• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于指南的阶梯式和协作式护理在一项集群随机试验中对抑郁症患者的效果。

Guideline-based stepped and collaborative care for patients with depression in a cluster-randomised trial.

机构信息

Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy Research, Institute of Psychology, University of Zurich, Binzmühlestrasse 14/16, CH-8050, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 20;8(1):9389. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27470-6.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-27470-6
PMID:29925893
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6010425/
Abstract

Guidelines recommend stepped and collaborative care models (SCM) for depression. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a complex guideline-based SCM for depressed patients. German primary care units were cluster-randomised into intervention (IG) or control group (CG) (3:1 ratio). Adult routine care patients with PHQ-9 ≥ 5 points could participate and received SCM in IG and treatment as usual (TAU) in CG. Primary outcome was change in PHQ-9 from baseline to 12 months (hypothesis: greater reduction in IG). A linear mixed model was calculated with group as fixed effect and practice as random effect, controlling for baseline PHQ-9 (intention-to-treat). 36 primary care units were randomised to IG and 13 to CG. 36 psychotherapists, 6 psychiatrists and 7 clinics participated in SCM. 737 patients were included (IG: n = 569 vs. CG: n = 168); data were available for 60% (IG) and 64% (CG) after 12 months. IG showed 2.4 points greater reduction [95% confidence interval (CI): -3.4 to -1.5, p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 0.45] (adjusted PHQ-9 mean change). Odds of response [odds ratio: 2.8; 95% CI: 1.6 to 4.7] and remission [odds ratio: 3.2; 95% CI: 1.58 to 6.26] were higher in IG. Guideline-based SCM can improve depression care.

摘要

指南推荐采用递进式和协作式护理模式(SCM)来治疗抑郁症。我们旨在评估一种基于复杂指南的 SCM 对抑郁患者的有效性。德国初级保健单位以 3:1 的比例被随机分为干预组(IG)或对照组(CG)。成年常规护理患者 PHQ-9≥5 分可参加研究,IG 组接受 SCM,CG 组接受常规治疗(TAU)。主要结局是 PHQ-9 从基线到 12 个月的变化(假设:IG 组的降幅更大)。采用线性混合模型进行计算,组为固定效应,实践为随机效应,控制基线 PHQ-9(意向治疗)。36 个初级保健单位被随机分配到 IG 组和 CG 组。36 名心理治疗师、6 名精神科医生和 7 个诊所参与了 SCM。共纳入 737 名患者(IG:n=569 与 CG:n=168);12 个月后,IG 组有 60%(n=341)和 CG 组有 64%(n=107)的数据可用。IG 组的 PHQ-9 评分降低了 2.4 分[95%置信区间(CI):-3.4 至-1.5,p<0.001;Cohen's d=0.45](调整后的 PHQ-9 平均变化)。IG 组的反应[比值比:2.8;95%CI:1.6 至 4.7]和缓解[比值比:3.2;95%CI:1.58 至 6.26]的几率更高。基于指南的 SCM 可以改善抑郁护理。

