• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症监护评估中的异稳态与镇静实践:一项观察性试点研究。

Allostasis and sedation practices in intensive care evaluation: an observational pilot study.

作者信息

Moore John P R, Anstey Chris, Murray Lauren, Fraser John F, Singer Mervyn

机构信息

Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Birtinya, QLD, 4575, Australia.

The School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, 288 Herston Road, Herston, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med Exp. 2018 Jun 20;6(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40635-018-0179-0.

DOI:10.1186/s40635-018-0179-0
PMID:29926288
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6010363/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A dysregulated stress response has been implicated in the pathogenesis of critical illness. Sedative agents utilised in the critically unwell patient may impact upon the stress response with a downstream negative effect on multiple organ systems. This study was designed to assess the feasibility of investigating components of the stress response as a sub-study of the current SPICE-III study (NCT01728558).

METHODS

This pilot observational cohort study was conducted in a single intensive care unit in Queensland, Australia. Enrolled patients were over 18 years who had been commenced on mechanical ventilation requiring sedation for less than 12 h but expected to remain ventilated for > 24 h. Blood samples were taken at 12 h intervals over a 5-day period commencing at the time of enrolment, and subsequently tested for various markers of key efferent limbs of the stress axis.

RESULTS

The 12 patients recruited closely mirrored the population within the pilot study used to design SPICE-III. Eighty-nine percent (107/120) of all planned blood samples were obtained and drawn within 0 h (0-0.3) of the planned sampling time point. Time from eligibility to enrolment was a median (IQR) 1.4 h (0.36-9.19), and time from eligibility to the first blood sample was 4.79 h (2.0-10.61). Physiological, hormonal, metabolic and cardiac biomarkers were consistent with an elevated stress response at baseline which mostly normalised over the 5-day study period. Plasma noradrenaline levels correlated with the dose of norepinephrine used.

CONCLUSIONS

A larger sub-study of the SPICE-III study is feasible. The study has demonstrated a predictable trend of variation of the components of the blood panel during the evolution of critical illness and supports multiple sampling time points for the follow-up study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ANZCTR.org.au , ACTRN12616001200471, Registered on 22 January 2016.

摘要

背景

应激反应失调与危重病的发病机制有关。用于危重症患者的镇静剂可能会影响应激反应,进而对多个器官系统产生下游负面影响。本研究旨在评估作为当前SPICE-III研究(NCT01728558)子研究调查应激反应组成部分的可行性。

方法

这项前瞻性观察性队列研究在澳大利亚昆士兰州的一个重症监护病房进行。入选患者年龄超过18岁,已开始机械通气且需要镇静少于12小时,但预计机械通气时间>24小时。从入组时开始,在5天内每隔12小时采集血样,随后检测应激轴关键传出支的各种标志物。

结果

招募的12名患者与用于设计SPICE-III的初步研究中的人群密切匹配。所有计划血样的89%(107/120)在计划采样时间点的0小时(0 - 0.3)内采集。从符合条件到入组的时间中位数(IQR)为1.4小时(0.36 - 9.19),从符合条件到采集第一份血样的时间为4.79小时(2.0 - 10.61)。生理、激素、代谢和心脏生物标志物在基线时与应激反应升高一致,在5天研究期间大多恢复正常。血浆去甲肾上腺素水平与使用的去甲肾上腺素剂量相关。

