.v79i2.451.
8
Reemerging Sudan Ebola virus disease in Uganda, 2011.2011 年乌干达再现苏丹埃博拉病毒病。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2012 Sep;18(9):1480-3. doi: 10.3201/eid1809.111536.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验