相似文献

1
Guideline-based stepped and collaborative care for patients with depression in a cluster-randomised trial.基于指南的阶梯式和协作式护理在一项集群随机试验中对抑郁症患者的效果。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 20;8(1):9389. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27470-6.
2
Collaborative nurse-led self-management support for primary care patients with anxiety, depressive or somatic symptoms: Cluster-randomised controlled trial (findings of the SMADS study).协作式护士主导的初级保健患者焦虑、抑郁或躯体症状的自我管理支持:集群随机对照试验(SMADS 研究结果)。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Nov;63:101-111. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.08.007. Epub 2016 Aug 21.
3
Cost-effectiveness of guideline-based stepped and collaborative care versus treatment as usual for patients with depression - a cluster-randomized trial.基于指南的阶梯式和协作护理与常规治疗相比对抑郁症患者的成本效益 - 一项集群随机试验。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Aug 28;20(1):427. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02829-0.
4
Effect of a stepped-care intervention delivered by lay health workers on major depressive disorder among primary care patients in Nigeria (STEPCARE): a cluster-randomised controlled trial.基层卫生工作者实施的分级护理干预对尼日利亚初级保健患者中重度抑郁症的影响(STEPCARE):一项集群随机对照试验。
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Jul;7(7):e951-e960. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30148-2. Epub 2019 May 13.
5
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a guideline-based stepped care model for patients with depression: study protocol of a cluster-randomized controlled trial in routine care.基于指南的抑郁症患者逐步护理模式的有效性和成本效益:一项常规护理中整群随机对照试验的研究方案
BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Aug 20;14:230. doi: 10.1186/s12888-014-0230-y.
6
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of collaborative care for depression in UK primary care (CADET): a cluster randomised controlled trial.英国初级保健中抑郁症协作护理的临床疗效和成本效益(CADET):一项整群随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Feb;20(14):1-192. doi: 10.3310/hta20140.
7
Collaborative treatment of late-life depression in primary care (GermanIMPACT): study protocol of a cluster-randomized controlled trial.初级保健中晚期抑郁症的联合治疗(GermanIMPACT):一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2014 Sep 6;15:351. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-351.
8
Behavioural activation therapy for post-stroke depression: the BEADS feasibility RCT.行为激活疗法治疗脑卒中后抑郁:BEADS 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Sep;23(47):1-176. doi: 10.3310/hta23470.
9
Depression care management for adults older than 60 years in primary care clinics in urban China: a cluster-randomised trial.中国城市基层医疗诊所中60岁以上成年人的抑郁症护理管理:一项整群随机试验。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2015 Apr;2(4):332-9. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00002-4. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
10
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness for the treatment of depressive symptoms in refugees and asylum seekers: A multi-centred randomized controlled trial.治疗难民和寻求庇护者抑郁症状的有效性和成本效益:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022 Jun 6;19:100413. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100413. eCollection 2022 Aug.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond the medical file: A scoping review on patients' perspectives on depression treatment in primary care.超越医疗档案:关于患者对初级保健中抑郁症治疗看法的范围综述
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 5;20(6):e0293713. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293713. eCollection 2025.
2
Integrating psychiatry and family medicine in the management of somatic symptom disorders: Diagnosis, collaboration, and communication strategies.在躯体症状障碍管理中整合精神病学与家庭医学:诊断、协作及沟通策略
J Gen Fam Med. 2024 Oct 28;26(1):12-18. doi: 10.1002/jgf2.725. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
A Qualitative Investigation of Characteristics Impacting Clinical Decision-Making in Integrated Behavioral Health Care.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment selection and treatment initialization in guideline-based stepped and collaborative care for depression.基于指南的分级和协作式护理治疗抑郁症中的治疗选择和治疗启动。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 26;13(12):e0208882. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208882. eCollection 2018.
2
Collaborative nurse-led self-management support for primary care patients with anxiety, depressive or somatic symptoms: Cluster-randomised controlled trial (findings of the SMADS study).协作式护士主导的初级保健患者焦虑、抑郁或躯体症状的自我管理支持:集群随机对照试验(SMADS 研究结果)。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Nov;63:101-111. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.08.007. Epub 2016 Aug 21.
3