结论

对SPICE-III研究进行更大规模的子研究是可行的。该研究已证明在危重病发展过程中血液检测指标组成部分变化的可预测趋势,并支持后续研究采用多个采样时间点。

试验注册

ANZCTR.org.au,ACTRN12616001200471,于2016年1月22日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c6c/6010363/499cdbb17f4d/40635_2018_179_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c6c/6010363/6c00dbd62f43/40635_2018_179_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c6c/6010363/41bfe7fabf3f/40635_2018_179_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c6c/6010363/324755c3a5a0/40635_2018_179_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c6c/6010363/d38417df2fab/40635_2018_179_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c6c/6010363/de34b72e1078/40635_2018_179_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c6c/6010363/5fdc69cc100f/40635_2018_179_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c6c/6010363/499cdbb17f4d/40635_2018_179_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c6c/6010363/6c00dbd62f43/40635_2018_179_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c6c/6010363/41bfe7fabf3f/40635_2018_179_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c6c/6010363/324755c3a5a0/40635_2018_179_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c6c/6010363/d38417df2fab/40635_2018_179_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c6c/6010363/de34b72e1078/40635_2018_179_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c6c/6010363/5fdc69cc100f/40635_2018_179_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c6c/6010363/499cdbb17f4d/40635_2018_179_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Allostasis and sedation practices in intensive care evaluation: an observational pilot study.重症监护评估中的异稳态与镇静实践:一项观察性试点研究。
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2018 Jun 20;6(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40635-018-0179-0.
2
Clinical sedation scores as indicators of sedative and analgesic drug exposure in intensive care unit patients.临床镇静评分作为重症监护病房患者镇静和镇痛药物暴露的指标。
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2007 Sep;5(3):218-31. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2007.10.005.
3
The SPICE III study protocol and analysis plan: a randomised trial of early goaldirected sedation compared with standard care in mechanically ventilated patients.SPICE III研究方案与分析计划:一项针对机械通气患者的早期目标导向镇静与标准护理对比的随机试验。
Crit Care Resusc. 2017 Dec;19(4):318-326.
4
Reconsidering Dexmedetomidine for Sedation in the Critically Ill: Implications of the SPICE III Trial.重新考虑右美托咪定在危重症患者镇静中的应用:SPICE III 试验的影响。
Ann Pharmacother. 2020 May;54(5):504-508. doi: 10.1177/1060028019890672. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
5
A Non-Comparative Prospective Pilot Study of Ketamine for Sedation in Adult Septic Shock.氯胺酮用于成人感染性休克镇静的非对照前瞻性初步研究。
Mil Med. 2018 Nov 1;183(11-12):e409-e413. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy121.
6
Protocolized sedation vs usual care in pediatric patients mechanically ventilated for acute respiratory failure: a randomized clinical trial.程序化镇静与机械通气治疗急性呼吸衰竭患儿的常规护理比较:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2015 Jan 27;313(4):379-89. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.18399.
7
Impact of sedation and organ failure on continuous heart and respiratory rate variability monitoring in critically ill patients: a pilot study.镇静和器官衰竭对危重症患者连续心和呼吸率变异监测的影响:一项初步研究。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb;41(2):433-44. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31826a47de.
8
Methods in the design and implementation of the Randomized Evaluation of Sedation Titration for Respiratory Failure (RESTORE) clinical trial.呼吸衰竭镇静滴定随机评估(RESTORE)临床试验的设计与实施方法
Trials. 2018 Dec 17;19(1):687. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3075-8.
9
Effects of sedatives and opioids on trigger and cycling asynchronies throughout mechanical ventilation: an observational study in a large dataset from critically ill patients.镇静剂和阿片类药物对机械通气中触发和循环不同步的影响:一项来自危重病患者大型数据集的观察性研究。
Crit Care. 2019 Jul 5;23(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2531-5.
10
Randomized controlled trial of interrupted versus continuous sedative infusions in ventilated children.随机对照试验中断与连续镇静输注在通气儿童。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2012 Mar;13(2):131-5. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31820aba48.

引用本文的文献

1
Stress response during early sedation with dexmedetomidine compared with usual-care in ventilated critically ill patients.与常规护理相比,右美托咪定在机械通气危重症患者早期镇静期间的应激反应。
Crit Care. 2022 Nov 22;26(1):359. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04237-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Low HDL levels in sepsis versus trauma patients in intensive care unit.重症监护病房中脓毒症患者与创伤患者的高密度脂蛋白水平较低。
Ann Intensive Care. 2017 Dec;7(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s13613-017-0284-3. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
2
Early goal-directed sedation versus standard sedation in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: a pilot study*.早期目标导向镇静与机械通气危重症患者常规镇静的比较:一项初步研究*。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Aug;41(8):1983-91. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828a437d.
3
The stress response and critical illness: a review.应激反应与危重病:综述。
Crit Care Med. 2012 Dec;40(12):3283-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31826567eb.
4
Pharmacology of commonly used analgesics and sedatives in the ICU: benzodiazepines, propofol, and opioids.重症监护病房常用镇痛药和镇静药的药理学:苯二氮䓬类、丙泊酚和阿片类药物。
Anesthesiol Clin. 2011 Dec;29(4):567-85. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2011.09.001.
5
Protocolized intensive care unit management of analgesia, sedation, and delirium improves analgesia and subsyndromal delirium rates.规范化的重症加强护理病房镇痛、镇静和谵妄管理可提高镇痛和亚综合征性谵妄的发生率。
Anesth Analg. 2010 Aug;111(2):451-63. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181d7e1b8. Epub 2010 Apr 7.
6
A protocol of no sedation for critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation: a randomised trial.无镇静方案用于接受机械通气的危重症患者的研究方案:一项随机试验。
Lancet. 2010 Feb 6;375(9713):475-80. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62072-9. Epub 2010 Jan 29.
7
The pharmacology of oversedation in mechanically ventilated adults.机械通气成人过度镇静的药理学
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2008 Aug;14(4):403-7. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32830280b3.
8
Efficacy and safety of a paired sedation and ventilator weaning protocol for mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care (Awakening and Breathing Controlled trial): a randomised controlled trial.重症监护中机械通气患者配对镇静与撤机方案的疗效和安全性(唤醒与呼吸控制试验):一项随机对照试验
Lancet. 2008 Jan 12;371(9607):126-34. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60105-1.
9
Physiology and neurobiology of stress and adaptation: central role of the brain.压力与适应的生理学和神经生物学:大脑的核心作用。
Physiol Rev. 2007 Jul;87(3):873-904. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00041.2006.
10
Multiorgan failure is an adaptive, endocrine-mediated, metabolic response to overwhelming systemic inflammation.多器官功能衰竭是对严重全身性炎症的一种适应性、内分泌介导的代谢反应。
Lancet. 2004;364(9433):545-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16815-3.