对猿类和鸦科动物行为的平行过度解读。
Parallel overinterpretation of behavior of apes and corvids.
作者信息
Hampton Robert
机构信息
Emory University, Department of Psychology and Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
出版信息
Learn Behav. 2019 Jun;47(2):105-106. doi: 10.3758/s13420-018-0330-5.
Abstract
The report by Kabadayi and Osvath (Science, 357(6347), 202-204, 2017) does not demonstrate planning in ravens. The behavior of corvids and apes is fascinating and will be best appreciated through well-designed experiments that explicitly test alternative explanations and that are interpreted without unjustified anthropomorphic embellishment.
摘要
卡巴达伊和奥斯瓦特的报告（《科学》，357(6347)，202 - 204，2017年）并未证明乌鸦具有规划能力。鸦科动物和猿类的行为很有趣，通过精心设计的实验能得到最好的理解，这些实验要明确检验各种替代性解释，且在解释时不能有无根据的拟人化修饰。
相似文献
1
Parallel overinterpretation of behavior of apes and corvids.对猿类和鸦科动物行为的平行过度解读。
Learn Behav. 2019 Jun;47(2):105-106. doi: 10.3758/s13420-018-0330-5.
2
Ravens parallel great apes in flexible planning for tool-use and bartering.渡鸦在灵活规划工具使用和物物交换方面与类人猿相似。
Science. 2017 Jul 14;357(6347):202-204. doi: 10.1126/science.aam8138. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
3
Flexible Planning in Ravens?渡鸦是否具有灵活的规划能力？
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Nov;21(11):821-822. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
4
The mentality of crows: convergent evolution of intelligence in corvids and apes.乌鸦的思维：鸦科动物与猿类智力的趋同进化
Science. 2004 Dec 10;306(5703):1903-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1098410.
5
What can associative learning do for planning?联想学习对规划有什么作用？
R Soc Open Sci. 2018 Nov 28;5(11):180778. doi: 10.1098/rsos.180778. eCollection 2018 Nov.
6
Apes (Gorilla gorilla, Pan paniscus, P. troglodytes, Pongo abelii) versus corvids (Corvus corax, C. corone) in a support task: the effect of pattern and functionality.在一项支持任务中猿类（大猩猩、倭黑猩猩、黑猩猩、苏门答腊猩猩）与鸦科鸟类（渡鸦、小嘴乌鸦）的比较：图案和功能性的影响
J Comp Psychol. 2012 Nov;126(4):355-67. doi: 10.1037/a0028050. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
7
Ravens parallel great apes in physical and social cognitive skills.渡鸦在身体和社会认知技能方面与大猩猩不相上下。
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 10;10(1):20617. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77060-8.
8
Object caching in corvids: incidence and significance.鸦科动物的物体缓存行为：发生率及意义
Behav Processes. 2014 Feb;102:25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.12.003. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
9
Ravens, New Caledonian crows and jackdaws parallel great apes in motor self-regulation despite smaller brains.尽管大脑较小，渡鸦、新喀鸦和寒鸦在运动自我调节方面与大型猿类相似。
R Soc Open Sci. 2016 Apr 20;3(4):160104. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160104. eCollection 2016 Apr.
10
Ravens attribute visual access to unseen competitors.渡鸦将视觉获取归因于看不见的竞争对手。
Nat Commun. 2016 Feb 2;7:10506. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10506.
引用本文的文献
1
Sequences and animal intelligence.序列与动物智力。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 Jun 26;380(1929):20240116. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2024.0116.
2
Mental time travel in animals: the 'when' of mental time travel.动物的心理时间旅行：心理时间旅行的“何时”。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Nov 4;379(1913):20230398. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0398. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
3
A test of memory for stimulus sequences in great apes.猿类刺激序列记忆测试。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 6;18(9):e0290546. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290546. eCollection 2023.
4
Recent developments in parrot cognition: a quadrennial update.最近鹦鹉认知能力的发展：四年一度的更新。
Anim Cogn. 2023 Jan;26(1):199-228. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01733-2. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
5
Archaeological evidence for thinking about possibilities in hominin evolution.考古证据对人属进化中可能性的思考。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Dec 19;377(1866):20210350. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0350. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
6
On the evolution of a functional approach to memory.论记忆的功能方法的演变。
Learn Behav. 2022 Mar;50(1):11-19. doi: 10.3758/s13420-021-00472-7. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
7
Of Great Apes and Magpies: Initiations into Animal Behaviour.《大猩猩与喜鹊：动物行为入门》
Animals (Basel). 2020 Dec 10;10(12):2369. doi: 10.3390/ani10122369.
8
New Caledonian crows plan for specific future tool use.新喀鸦会计划特定的未来工具使用。
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Nov 11;287(1938):20201490. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1490. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
9
Macphail's Null Hypothesis of Vertebrate Intelligence: Insights From Avian Cognition.麦克菲尔关于脊椎动物智力的零假设：来自鸟类认知的见解。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 8;11:1692. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01692. eCollection 2020.
本文引用的文献
1
Ravens parallel great apes in flexible planning for tool-use and bartering.渡鸦在灵活规划工具使用和物物交换方面与类人猿相似。
Science. 2017 Jul 14;357(6347):202-204. doi: 10.1126/science.aam8138. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
2
Bonobos and orangutans, but not chimpanzees, flexibly plan for the future in a token-exchange task.倭黑猩猩和猩猩（而非黑猩猩）能在代币交换任务中灵活地为未来做计划。
Anim Cogn. 2014 Nov;17(6):1329-40. doi: 10.1007/s10071-014-0768-6. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
3
Great apes can defer exchange: a replication with different results suggesting future oriented behavior.大型猿类可以推迟交换：一项具有不同结果的复制实验，表明其具有面向未来的行为。
Front Psychol. 2013 Oct 2;4:698. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00698. eCollection 2013.
Zotero 插件