一项定性研究:综合性行为医疗保健中影响临床决策的特征要素。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct;51(4):561-587. doi: 10.1007/s11414-024-09891-6. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
4
Effectiveness of a coordinated ambulatory care program for patients with mental disorders or multiple sclerosis: results of a prospective non-randomized controlled trial in South Germany.针对精神障碍或多发性硬化症患者的协同门诊护理项目的有效性:德国南部一项前瞻性非随机对照试验的结果
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Dec 19;14:1183710. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1183710. eCollection 2023.
5
A framework for precision "dosing" of mental healthcare services: algorithm development and clinical pilot.精神卫生保健服务精准“剂量”框架:算法开发与临床试点
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2023 Jul 5;17(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13033-023-00581-y.
6
Transitioning patients from outpatient mental health services to primary care: A rapid literature review.将患者从门诊心理健康服务过渡到初级保健:一项快速文献综述。
Implement Res Pract. 2021 Sep 14;2:26334895211041294. doi: 10.1177/26334895211041294. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
7
Smartphone-delivered mental health care interventions for refugees: A systematic review of the literature.针对难民的智能手机心理健康护理干预措施:文献系统综述
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2022 Dec 23;10:e6. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2022.61. eCollection 2023.
8
The Effects of Tai Chi on the Executive Functions and Physical Fitness in Middle-Aged Adults with Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial.太极拳对中年抑郁症患者执行功能和身体素质的影响:一项随机对照试验
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Sep 13;2022:1589106. doi: 10.1155/2022/1589106. eCollection 2022.
9
Mental health professionals' perspective on a brief transdiagnostic psychological intervention for Afghan asylum seekers and refugees.心理健康专业人士对一种简短的跨诊断心理干预措施的看法,该措施适用于阿富汗寻求庇护者和难民。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022 May 30;13(1):2068913. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2022.2068913. eCollection 2022.
10
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness for the treatment of depressive symptoms in refugees and asylum seekers: A multi-centred randomized controlled trial.治疗难民和寻求庇护者抑郁症状的有效性和成本效益:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022 Jun 6;19:100413. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100413. eCollection 2022 Aug.
[psychenet - The Hamburg Network for Mental Health: Evaluation of the Health Network Depression from the Perspective of Participating General Practitioners, Psychotherapists and Psychiatrists].
[心理网络 - 汉堡心理健康网络:从参与的全科医生、心理治疗师和精神科医生的角度对健康网络抑郁症进行评估]
Psychiatr Prax. 2015 Jul;42 Suppl 1:S54-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1387688. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
4
[Collaborative and stepped care for depression: Development of a model project within the Hamburg Network for Mental Health (psychenet.de)].[抑郁症的协作式和分级护理:汉堡精神健康网络(psychenet.de)内一个示范项目的开展]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2015 Apr;58(4-5):420-9. doi: 10.1007/s00103-015-2124-7.
5
The clinical effectiveness of stepped care systems for depression in working age adults: a systematic review.工作年龄段成年人抑郁的分级护理系统的临床效果:系统评价。
J Affect Disord. 2015 Jan 1;170:119-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.08.030. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
6
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a guideline-based stepped care model for patients with depression: study protocol of a cluster-randomized controlled trial in routine care.基于指南的抑郁症患者逐步护理模式的有效性和成本效益:一项常规护理中整群随机对照试验的研究方案
BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Aug 20;14:230. doi: 10.1186/s12888-014-0230-y.
7
Stepped care treatment delivery for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.抑郁症的阶梯式护理治疗:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Psychol Med. 2015 Jan;45(2):231-46. doi: 10.1017/S0033291714000701. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
8
Cost utility analysis of a collaborative stepped care intervention for panic and generalized anxiety disorders in primary care.基层医疗中针对惊恐障碍和广泛性焦虑障碍的协作式阶梯式照护干预的成本效用分析
J Psychosom Res. 2014 Jul;77(1):57-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.04.005. Epub 2014 Apr 26.
9
Collaborative care for depression and anxiety problems.抑郁症和焦虑症的协作护理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10(10):CD006525. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006525.pub2.
10
A target-driven collaborative care model for Major Depressive Disorder is effective in primary care in the Netherlands. A randomized clinical trial from the depression initiative.针对重度抑郁症的目标导向型协作式护理模式在荷兰初级保健中具有疗效。来自抑郁行动计划的一项随机临床试验。
J Affect Disord. 2013 Apr 25;146(3):328-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.09.015. Epub 2012 Oct 13.